when are christians gonna wake up and realize that real christianity is part of Sanatana Dharma, and that jesus was one of the avataras (alongside krishna) that preached moksha, and not the ridiculous theology christians church teach?
In order to understand Jesus you have to understand the wisdom of the ancient rishis of india, because jesus studied the vedas during the time he spent in india.
 CRIME Shirt $21.68 |
 Nothing Ever Happens Shirt $21.68 |
CRIME Shirt $21.68 |
its all different versions of the same story
Yeah, look into Kalki. It's the Second Coming of Jesus Vishnu Edition.
does it make any diference?
i also thought of this decades ago
Sanatana meaning satan or satya?
Sanatana means eternal and Dharma means way. The Eternal Way.
No shit Sherlock
Yeah but someone said this.
>sanatana meaning satan or satya?
Thought I'd knock out the idea that it has anything to do with Satan. Satya is truth. It's not that either. Call that loser a moron, not me.
Rta
The way some (lots of?) Hindus say any given person is merely an avatar of one person is really not cash money. Just talked to someone today who implied that the Buddha was merely an avatar of Vishnu
Cash money is easy
It's uncanny how many avatars of Vishnu either look like Jesus or allude to him. Call it bias, but it really is strange. Especially the fish god. Fishoo.
Or manu and matsya. R u stupid?
No, are you? We finally got a thread about Hinduism and there's no hate about Indians. That's pretty good.
>t. Pajeet
Its probably cuz a lot of hindus use EerieWeb
Don't you know that elon musk is actually the 31st avatar of Lord Vishnu?
Of course i knew that
swami vivekanda comments on this and says:
"There is a great deal of similarity between the lives of Tesus and Krishna. A discussion is going on as to which borrowed of the other. ...
I will find you the answer in the words of Krishnna himself: "Whenever virtue subsides and irreligion prevails, I come down. Again and again I come. Therefore, whenever thou seest a great soul struggling to uplift mankind, know that I am come, and worship. ... "
A Hindu devotee would say: It is God himself who became Christ and Krishna and Buddha and all these [great teachers]."
Prophets are amongst you
>A Hindu devotee would say: It is God himself who became Christ and Krishna and Buddha and all these [great teachers]."
Based Perennialism
>Whenever virtue subsides and irreligion prevails, I come down. Again and again I come. Therefore, whenever thou seest a great soul struggling to uplift mankind, know that I am come, and worship
But why would an all powerful God need to come to uplift mankind repeatedly? Jesus took the penalty of all of humanity's sin upon Himself, He made a full and final way, nothing needs to be added to it, nothing beyond it can be done for humanity. The teachers sent then become mere humans sent to teach, not avatars/incarnations.
I am not stupid and i am not a monster but i kill monsters
So you are fully awake, that you see to ask us to awaken?
In order to understand Jesus, you need a basic level of reading comprehension. Unfortunately, the vast majority of people, including yourself, believe you know how to read when in fact you are an illiterate emulating, mimicking, and parroting language as a replacement for an honest day of work.
and krishna said thousands of years before jesus:
"Engage your mind always in thinking of Me, become My devotee, offer obeisances to Me and worship Me. Being completely absorbed in Me, surely you will come to Me."
B.G.Chapter 9, Verse 34
"Abandon all varieties of religion and just surrender unto Me. I shall deliver you from all sinful reactions. Do not fear."
B.G.Chapter 18, Verse 66
"Always think of Me, become My devotee, worship Me, and offer your homage unto Me. Thus you will come to Me without fail. I promise you this because you are My very dear friend."
B.G.Chapter 18, Verse 65
Wake the frick up stupid christian, take the veil from off your eyes and realize that what you worship as christ and what hindus worship as krishna are THE SAME. stop blindly listening to priests and preachers that will only detour you from your spiritual progression.
And God said, in the beginning, "Let there be light".
All the Vedantin traditions only developed in the early to late Medieval ages. Christianity was already around in India but had little penetration.
To be fair it is usually only westerners associated with these traditions who hold that stuff outside a few groups aimed at the west.
>Wake the frick up stupid christian,
Is this how Krishna orders you to speak in the Bhagavad Gita
BG 17.15: Words that do not cause distress, are truthful, inoffensive, and beneficial, as well as regular recitation of the Vedic scriptures—these are declared as austerity of speech.
If you were more advanced then Christians, you would not speak this way. This is fundamentalist fanatical nonsense.
Even ISKCON does not teach people to speak this way, which makes me suspect you are some uneducated new bhakta from a village in India.
>thousand of years before
proofs? Mahabharata is fairly modern text
Have you noticed that every single religion and political movement that's implicitly hostile to Christendom constantly insist
>akshually, REAL CHRISTIANITY is what I PERSONALLY ALREADY BELIEVE???
But Christians feel absolutely no need to pretend Buddhism or Hinduism or socialism or any other -ism is secretly Christianity? And also, despite insisting how much Christianity is already basically what you believe, you never go to Church and keep trying to change it? Hmmm could you perhaps be a completely cynical subversive who just doesn't like Christianity at all and is misrepresenting what he believes in order to trick people into aligning with your personal philosophy hmmm I wonder hmmm
>But Christians feel absolutely no need to pretend [...] socialism or any other -ism is secretly Christianity?
Except that is so common, it's laughable, from conservatives claiming socialism is just secular Christianity, to the enormous Christian socialist movement.
>conservatives claiming socialism is just secular Christianity
that's libertarians and nazi LARPagans
>Christian socialist movement
fringe movement cause it makes zero sense
A difference between socialism and subsidizing voracious consumers
Christians claim Alchemy is a Christian concept a lot so your claim isn't as valid as you think.
Also, this exact thing happened in the past with pagan holidays in order to convert people to Christianity.
That is because there was a model of alchemy that was based upon Christian views the virtues. They did not have any issue saying that the previous pagan versions were false. People misinterept the Christian holidays because historically Christians had huge seasons of holidays, not single days to begin with. Think Lenten season.
There is no evidence Jesus went to India and the story of His resurrection is complete on its own. It doesn't need to be explained through Indian mysticism.
and israelites were already in india before that
vedanta has no influence from christianity whatsoever lol, this is a lion king copied kimba the white lion situation
is meant to answer
but to answer
>It doesn't need to be explained through Indian mysticism.
indeed because the ressurection myth is explained through israeli mysticism, and anything that's israeli ain't worth a lick, including a messiah
99% of "Christians" can't even follow the basics of Christ's moral teachings especially in the US. A ton of them are on /x/ taking a break from /misc/. Literally hateful people that act and think the exact opposite of what Jesus taught.
What do you think Jesus taught and why?
Yes a lot of these mental baboons are on twitter, if you cant even understand basic exoteric principles( which are for everyone even the moronic) you are emotionally immature and not capable of material detachement
I'll be honest with you man, a few of Christ's parables were pretty spiteful. Maybe not in the same vein or context as those you reference, but nonetheless it remains, one that comes to mind is Matthew 25:14-30's Parable of the Talents which effectively amounts to the punishment of idiots for not knowing better unless I'm missing something.
If Jesus went to India, he went to visit the arya, not the dasas
Two things unique to Jesus:
1 - He was fully incarnated, while previous avatars aways kept part of their conscience in the Astral Plane. Therefore, Jesus is the only god who experienced death in the same way as a humans do.
2 - Jesus brought karmic wisdom down to Earth. Humans can now understand and have an active role in their development while alive. Before, our purpose was to simply passivelly live out the karma that was planned for us between incarnations.
Real one here
Please keep this ISKCON stuff away from /X/. ISKCON is an abusive organization.
Also stop trying to gaslight people with devotion to Christ into another religion.
Christ never went to India, no matter what the Aquarian Gospel, the book Prabhupada got that idea from, says. He didn't go to Jaganatha Puri. He isn't buried in Pakistan as the Prophet Isa.
He spent is childhood in Egypt and lived in Galilee. He studied with Rabbis and was extremely well versed in the israeli scriptures. But he went even higher, to embrace principles of universalism, compassion and forgiveness.
You want to steal all of this and attribute it to your religion. "He must have learned it from us".
Even worse, many Hindu's especially the nationalist types who use the term "Sanatani" and "Sanatan Dharma" actually hate Christianity.
Christ was something entirely different, and something greater. He wasn't just a Hindu Rishi. He was the fulfillment of the Israelite covenant as the Messiah. He is the divine Son of God. He embodies the Holy Spirit and God's love and mercy for humanity.
He is not an avatara of Vishnu, or even a shaktyavesha partial avatara. You are free to believe that if you like, but don't mix religious traditions. Don't subvert Christianity. Christianity is not the "ABC's of religion" it is far beyond your understanding.
He was far closer to a Zoroastrian Sayoshant, as Second Temple Judaism was influenced by Zoroastrianism. But he was really his own thing, a powerful force that elevated human consciousness.
Stop trying to claim Jesus and trick Christians into joining the cult of ISKCON.
Srila Prabhupada even said Haridasa Thakur, someone no one has even heard of, is greater than Jesus Christ.
I'm not a ISKCON member lol, not even close to it, Gaudiya Vaishnavism is my least favorite type of indian philosophy. I am way more of a Advaita guy.
Alright then, if you are an Advaita Vedantist then you should follow in the line of Ramakrishna Paramahamsa. He immersed himself in different traditions to understand them on his own terms. He didn't just say "all religions are branches of Hinduism. I am knowing".
To use a common Indian analogy, you are like someone licking the outside of the honey bottle of Christianity. You have to immerse yourself in Christianity and devotion to Christ to understand it.
There are great mysteries that can only be understood by grace and not all paths are the same. Yes they may lead to the same source, but one is not the other.
This one knows
Ramakrishna still kept his connection to Mother Kali, by whose grace he came to understanding of spiritual truth, even though he took the journeys of these different religions
>and not the ridiculous theology christians church teach?
Jesus as a historical figure is mixed. Likely an apocalpytic prophet (as was common during the period) who won't return. His, from what we can gather of the parts of the gospels, teachings are in the Judeo-Christian context rather than being anything Hindu related. Much of the talk about logos comes from John which, as a text, is likely the most inacurrate and distant from what a historical Jesus actually taught.
>and not the ridiculous theology christians church teach?
no he didn't. As a position it's pretty much considered nonsense (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unknown_years_of_Jesus#Rejection_by_modern_mainstream_New_Testament_scholarship).
Honestly, I would look into Hinduism if it wasn't for the fact that most white people deep into hinduism are usually larping as fascists who just want a religious reason for forced societal segregation.
dont go for regular hindusim its nothign special. you need to go for tantric forms if you want to learn anything. these are much much less common in india
So mysticism. Which we also have in the Occident.
Look, I'm happy you're happy with what you've found, but we have our mysteries too. Some of them are quite similar to yours. Not because they come from yours, but because the mysteries are the same everywhere you go. But the mysteries can only be understood within the religious culture someone grew up in for them to truly comprehend the mysteries.
sorry, it's late and I'm going out for a drink soon. What I meant to say with the last sentence was:
The mysteries have to be understood within the religious cultural context someone grew up in. Only then can they truly comprehend them.
“I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me.
Means logos, means logic. So what they are saying is basically use your logos/logic to understand the world morons. I am the way
Interesting way to bring these religions together. Any logical christian should be troubled by the presence of so many other religions.
Yeah. I am not christian, when someone exposes the esoteric meanings of the bible or what meant before the bible took it from other religions. They get dissonant, everyone would when trying to conceive the stories as literal. It's designed this way.
This is from a largely Eastern Orthodox perspective but it captures what the term Logos means.
Its just order, logic. And everyone with some brain can use it. So that you can see crystal clear or christlike clear or krishnaish clear. No need to overcomplicate and use our intelligence against us. We are doing theology right now, we are using logic to understand theos/god. Doing what Jesus said, getting to know god throught him. Jesus is the logos, sometimes the sun or else. Not a person
Logos here is a really loaded term in Greek. It means the ground of being. Think like Heraclitus.
>not the ridiculous theology christians church teach?
But they teach a remedial form of bhakti, which is a perfectly valid and powerful part of santana dharma.
I hate krishnas, some of the most annoying homosexuals ever, why are his followers so shitty?
Because people that only follow the bhakti path are shitty. Like
Said. Most christians follow a similar bhakti path, its a feel good for simple minded people. See video for a kindergarden explanation: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mYqKjsrFmJA
>its a feel good for simple minded people
And yet the impersonalists can never manage it.
If it such an easy thing, and as you agreed it is valid - why not do it?
What's important - that you achieve the ultimate goal or that you did it "the hard way"?
Im not getting you. Im not that emotional of a person and most people here on a text board are probably also not. I prefer to use real science and logic, which a lot of christians despise. So a path may be incompatible with others but a sane person probably respects others and learns from other ways
cont. The Bhaktis people can go stray and toxic when they ignore everything else and go the route of I can just feel good all the time, don't need anything else. A toxic positivity that can go wrong. Not all 'bhakti' people are bad but some are annoying and they can be very
>I prefer to use real science and logic, which a lot of christians despise.
Yes, they are fools, but they are devoted. The Gita quite clearly explains that the analytical and the devotional have the same ultimate goal, and that both are valid paths to that goal, though they view the goal in different ways.
>The Bhaktis people can go stray and toxic when they ignore everything else and go the route of I can just feel good all the time, don't need anything else.
This doesn't make any sense at all. Bhakti paths are full of injunctions on proper and improper behavior. It's a false claim.
>Not all people are bad but some are annoying and they can be very
Correct.
Technically the different traditions have different goals. Some want to go to various lokas, others want to realize the atman is the Brahman, others realize the atman is reliant upon the Brahman etc.
It is pretty clear what Logos means alongside all the other titles of Jesus as Christ in traditional Christian theology.
https://www.learnreligions.com/names-of-jesus-christ-2159232
Same goal in that they all declare an ultimate state to attain, and all acknowledge the other paths can attain at least some form of that ultimate state.
>I'm referring to emotional people broadly
Correct, people can get emotional. It's why the bhakti paths strongly recommends one control their mind.
>they annoy me.
Quite emotional of you.
You are quoting multiple people. I have not quoted the Gita in this thread.
Do you prefer I use other translations, or do you think only your translation is proper?
Here is another translation of the Gita not from Iskcon, along with the bhasyas from the four Vaishnava paramparas.
None of it ISKCON, all of in alignment with what I have said.
https://bhagavad-gita.org/
I'm referring to emotional people broadly. They can exist everywhere, ignorant of the improper behavior established by a school. Or they know something similar by other school. Whatever the case, my experience with the hare krishnas in my city is that they annoy me.
Also the reason I accused you of being a member of ISKCON is you are using their Bhagavad Gita translations when you quote the Gita.
Christianity is not "Bhakti Yoga". Nor are Bhakti Yoga practitioners "stupid and shitty".
There are principles of karma, yoga, jnana, bhakti all within Christianity, just as in Hinduism.
Christianity is varied with many branches. Yes there are some dogmatic branches which are shallow in their understanding, just as in Hinduism.
But there is a form of Christianity that is highly mystical. Christianity is the child of Mediterranean and Near East. It contains within it many strands of ancient knowledge.
Platonism and Neoplatonism are important to the Catholic and Orthodox traditions. Read the teachings of Proclus, they are even more sophisticated than Advaita Vedanta.
Read the teachings of Dionysius the Aeropagite.
Uneducated inexperienced Hindus have such a childish understanding of the Western Esoteric traditions which are incredibly rich and powerful.
What to speak of how the human soul shines through and expresses love for God and knowledge of God through all traditions.
You quote the Bhagavad Gita, what about BG 2.46:
Whatever purpose is served by a small well of water is naturally served in all respects by a large lake. Similarly, one who realizes the Absolute Truth also fulfills the purpose of all the Vedas.
If you understand Brahman, you can see it everywhere and in all traditions, what to speak of it being the very nature of all living beings, and inert matter.
?si=d7PbXk34uSCqh6A5
If Platonism and Neoplatonism are so important for them then why did the christians destroy much of the greek and roman teachings? What you are saying wont matter. What matters is what the religion as a general preaches and what the general populance learns from it. What do catholics say in my country?: Do devotion and do not ask questions. Same as the ISKCON you are referring to. Do devotion and do not ask questions.
Free and exploratory thought is forbidden, so just feel and preach. That is a toxic bhakti, so yes christians are mostly 'bhakti yoga'. The way of the sheep, a pastor's specialty. You would be banned from any church, because you refer apocryphal texts, heretic lmao
Yes there is toxic bhakti. There is also toxic jnana. I can't tell you how many people I have seen perverting Advaita Vedanta and walking around thinking "I am God!". Or they justify perversion and abuse because "it's all Brahman".
I wouldn't describe low level dogmatic fundamentalist Christianity as "Bhakti Yoga". It is sectarian dharma. There are traditions which are closer to Bhakti Yoga, generally practiced by monastics and nuns. Some of whom are highly advanced spiritualists.
>Do devotion and don't ask questions.
Yes you are right about this. It is there in Hinduism as well, and in Advaita based cults. Hinduism is often very cultish and authoritarian.
Yes I am a heretic, from a narrow uneducated perspective. But for most of history, Christians monks were well versed in esoteric subject matters.
And the writings of Greek philosophy are very well known and influential in Christian circles. Go and read how Platonism influenced St Augustine, what to speak of the Orthodox Church.
It irks me that Hindus think their tradition is SOOOO superior when they know nothing about Christianity.
It is the same way that ISKCON looks at Advaita Vedanta. They have this very simplistic ignorant biased view of the writings of Shankara and yet they think they are superior.
It's literally all connected, not just to Hinduism. Perhaps it's because modern religions derived from ancient ones, perhaps because of something greater. I have found myself drifting from the church and it's teachings, to a much more board spiritual sense. I've stopped eating beef and pork, and am trying to become a better person. This world is so horrible because it is a trail, God or Gods, whatever form or names they make take, is waiting. The virtuous will meet our divine creator(s), the sinful will return to this world, or perhaps one that is worse. Samsara is very real, and I hope that one day we can all find freedom.
The one thing I don't agree with Christian people on is that they worship an idol rather than praying directly to G-d
In Christianity, they would claim they are 't worshipping idols. Jesus is literally one of the persons of the Trinity or God. The Holy Spirit, Jesus, and the Father are persons or prosopon, that answers who God is. What God is is all knowing , all good, all powerful and all knowing essence. The three persons share that same essence. Basically, only one God, one indivisible divine essence, in traditional types of Christianity . Below is a video with a lecture about it.
israeli mindvirus
>When are Christians gonna wake up and follow my made up headcanon where Jesus is actually some Indian god and visited India even though this is not part of the Gospels whatsoever
>jesus was one of the avataras (
He was not. Jesus was maybe influenced by some Indian monk but avatar? No
The miracles he showed were commonly shown by Indian monks back in those days.
incorrect
average ppl aren't religious anymore.
They just play along with whatever is expected of them and then return to atheism.
It is the aliens that is real.
It's bullshit. The idea that Jesus came to India and learnt Sanatan Dharma was actually formulated by a israeli Russian adventurer Nicolas Notovitch.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nicolas_Notovitch
>Notovitch's 1894 book La vie inconnue de Jesus Christ (Life of Saint Issa) claims that during his unknown years, Jesus left Galilee for India and studied with Buddhists and Hindus there before returning to Judea
>After breaking his leg in India and while recovering from it at the Hemis monastery in Ladakh, Notovitch learned of the Tibetan manuscript Life of Saint Issa, Best of the Sons of Men—Isa being the Arabic name of Jesus in Islam. Notovitch's account, with the text of the Life, was published in French in 1894 as La vie inconnue de Jésus-Christ
>The philologist Max Müller expressed incredulity at the account presented and suggested that either Notovitch was the victim of a practical joke or he had fabricated the evidence.
>Swami Abhedananda, who was a colleague of Max Mueller and initially sceptical of Notovitch's claims, claimed to have visited the Hemis monastery in 1922 whilst travelling through Kashmir and Tibet to verify the reports of Notovich that he had heard the previous year in the U.S. He claimed that lamas at the monastery confirmed to him that Notovich was brought to the monastery with a broken leg and he was nursed there for a month and a half. They also told him that the Tibetan manuscript on Issa was shown to Notovich and its contents interpreted so that he could translate them into Russian.This manuscript was shown to Abhedananda, which had 14 chapters, containing 223 couplets (slokas). The Swami had some portions of the manuscript translated with the help of a lama, about 40 verses of which appeared in the Swami's travelogue.The original Pali manuscript—allegedly composed after Christ's resurrection[a]—was said to be in the monastery of Marbour near Lhasa.
This sounds like yet another confusion involving Apollonius of Tyana
I am one with the Earth Mother. I am awake, I am awake.
Only say it once
why are pajeets so obsessed with demons and shitting on the name of Christ instead of fixing their cesspool of a country?
Actually they are fairly quiet taking your insults
Shit spreaders
They have an extreme inferiority complex. You have to put yourself in their position to understand. Whites are basically like living Gods (or upadevas) compared to them.
The only claim of superiority they have is a deep and long spiritual tradition. This peaked in the era of the Upanishads and Vedanta, 500 BC to 500 AD. It is highly impressive. Probably some of the most clearly expressed mystical philosophy in human history.
But the modern pajeet has little or nothing to do with it. One of the characteristics of being free of ahankara or egotism is the freedom from upadi's or bodily categories. A self realized soul does not identify as Indian, does not feel envy towards Whites, does not identify with "Bharata Varsha", does not call himself a "Sanatani", and is not desperate to insult others and raise himself above them.
All of these are features of ignorance. They are symptomatic of a soul lost in Maya. So the philosophical tradition of India becomes nothing but a weapon of the ego.
They believe they are "Hindus" and therefore superior to "Christians". Not recognizing this contradicts the most essential teachings of actual Hindu doctrine.
Nor do they understand Christianity. Christianity is just as deep as Hinduism, if you enter into it. Especially when you understand it in the light of the Western Esoteric traditions.
Christianity is older than modern Hinduism, which really began in the Middle Ages. Christianity has been in India longer than the modern Hindu traditions.
What they typically call the "ABC's" of religion, considering Christianity to be some foolish mleccha religion, is actually an extremely deep and powerful tradition, far more focused and even powerful than Hinduism.
Some Tantriks who engage in intense ritual puja reach intimate levels of contact with deities that Christians experience through Christ and Mary without such rituals.
I believe another reason they denigrate Christianity is the reason Whites attained to sch a high degree of success, wealth, intelligence, inventiveness, courage, technology, and unrivaled personal beauty, is because they worshiped Christ with intense devotion for almost 2000 years.
All of that is failing now because Whites have disconnected themselves from Christ. It is happening dramatically and withing our lifetime. The reason pajeets are able to invade white countries by the millions is because Whites disconnected from Christ.
Pajeets know this. At least subconsciously. Therefore it makes them feel inferior about their religion too.
That is my theory at least.
What about pre christian europe? rome? greece?
the reason why aryans were so succesfull was because of their blood and they were so despite christianity not because of it, or any other religion
>when are christians gonna wake up and realize that real christianity is part of Sanatana Dharma
Never because you have no historical evidence proving this.
This is a belief that came about as a cope during the Anglo colonial period when all the missionaries were running about.
This is a belief that was created as a cope during the Anglo colonial period when all the missionaries were running about trying to "save the hindoos".
Where do I find all of the Vedas? I heard the originals were lost or some shit. Where do I get them from?
Bruh what are you smoking? Most of it is intact and easily found in their originals and all sorts of translations. For the Rig Veda, I recommend R. L. Kashyap's or Stephanie W. Jamison and Joel P. Brereton's 2014 translation.
The Bhagavad Gita had over 900 English translations available by the 1990s - I recommend Prabhupada's original 1972 version, but there are a few other really good ones.
The Yajur, Atharva, and Sama Vedas are very interesting as well - though I recommend reading a few of the Puranas and Upanishads before digging into them. Read some secondary sources too before digging into the Vedas themselves.
It's just that I've read somewhere that the Vedas were all divided into shakhas and that most of them got lost overtime due to poor preservation. I was thinking if those shakhas actually contained very important information or if they were more or less the same thing said over and over again.
Thanks for the recommendations though, I'll look into these when I have the time.
There was never a single compilation of the Vedas but multiple texts and books of them. There is evidence some Vedic texts for example being denied as authoritative and with debates about things like Yajur Veda for example being accepted or not. When you don't work from the later Post-Vedic religious assumptions, it is much much less organized, even if modern Hinduism is more a cluster of religions anyway.
The early Pre-Vedanta traditions are considered the most philosophical. They had to be because Jains and Buddhists used arguments and logic. Once they left the subcontinent for the most part, you got all the Vedantin traditions. Part of is because they interacted more with Islam and that created a need for more religious and devotional forms.
Vedantin traditions actually derive their arguments from the language of the Vedas. Basically, the language of the Vedas reflect reality itself. They don't really have arguments apart from the Vedas. Basically, they start from the view that Vedas and the Upanishads are true and then argue about the nature of the Brahman based on the grammar.
I just had second coming
Woke up and hit again in the morny
She thanked me with eggs and bacon
Thanks for being another sign that Christ's return is soon. Repent or burn. Just a reminder.
Burn, that's funny. There is no Hell. There is only the evil of men. So, be the best evil you can, and I am
What do we do about the pajeet problem on /x/?
Buddha was a trust fund baby who left his wife and kids.
in the Bhagavatam Lord Krishna spoke to Partha as follows:
He(God) created four varnas out of himself.
Brahmin - One who is a scholar
Kshatriya - One who is a leader and warrior
Vyshya - One who is good at trading.
Shudra - Other working class people.
-------
before Christian morality took hold of the current world order, Hindus believed a Brahmin was better than an untouchable even if that Brahmin is a crook and the untouchable innocent as a dove.
-
Jesus never divided people into classes. and Krishna is the best Hinduism has got
Jesus got 12 people to leave their families and instructed many people to do it. They're all servants of the demiurge anyway
God Im pissed im not alive during the incarnation of Meitreya. You Dharma gays are so annoying. Gotta cleanse your karma dawg so you can be an eternal slave to perpetuate karma cycles.
It's just funny that these homosexual hindus are going crazy.
Like someone even gives a shit.
This world is run by satan, only the real God would be mocked, scorned and made to seem less than what the world will believe. All secular intellects love all other religions except Christianity. Hmmm, wonder why?
how many of you are pajeets? be honest
Hindu Gods = Demons. I get physically sick every time i see them.
you are a homosexual learn somethign about anythign else other than your stupid religion. how can you talk bad about people who worship the one highest god same as you dummy
If they worshipped the same God, they would be Christians. Be gone, foul demon. In the name of Jesus, I banish thee.
Abracadabra
Amen, so it be in Jesus Name
When are you poojet cow dung connoisseurs going to acknowledge that your paganism is a corruption of the worship of the one true God? It is also convenient how Indra was removed from the religion because he hated shitskins.