Trust the Science. Worship the Science. Submit to the Science.
All dissenting ideas not following the settled doctrines of Science are problematic.
Evolution is a Scientific fact. Round Earth is a Scientific fact. Climate change is a Scientific fact. Your will do what you are told. Lack of faith in Science will result in punishment.
Accept the Science
Accept the Science
Accept the Science
 Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14 |
 Shopping Cart Returner Shirt $21.68 |
Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14 |
A bubble only has so much surface tension
A chicken finger only has so much breading
yeah well this one just keeps going and going
This is a mistake since modern physicists already lie to each other and themselves and the masses, and are easily controlled by peer pressure.
>The big bang never happened
You can't say that!
>Evolution didn't happen
"You can't say that!"
>White people are smarter than black people
"You can't say that!"
>Sex and race aren't social constructs
"You can't say that!"
Two of the above are wrong. Two of the above are incorrect. You still can't speak either.
Scientific racism is demonstrably proven to be correct, evolution is the best explanation but if you believe their claim for the creation of the universe is real you're moronic.
Shill
>A broken clock is right twice a day
>>A broken clock is right twice a day
Shills
bot
They're bots bro see how they instantly called you a bot? It's all programmed. Soldiers of the new religion.
>when you want to have a bot on the chanz but all you can afford in computing power is GPT-0.1
This is why i deeply hate normalgays and religious fanatics.
Except black people are more tribal and natural since they spent the last thousands of yesrs before the 1600s in pure nature, making them closer to God and happiness. Some are just held down by white people and their own tribal war like nature (which also proves they are stronger than civilian whites as well as closer to God) in civilized countries.
Which flavor of paste is your favorite?
yep it's also why black musicians have vastly more groove and feel than any other race
based knower
/misc/ was right again.
A broken clock is right twice a day
>A broken clock is right twice a day
/misc/ does come up with some interesting things every now and then
Try almost all them time, homosexual.
/misc/ is always right, you will learn that someday
Allegedly this is the infographic
>t. Incapable of thinking for himself
I always think about the Japanese internment camps in the US and how it's rather glossed over. It's mentioned they exist, it's mentioned Japanese people were put there, but no one goes into detail on how they were treated or what the conditions were like. We just accept that it was a silly mistake and move on.
But what if the Allies lost WW2? What if Japan and Germany successfully invaded the US and dragged on a two-front campaign for months that stretched national supplies super thin? Would the Japanese happen upon Japanese internment camps full of malnourished inmates who couldn't be kept clothed and fed due to supply shortages? Would there be dirt poor conditions and mass deaths?
I suspect if the Allies lost WW2 the world would be concerned with America's "Japanese extermination camps" while the camps in Germany would be brushed aside. There would be school lessons about the atrocities of America's holocaust of Japanese people and so on. "Remember the 6 million brave Japanese souls genocided by the evil Americans."
Really puts things in perspective in terms of how the victor truly does write history.
>Welcome to /misc/ you're here for life
That is the gayest thing I've ever read
>bro these infographics with zero citations changed my life
morons like you are gonna end up in re-education camps
So-called "race realism" is settled science in genetics. Just because nobody makes a big deal out of human biodiversity doesn't mean it's fake.
>So-called "race realism" is settled science in genetics.
No, it isn't, and nothing about genetic sciences justifies the dehumanizing racism that /misc/tards push with their day of the rope fantasies.
Whether you choose to dehumanize other human subspecies is a personal or political choice with no real bearing on the genetic differences between them. You can make fun of people for that without denying fundamental facts.
nah everything is the same, as it should be. everything should be the same! we should atom bomb all the mountains and fill in all the trenches and valleys in the world so it's all flat and there's no topography - that way it'll all be equal! and then let's genetically splice every plant and animal together so they're all the same! let's invent teleporters and warp all the planets into the sun so they're all together - and equal!!!! why, let's just destroy the whole universe so there's nothing at all. existence is for chuds!
>California wanting to be paranormal discussion illegal isn't paranormal
Okay shill
This is what science is: made up lies to control
>wanting to be paranormal discussion illegal
we get it, you're functionally illiterate
para meaning against as a latin prefix, so paranormal is just anything out of the normal, occult meaning hidden.
yeah well blame moot for being a stupid c**t, this is an occult board.
Praise be to our Scientists, hallowed be thy name.
Thy technocracy come, Thy will be done in reality as is in ye’ holy Models.
Give us our daily Newsfeeds and forgive us our trespasses
As we forgive those who doubt thee.
Lead us not into independent thought but deliver us from our physical bodies into thy virtual busso
Q.E.D.
-The Technocrat’s Prayer (The Litany of Scientism)
Science doesn't use faith, kek
>Trust in God
>Trust the experts
Literally what is the difference?
Because the only people telling you to "trust the experts" are the same people that don't understand the importance of the phrase "scientists agree". No scientist runs their study on faith, doing so is inherently unscientific. That said, it's their job to disagree, to find new understanding. Once they agree on something, it's nigh impossible to be contrary without being subjective.
>priest tells you to baptize your kids to save them from hell because God said so
>expert tells you to inject your kids to save them from covid because the science says so
You still haven't explained the difference. YOU are not conducting experiments yourself to find the truth. YOU are just putting faith in whatever you're told the science says. The scientific METHOD is a fact-based way of experimenting with reality in a reliable way, but that's not what "Science" is when people say "trust the experts," or even "scientists agree." You have to trust that the studies are sound, that the evidence supports the conclusion, that there's no foul play or manipulation, that no findings are being hidden or covered up... The scientific method doesn't use faith, but your and my understanding of most scientific findings at large certainly does.
That's just it. You don't need to "trust" science for it to work. I can easily disbelieve gravity, jump, and be immediately confused. This doesn't mean gravity is fake, it means I'm an idiot that doesn't understand how matter displaces space, and that space attempting to return to its original point is what creates gravity. Notice how "not believing in gravity" didn't stop a more advanced form of understanding from existing? That's why science doesn't use faith, it doesn't have to.
>when people say...
Literally don't care. Science doesn't use faith. If you need faith to understand things, you're not a scientist. You not being a scientist doesn't make science fake, it simply means you haven't studied the most advanced forms of reasoning in a given field. You don't have to, not doing so doesn't mean those fields of study suddenly stop existing. Do you not know what object permanence is?
You're clearly too moronic to actually understand my point.
>2022
>still conflating science with Science
ngmi
most of it does require faith. what you should've said is, science is based on evidence. the conclusions you draw from that evidence often require a degree of faith. the big bang theory is mostly based on faith, our understanding of electromagnetism is based on faith, our models of black holes are based on faith, what we think the composition of different planets in our solar system is is based on faith. if you come to a conclusion based on a method with some margin of error, that conclusion is partially faith based. your unwavering confidence that the conclusion is 100% correct and that anyone who questions it is an insane wacko makes your confidence in that conclusion MOSTLY faith based. people like you need religion, you need to be controlled. you are stupid, stupid people need to be protected. you need help. maybe neil tyson and pfizer can help you, i don't know
>Science is Truth
>Evolution is a Scientific fact.
>Round Earth is a Scientific fact.
>Climate change is a Scientific fact.
>Your will do what you are told. Lack of faith in Science will result in punishment.
>Accept the Science
>Accept the Science
>Accept the Science
I accept
I'll pass, for how much some of you claim to have revolutionary ideas you sure do seem miserable
You vill troost ze scieyonce
>"If you deny this set of conclusions reached with the scientific method, you deny science."
What was once the pursuit of knowledge is now just another religion. Welcome to Hell, ladies and gentlemen.
I wish to kill every human on the planet
>MFW science has reached its limits and reverts to Brahman
>MFW this has yet to happen
https://www.youtube.com/watch?app=desktop&v=E0Ja86JIhts
>he believes spacetime is fundamental
>he thinks everything is quarks and gluons
>he thinks the infinite complexity of Platonic/Mathematic reality can be contained in 2lb of meat and some neurons firing
>he doesn't know what a calculator is
>he thinks a calculator explains consciousness
>thinks data literally represents reality
>apparently hasn't calculated before
>thinks a calculation isn't data
>muh calculator
>brain like an abacus made of corn on a string
>Lou has two apples.
>David gives Lou two.
>You think Lou now has the number four thanks to your trusty calculator
Good thing data literally represents reality, righ?
Do Americans really not know how to use a calculator properly? fricking kek
>Good thing data literally represents reality, righ?
I never even made that claim, brainlet. Learn to read. Or better yet watch that video and actually learn something, or crawl back to your outdated science that ultimately doesn't explain the fundamentals of anything
>>he thinks a calculator explains consciousness
It doesn't "explain" it, it describes it. Data is not literally reality. It's a representation of it. Take your own advice
Kek show me how a calculator describes consciousness in any capacity. Consciousness is irreducable you absolute brainlet.
>Data is not literally reality
Yeah no shit and I never made that claim. Not only is the map not the territory, spacetime itself is not fundamental reality yet science right now cannot explain anything beyond space time because it sorely needs a new model.
Are you for real right now
Do you actually understand English? I will repeat one more time, show me how a calculator describes consciousness, you diluted cumshot.
>you diluted cumshot
did you mean deluded there, chief?
how autistic can you get
did you mean artistic there, chief?
I did. Math describes our perception of consciousness; I never claimed calculation explains the supernatural, that was your presumption likely because you're functionally illiterate. Just because I'm not answering how you want doesn't mean I haven't answered your question. You're literally the guy in
>Math describes our perception of consciousness
Care to actually go into the detail, in minute, on this statement? I went up to calc 2, as well as taking a numbers theory class while majoring in Bio with a minor in Chem, and this is literally just word salad.
In minutae* that is.
Like, actually go into mathematical detail and prove this claim, because it sounds like pure bullshit. I have a friend that went the Neuroscience route, and even he wouldn't make such a stupid claim.
42.
In all seriousness though, I'm not saying it describes conciousness itself, it describes what our conciousness perceives.
>You see Lou has two apples
>You see David gives Lou two
>You look down into the calculator in your hands, unable to do this calculation in your head, carefully inputting the relevant information
>2
>+
>2
=
>4
>You think this number four means Lou now has the number four, literally
>Because you don't understand how math describes conciousness and doesn't explain it
Is that clear enough for you?
lurker here... none of what you wrote explains anything.
That's because math isn't used to explain consiousness, it can only describe what happens around it. Thus the joke
>42
since that's "the ultimate answer to life, the universe, and everything". The issue is knowing what the question is.
That sounds like projection. Until you can understand how numbers don't explain how conciousness functions while they can be used to describe what happens around our conciousness, I can't help you. You can lead a horse to water...
>That sounds like projection.
I used to be bright eyed and idealistic like you. I didn't understand why people said, "Science is the new religion," because science was so clearly just this rational, evidence-based system of self-correcting beliefs. Eventually I learned to tell the difference between the science that shows us gravity exists, predicts the existence of black holes, and provides the framework for understanding the world around us, and the science that tells us the covid shots are safe and effective, redefines "vaccine" to include mRNA shots that don't generate immunity, and insists that men can be women and women can be men.
>I liked science when it only said things I emotionally agree with
Heinrich Himmler is e-girlng at you rn
>covid shots are safe and effective
You think you'd be seeing mass deaths by now if they weren't
Oh wait right, they're definitely being covered up, which means we can place that understanding firmly in the "faith" section, which isn't science
>redefines "vaccine" to include mRNA shots that don't generate immunity
If it doesn't generate immunity that means it doesn't work. I have trouble understanding that, namely for the above reason. Shots went out, infection levels went down, virus mutates, levels go back up, more shots, levels go back down, etc ad nauseam. Works better than herd complacency, excuse me, immunity.
>men can be women and women can be men
With basic sexual examination, not technically. Yet, specific identifying characteristics in their brains defines them as belonging to the opposite sex. Because we don't have advanced brain surgery that can fix this, the next option is a sex modification.
The people that say
>men can be women and women can be men
are the same people that are saying
>trust the science
It's an incredibly basic take for those that will never understand the specific reason why these things are.
Trump 2020, kek
>>I liked science when it only said things I emotionally agree with
I liked science when it wasn't used as a blatant propaganda machine to control the masses into doing what the government wants in the name of "the science says so!"
>You think you'd be seeing mass deaths by now if they weren't
No, unsafe doesn't equal mass deaths, this is just more disingenuous Science propaganda. Pfizer actively covered up the side effects they found in their trials and hid the true numbers of incidence. It wasn't until a FOIA request pushed the courts to force Pfizer to release the information that we got to see the literal multiple-page-long list of known side effects discovered in the clinical trials. The release of these documents was downplayed and ignored in the mainstream media, but they're out there.
>If it doesn't generate immunity that means it doesn't work.
If it did generate immunity, people who got the "vaccine" wouldn't be getting sick with covid, yet every single person I know with the "vaccine" keeps getting covid, and it seems the more boosters they have the more often they get it. Doesn't seem very effective to me. Meanwhile, myself and others I know who didn't get the vaccine have never gotten sick with covid.
>Yet, specific identifying characteristics in their brains defines them as belonging to the opposite sex.
More bullshit you take on faith.
>I liked science when it wasn't used as a blatant propaganda machine to control the masses into doing what the government wants in the name of "the science says so!"
So yes, you preferred when they said things you emotionally agreed with. Noted.
>Pfizer actively covered up the side effects they found in their trials and hid the true numbers of incidence.
Pfizer is a company, they are no figurehead. More to the point, I'd bet they'd be more forthcoming if antivax wasn't in vogue, fashionista
>If it did generate immunity, people who got the "vaccine" wouldn't be getting sick with covid
That is indeed how things have been working out over here.
>yet every single person I know with the "vaccine" keeps getting covid
Because it mutates.
>it seems the more boosters they have the more often they get it.
I'm sure it does seem that way to someone that hasn't gotten even one shot.
>Meanwhile, myself and others I know who didn't get the vaccine have never gotten sick with covid.
I'm sure you feel fine, which would tell me you're just used to feeling sick 24/7. Reminds me of my alcoholic friend that would drink vodka water as soon as he got up, because he was hungover all the time. But he always "felt fine".
He died from inhaling his vomit one night, but hey, we don't get to choose our time to go.
>More bullshit you take on faith.
It's called the hypothalamus, specifically the sexually dimorphic nucleus located in the medial preoptic area (POA) of the hypothalamus. That's right, your brain and your body are both sexually dimorphic. And you can get a mismatched pair, resulting in your brain sending out the wrong signals to your pituitary gland, causing the gland to excrete the wrong hormones for your organs.
But sure, I'm using faith because you don't understand it. That's cohesive.
Not the guy you responded to but, get the vax, which doesn't work because it mutated, and continue to get boosted with this thing that not only doesn't work but wrecks havoc on your immune system https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-01-11/repeat-booster-shots-risk-overloading-immune-system-ema-says, because your moronic friend died because he was an alcoholic?
Let me get right on it.
He died because he was ignoring his sickness of overindulgence.
>Article
>"Repeat booster doses every four months could eventually weaken the immune response and tire out people, according to the European Medicines Agency. Instead, countries should leave more time between booster programs and tie them to the onset of the cold season in each hemisphere, following the blueprint set out by influenza vaccination strategies, the agency said."
To think the vax itself is causing the virus to mutate is effectively insisting the vax doesn't work. Because cooperation wasn't achieved, we didn't achieve immunity. Now that antivax has made rona an endemic, we have to live with it like we do with the flu. This warning would apply to people that get vaxxed repeatedly within a season, like this guy
https://www.dw.com/en/german-man-got-covid-jab-87-times-report/a-61338245
I do indeed, kek
>believes
I *understand* it, as opposed to your miscomprehension of calling body dysphoria "autogynephilia". You're ignoring every physical process explained and saying "no it's just a fetish, the fact the body feels like shit is actually the brain being aroused"
Fricking kek
>trannies have male brains
FtM trannies have male brains, correct
>in the rare cases that someone has a severe glandular pathology, their bodies become deformed not their minds.
Okay so having a "severe glandular pathology" wouldn't qualify as having a "deformed mind"? Nice non sequitur. Furthermore, those deformities include intersex mutation. What sex is an intersex person?
typo
>body dysmorphia
>Because cooperation wasn't achieved, we didn't achieve immunity. Now that antivax has made rona an endemic, we have to live with it like we do with the flu.
Look up Marek's Disease.
>Marek's disease is a highly contagious viral neoplastic disease in chickens.
Neat. Care to substantiate your assertion beyond "diseases exist"?
>the whole point of this argument was about preaching
No it isn't, go back and read how I keep saying "proceletyzing" which you think is somehow interchangable with "preaching", it isn't. Teaching in a private venue open to all that wish to be there is Preaching, going into public spaces disconnected from the spiritual world is Proceletyzing. They're different. If you want to preach, go to Church. I don't take issue with the existence of churches, in fact I celebrate them. That's why I enthusiastically endorse their creation.
>choosing not to engage and not to listen
The only way to ignore a message is to hear it first, this is why it's a forced message. You are turning people away that otherwise would come to His Word on their own, and all for the sake of prideful arrogance.
If you wish to preach, go to where his word will be appreciated. If you're dead set on it, you're still allowed to proceletyze and you'll still be going to heaven, you'll just have nothing (and you'll be happy).
>I need faith to accept things, so you do too
Yeah, no
>the conclusions you draw from that evidence often require a degree of faith
Again, no. Your brain is sexually dimorphic, just like your gonads. This means mispairings will happen. If you need faith to accept this, it means you don't understand it.
>[Various established fields of scientific study] are based on faith
It's like you seem to think that reasserting your point makes it more true.
>your unwavering confidence that the conclusion is 100% correct and that anyone who questions it is an insane wacko makes your confidence in that conclusion MOSTLY faith based etc
This is projection on your part. The entire point of science is to question things, but you're kidding yourself if you think hitting reset is going to net new results.
i never said you needed faith to accept things, i said you needed comprehensive evidence - except that's not even true, because a model can produce its expected result every time and still be fundamentally wrong. i don't know what the rest of your post means and i genuinely think you need to take your meds
>the conclusions you draw from that evidence often require a degree of faith.
>i never said you needed faith to accept things, i said you needed comprehensive evidence - except that's not even true, because I'm an incohesive moron spewing malodorous bile disguised as reasoning
Duly noted
i think youre actually mentally ill. i can tell from the way your posts are worded, the punctuation, and sentence structure that there is something quite wrong with you. i said, and i will repeat myself, that there are gaps in established knowledge. much of what you call science, is theoretical, not proven. when we use theories to explain nature, we are employing a degree of faith. this is not necessarily a bad thing - it's actually part of the scientific process. if we only employed models based on what we could concretely prove, we would never make any progress. the difference between science and divine religion, is that science is (supposed to be) based on evidence, whereas religion is based on feelings. the fact remains that science is incomplete, that scientists make mistakes, that scientists can be bribed and lie to you. you will believe these lies because they are scientists, and science is science, and we must believe the heckin science.
so yes, science does require a degree.of faith. if youre a fricktard who doesn't know anything about science and you listen to neil tyson and think there are 20 genders because bill nye said so, then "science" requires a LOT OF FAITH - about as much as radical wahabbist islam or schofield bible thumping evangelical christianity. conversely, if you know what the frick you're talking about, and read scientific journals, and aren't a moron frickhead, and don't believe everything the government and pharamceutical companies tell you, and you maintain a healthy air of skepticism, then science requires just a LITTLE WEENY bit of faith - far less than any religion.
>Neat. Care to substantiate your assertion beyond "diseases exist"?
Keep reading, moron.
>Vaccination is the only known method to prevent the development of tumors when chickens are infected with the virus. However, administration of the vaccine does not prevent an infected bird from shedding the virus,[3] though it does reduce the amount of virus shed in the dander, hence reducing horizontal spread of the disease. Marek's disease does not spread vertically.
>Because vaccination does not prevent infection with the virus, Marek's is still transmissible from vaccinated flocks to other birds, including the wild bird population.
The mRNA vaccines are leaky just like the Marek's disease vaccines. They prevent illness symptoms, but do not prevent the spread of it. Even if 100% of the population is vaccinated, the virus still continues to live and spread in the population, necessitating vaccination forever with no chance of actually eradicating the virus. The idea that fully vaccinating the whole population would kill off COVID forever has always been a lie told to sell you on the vaccines before revealing the expectation of permanent dependence on regular boosters. Unlike the Marek's vaccines which provide lifetime immunity from illness symptoms, the COVID ones don't even provide lasting immunity from symptoms and need boosters every few months in order to maximize profitability.
On top of all this, 100% vaccination rates are literally impossible thanks to people too old or too young to take them, people too infirm to take them, people allergic to ingredients in the shots, and so on. Even with 100% willingness you can't get 100% vaccination, and with a leaky vaccine that means the virus is never going away and there would always be people unvaccinated to experience the symptoms.
>there would always be people unvaccinated to experience the symptoms.
Not to mention people with fading immunity who need to be topped up but get symptoms before they get the next shot.
>The mRNA vaccines are leaky just like the Marek's disease vaccines.
I love how you phrased this to make it sound like the vaccines themselves are the virus. Very telling
>permanent dependence on regular boosters.
You mean like influenza? That's not very terrifying, despite your dramaticism. Kek.
>the COVID ones don't even provide lasting immunity from symptoms
Which is somehow the vaccine's fault to you, apparently. Like the vaccine came out before the virus.
You're right, I don't write like a neurotic ignoramus.
>much of what you call science, is theoretical, not proven.
Please tell me what I call science. There's quite a lot of it, and I could be unaware of something you're thinking of.
>scientists can be bribed and lie to you. you will believe these lies because they are scientists, and science is science, and we must believe the heckin science.
I'm sure you feel that way, but my ability to understand how these things work isn't as compromised as yours so I'll have to heartily disagree.
>if you know what the frick you're talking about, and read scientific journals, and aren't a moron frickhead, and don't believe everything the government and pharamceutical companies tell you, and you maintain a healthy air of skepticism, then science requires just a LITTLE WEENY bit of faith
With the premise granted, anything is possible. If you're a moron, you'll keep trying to justify your indefensible delusions of scientific comprehension requiring even a shred of faith. Fricking kek
I never said you can't or shouldn't. I'm merely notioning that proceletyzing is a waste of time, especially towards those that wish to base their lives of decisions grounded in the physical world and wouldn't approach theology to begin with. It only alienates yourself and them.
2 Corinthians 5:6-7
"6 Therefore we are always confident and know that as long as we are at home in the body we are away from the Lord. 7 For we live by faith, not by sight."
i've read most of your posts, and you haven't actually refuted anything. you've said nothing. you might as well be screaming AD HOMINEN, STRAWMAN, NON SEQUITUR like a redditor.
Your miscomprehension is no fault of mine. Elucidate or egress
suck my balls psued
You made no mistakes, anon. Ignore this silly pseud, he'll do everything he can to make you angry, it's how they function when they're wrong.
>Elucidate or egress
Pathetic
>I love how you phrased this to make it sound like the vaccines themselves are the virus.
I did not and don't even fricking know what you mean by this. I was drawing parallels between covid and Marek's and their vaccines.
>You mean like influenza?
Funny you bring that up since flu vaccines are incredibly unnecessary and almost no one gets them every year and no one fricking cares.
>Which is somehow the vaccine's fault to you, apparently.
Again, I don't even fricking know what this means.
yeah I'm dead set, I'm still going to follow Jesus Christ's commandment because I love Him.
John 14:15
If you love Me, you will keep My commandments.
>To think the vax itself is causing the virus to mutate is effectively insisting the vax doesn't work.
It observably does not. It only decreases the odds of a severe outcome with certain strains of covid. But at far too high a price as it also observably causes OAS in recipients. It also put pressure on covid to mutate the spike protein. We got lucky...so far...in that it did not permit more lethal mutations to dominate, another severe risk of imperfect vaccines. And one that could still occur in the future.
>Because cooperation wasn't achieved, we didn't achieve immunity.
That's not how it works. The measles vaccine does not depend on other people taking it to work. If you get it you are immune to measles (with very few, very rare exceptions). Even if you are the only person on Earth to get it. You can literally walk through a hospital ward with measles patients and not get measles.
A perfect coronavirus vaccine would not last forever like, say, a measles vaccine, because coronaviruses can mutate in ways which evade antibodies. But a perfect cv vaccine would still last years, and would NOT rely on anyone else getting it.
>Now that antivax has made rona an endemic, we have to live with it like we do with the flu.
God you are so fricking ignorant about viruses and immunology. Because of how covid mutates and because it has an animal reservoir, covid was endemic the day it evaded initial containment efforts in China. Even with a perfect covid vaccine delivered to every last living human being, it would have eventually made more rounds through humanity. It would have taken years, but it would have happened. That is unavoidable with a coronavirus.
but in the article, it says that constantly getting boosters every four months would make your immune system work too hard and possibly make you tired, not about the vax or just one shot being something that wreaks havoc on it...
if the vax is getting an immunoresponse from your body, it means it works.
You'll understand when you're older.
>It's called the hypothalamus, specifically the sexually dimorphic nucleus located in the medial preoptic area (POA) of the hypothalamus. That's right, your brain and your body are both sexually dimorphic. And you can get a mismatched pair, resulting in your brain sending out the wrong signals to your pituitary gland, causing the gland to excrete the wrong hormones for your organs.
>he actually believes this
That's not only not scientifically proven (trannies have male brains) but in the rare cases that someone has a severe glandular pathology, their bodies become deformed not their minds.
Just face it. Autogynephilia is not a genetic disease.
>Pfizer is a company, they are no figurehead.
>TRUST PFIZER but pfizer lied WELL THEY'RE NOT PERFECT
Holy shit this is dumb.
>More to the point, I'd bet they'd be more forthcoming if antivax wasn't in vogue, fashionista
>HURR PFIZER WOULDN'T HAVE HAD TO LIE IF YOU WOULD JUST TRUST THEM
And abused wives wouldn't be abused if they just wouldn't anger their husbands, right?
>>yet every single person I know with the "vaccine" keeps getting covid
>Because it mutates.
The spike protein targeted by the vaccines is the fastest mutating part of the virus. Natural immunity produces over 20 antibodies, most to parts of the virus which take years to mutate to AB evasion. Vaccine induced immunity produces one AB which only takes the virus months to evade. Worse, in most recipients the vaccines introduce OAS which means they will get covid over and over and over again. They will never produce the N-type ABs to other parts of the virus.
This is why you DO NOT introduce an imperfect vaccine into a population during a fricking pandemic. This isn't new info, we knew this back in the days of FRICKING POLIO. Hell, you really shouldn't use imperfect vaccines at all.
, myself and others I know who didn't get the vaccine have never gotten sick with covid.
>I'm sure you feel fine, which would tell me you're just used to feeling sick 24/7.
LOL what kind of fricking COPE is this? You think he always runs a fever? Always has severe aches and pains? So he just misses that he got covid because he always feels sick? And all the unvaccinated are like this? Really?
If you honestly believe this then your IQ is too low for this conversation. Stick to Legos and crayons. Oh...and don't eat the crayons.
>And you can get a mismatched pair...causing the gland to excrete the wrong hormones for your organs.
Let's see: do we fix this hormone imbalance? Or inject sterilizing hormones just before slicing off genitals? Hmmm
>You think you'd be seeing mass deaths by now if they weren't
Pic related. Keep in mind that before covid it was generally accepted that VAERS reports needed to be multiplied by 10x. So 28k death reports means ~280k actual deaths.
Back when the VAERS reports stood at ~16k a statistician testified before the FDA that by looking at Medicare data he could estimate 150-180k covid vaccine related deaths nationally. Two different approaches coming to roughly the same result. Now add in an unexplained increase in all cause mortality since the vaccines were released, which is the opposite of what we should see with covid subsiding.
>Shots went out, infection levels went down, virus mutates, levels go back up, more shots, levels go back down, etc ad nauseam.
Infection levels didn't go down. Admittedly severe outcomes and deaths from covid went down. But they still occurred in significant numbers among the vaccinated.
>Works better than herd complacency, excuse me, immunity.
No it fricking doesn't. We now have vaccinated people getting covid 2, 3, 4, and more times. Proof of Original Antigenic Sin (look it up and learn something). Something that is extremely fricking dangerous for a population. Something that caused thinking doctors in more rational times to reject imperfect vaccines. We knew about OAS when fricking polio was a problem.
>Yet, specific identifying characteristics in their brains defines them as belonging to the opposite sex.
Brain patterns do not indicate they "belong to the opposite sex", they merely indicate a form of dysmorphic disorder. The rational course would be to try to re-align their perceptions with their physical bodies. Not mutilate them with sterilizing hormones and surgeries to try and "treat" them. Do you gouge the eyes out of someone who identifies as blind?
>Because we don't have advanced brain surgery that can fix this,
Studies show some psych meds fix it. But we can't follow up on those studies because CurrentThing.
>it was generally accepted that VAERS reports needed to be multiplied by 10x
Fricking lmao, generally accpeted by who?
>>it was generally accepted that VAERS reports needed to be multiplied by 10x
>Fricking lmao, generally accpeted by who?
Every last fricking statistician who investigated VAERS reporting. VAERS is a voluntary system. The multiplier is actually much higher for less used vaccines/drugs and more rare conditions. But for a widely used vaccine/drug it's roughly 10x.
to authority
Was never made in that post.
>Dude trust me everyone says its x10
Yea im gonna need more info then that.
If the true number is x10 why dont they use that number instaid?
>>Dude trust me everyone says its x10
>Yea im gonna need more info then that.
Try Google.
>If the true number is x10 why dont they use that number instaid?
VAERS is a database of completed reports, not estimates of how many reports should have been made. It's clear you want to COPE about the vaccine being Safe&Effective(TM). But there are three problems...
1) Even 28k deaths should result in the vaccines being pulled, except perhaps for those at the highest risk from covid. FDA has pulled past vaccines for far, far less.
2) 28k deaths is incongruent with the increase in call cause mortality post-pandemic. 280k deaths is consistent with it. It's certainly possible that something else is spiking all cause mortality. But...
3) Medicare data is mandatory, and it indicates an adverse event rate, including deaths, at roughly 10x the VAERS reporting rate.
tl;dr - the vaccines are imperfect, mostly ineffective, and dangerous. I will grant that they reduce the odds of severe covid outcome in high risk individuals. But at what cost?
>appeal to authority
"Meds" are not actual medicine, its poison and just bland and boring version of street drugs.
>CurrentThing
Psychiatry is just past flavor of such.
Its not science, its cult and quackery.
What is everything then if not quarks and gluons
is this a fake tweet? can't find it on twitter
Thats because it is a fake tweet.
Yes, if you look up the phrases in it in quotes the only thing that comes up is a /misc/ thread.
What is the purpose for people to post fake news headlines and twitter screencaps? Every time I visit /misc/ there are several threads hitting 300+ posts because of a fake twitter screencap. Malevolent entities farming negative energy?
>Malevolent entities farming negative energy
I was thinking bored trolls farming (You)s but yeah same difference
>Malevolent entities farming negative energy?
just the negative energy. whoever's doing it doesn't really make a difference
>All dissenting ideas not following the settled doctrines of Science are problematic.
Is that why you have to falsify tweets?
So why isn’t the denial of Christ an infringement of religious freedom? Which would be moronic, just like this is totally fricking moronic and doesn’t make sense.
>PBS
>10 retweets
>48 likes
Why do you even take anything these losers say so seriously?
indeed
But the Big Bang isn't real. It's just a model used by scientists because it fits our current understanding of the universe.
Science fails to recognize the single most potent element of human existence
Feet
Just a couple of bros touching each other's inner thighs with BDSM shackles spilling out from under the bed skirt.
>homosexuals are just like us!
That's it, I'm fricking going Muslim now. Inshallah mother frickers.
Matthew 16:26
For what is a man profited, if he shall gain the whole world, and lose his own soul? or what shall a man give in exchange for his soul?
Matthew 6:1
"Be careful not to practice your righteousness in front of others to be seen by them. If you do, you will have no reward from your Father in heaven."
Oops, lol
Jesus talking about performing good works, and in particular giving to the needy. You are made righteous through your acts not your words. Acts of prayer, fasting, and giving to the poor and needy are the three eminent good works.
Matthew 6:2
“SO when you give to the needy, do not announce it with trumpets, as the hypocrites do in the synagogues and on the streets, to be honored by others. Truly I tell you, they have received their reward in full."
oops, lol
Proceletyzing is prayer. Preaching for the value of a soul is indeed giving to the needy. And quite publicly, at that.
Matthew 6:3-5
"But when you give to the needy, do not let your left hand know what your right hand is doing, 4 so that your giving may be in secret. Then your Father, who sees what is done in secret, will reward you.
5 “And when you pray, do not be like the hypocrites, for they love to pray standing in the synagogues and on the street corners to be seen by others. Truly I tell you, they have received their reward in full."
Oops indeed.
>proselytizing is prayer
That doesn't make sense. What you basically just said is that when someone prays, they are actively to convert God to a religion. That's not what prayer is.
Prayer is communication to The Father and to The Son and to The Holy Spirit. plain and simple.
When proselytizing, one can pray on behalf of the person they are trying to convert, but proselytizing in of itself does not constitute prayer.
>Preaching for the value of a soul is indeed giving to the needy.
Preaching is what Christ Himself calls us to do
Matthew 28:19
Therefore GO AND MAKE DISCIPLES of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit,
but it's not giving to the needy in the way Jesus Christ describes in chapter 6 of Matthew. Preaching is making people aware of Jesus Christ and His gift, that's it. What is given to the needy is Salvation and Eternal Life but Christians do not give that. Only Jesus Christ can give that.
To give, necessitates that you have that very thing to offer to another. But Christians can give food and clothing and shelter and medicine which is why Jesus Christ says in Matthew 6:2 to not announce with trumpets whenever you give to the needy.
So yeah, when
was preaching the Gospel he was doing the commandment of Jesus Christ to go and make disciples, not giving to the needy like you were trying to portray it as.
By the way, there is only one person in the Bible that tries to distort scripture and use it against Jesus Christ. Care to take a guess of who it was?
I didn't say "prayer is proceletyzing". (Prayer(Proceletyzing)), not (Proceletyzing(Prayer)).
The issue is regarding what determines a deciple. Becoming a deciple involves earnestly seeking spiritual advice (aka Going to Church), not being confronted in some public venue entirely disconnected from the spiritual world.
Christ can only give when you seek him. If the desciple is not the seeker, it is not true faith.
Matthew 7:21-23
"21 “Not everyone who says to me, ‘Lord, Lord,’ will enter the kingdom of heaven, but only the one who does the will of my Father who is in heaven. 22 Many will say to me on that day, ‘Lord, Lord, did we not prophesy in your name and in your name drive out demons and in your name perform many miracles?’ 23 Then I will tell them plainly, ‘I never knew you. Away from me, you evildoers!’"
So yes, make desciples of all nations. But they must seek it with consious earnest.
By the way, nice job dismissimg the word of God by likening my act of referencing it to Satan attempting to deceive Jesus, as if that logic couldn't possibly apply to yourself as well. God said make desciples of all nations, he didn't mean by force.
Deuteronomy 18:20
"But a prophet who presumes to speak in my name anything I have not commanded, or a prophet who speaks in the name of other gods, is to be put to death."
So, yeah. Oops!
Again you’re word playing and deliberately causing confusion to do the work of your father satan. There is no issue here, Jesus Christ specifically commands us to preach the Gospel and you tried telling some anon that he was in the wrong for doing so. By the way, how am I dismissing the Word of God when I’m the one advocating for preaching at all times whenever wherever while you’re saying that it shouldn’t be spread, especially in a public setting, and if you do share the Gospel it can only be to a settle chosen few that need to come to you first? But since you literally want to play devils advocate, here you go. Grab your Bible (If you even own one), go to Mark Chapter 16 Verse 15, and read it.
OOOPS!
True faith belongs only to those whom conciously and earnestly seek it. That means going to church. Forcing non-believers to hear your proceletyzing does nothing more than demonstrate your disdain for non-believers. Do you actually not trust the word of God to bring desciples to church? Have you no love for your fellow non-believers?
1 Corinthians 13:1-13
"If I speak in the tongues of men or of angels, but do not have love, I am only a resounding gong or a clanging cymbal. 2 If I have the gift of prophecy and can fathom all mysteries and all knowledge, and if I have a faith that can move mountains, but do not have love, I am nothing. 3 If I give all I possess to the poor and give over my body to hardship that I may boast, but do not have love, I gain nothing.
4 Love is patient, love is kind. It does not envy, it does not boast, it is not proud. 5 It does not dishonor others, it is not self-seeking, it is not easily angered, it keeps no record of wrongs. 6 Love does not delight in evil but rejoices with the truth. 7 It always protects, always trusts, always hopes, always perseveres.
8 Love never fails. But where there are prophecies, they will cease; where there are tongues, they will be stilled; where there is knowledge, it will pass away. 9 For we know in part and we prophesy in part, 10 but when completeness comes, what is in part disappears. 11 When I was a child, I talked like a child, I thought like a child, I reasoned like a child. When I became a man, I put the ways of childhood behind me. 12 For now we see only a reflection as in a mirror; then we shall see face to face. Now I know in part; then I shall know fully, even as I am fully known.
13 And now these three remain: faith, hope and love. But the greatest of these is love."
I'm not going to force you to acknowledge that fallen souls are still God's children. That said, only they can determine when their faith will return, not you.
the whole point of this argument was about preaching and how you thought an anon was in the wrong for doing so. True faith is a whole different topic. Ultimately when Jesus Christ commands us to preach the gospel to all creatures, I'm going to follow His orders over your orders to not preach. There is more than one way to preach you know that right? It's not just FIRE AND BRIMSTONE. You can have patience and kindness and humility in the way you share the gospel with everyone. I don't buy this idea that preachers are "forcing" non-believers to hear the Word of God when everyone was literally ignoring his comment (choosing not to engage and not to listen) but for whatever reason you were the one to single him out and told him not talk about the gospel.
fixing typos
they are actively to convert God to a religion*
Prayer is communicating**
lol typo again
they are actively TRYING to convert God to a religion*
it was the devil who tried to misinterpret God's Word and use it against Jesus Christ.
Luke 4:9-12
9 Then he brought Him to Jerusalem, set Him on the pinnacle of the temple, and said to Him, “If You are the Son of God, throw Yourself down from here. 10 For it is written:
‘He shall give His angels charge over you,
To keep you,’
11 and,
‘In their hands they shall bear you up,
Lest you dash your foot against a stone.’ ”
12 And Jesus answered and said to him, “It has been said, ‘You shall not tempt the Lord your God.’ ”
Psalm 91:11-12
11 For He shall give His angels charge over you,
To keep you in all your ways.
12 In their hands they shall bear you up,
Lest you dash your foot against a stone.
As already shown this is fake.
But frankly, I wouldn't even be mad.
Of course it's bullshit, the whole concept of basing legal arguments on religious freedom is stupid, but if creationists can use this to try to indocrinate our children and antivaxxers can use it to put society at risk, it seems only fair that Truth use these stupid mechanisms to fight back.
Of course, a truth-based, fact-based autocracy would be better. Conform to the facts or get thrown away like the trash you are. But unfortunately such is life.
dilate
Everybody why has kept their eyes open knows that there is a difference between science the method and Science the institute.
homosexuals however will use problems with the institute to justify their bullshit beliefs.
Science is the research, not of Truth, but Industrial truth. The goal of the research is to open up more research, leading to more work for other researchers infinitely, I don't have accurate numbers, but it wouldn't surprise me if the number of researchers is 10 times higher now than a century ago.
The goal of "industrial truth" isn't so much truth but economic development, meaning if one theory is wrong but useful to industry it will get pushed around. Some of it is capitalism vs communism, some of it does not depend on the economic system, but science can no longer be called truth.
I enjoy making fun of people like you. I am super scientific to the point where I actually understand pseudoscience as being something that ought to be testable. Like apparently phrenology can be used to trace genetic lineage. I’m learning very quickly that a lot of pseudoscientific theories are actually very accurate. Jung is actually what inspired the idea. Also be aware that if Reverse xcom is happening here, then xcom might be happening on earth. Like literal sea monsters being put on earth. Like uh. Earth and counter earth. You understand? Literally like marvel counter earth, the genetic totalitarian dictatorship or whatever. I enjoy this place but it’s mildly annoying. Also the imperium of man is really annoying. Like they’re trying to figure out if psychic or not. Like they’re saying this is North Korea and yeah I’m learning very quickly that they literally look for signs of alien life to kill here because they don’t understand that life is Star Trek land, and we’re all on the same genetic template. Like literal nazis who want people to be perfect and kill the perfect beings. I find this hysterical. I’m like a god here.
You sound like an absolute lunatic
>Science isn't a religion!
>Scientism is a schizo term!
>REJECTING SCIENCE VIOLATES MY RELIGIOUS FREEDOM
Glad they're making the state religion of Scientism official.
>Presence of religious faith, proven by finding burial rites, is the main difference between prehistoric primalism and the beginning of civilisation
Accept the science anon
What a weak pathetic take, taking literal bible interpretations is like a reading mistake 101. Besides it's not like religion is conflicting with science, quite the opposite I would say.
Not to mention the big bang in itself is barely even understood to begin with.
>Time literally doesn't exists
>Energy literally came out of nowhere
>Universe decides all of the sudden to exist
People will eat anything up to avoid this burden of responsibility for their actions.
if you're going to post fake tweets like this at least make sure they don't exceed the character limit ffs
>1st Amendment is designed to protect against various faiths from being suppressed
>California wants to reinterpret this to ensure that everyone who disagrees with the state is suppressed
lmao, liberals are fricking mental.
As said SEVERAL TIMES in the thread, the OP screencap is fake. If you internet search the text you get an iFunny link.
Disingenuous OP trying to make nonreligious people look insane
>Rejection of basic tenets such as evolution and the Big Bang theory
Holy shit California is a third-world country. Not even the most prestigious astrophysicists believe that the Big Bang theory is the whole picture. In fact, we know it is wrong because it predicts a singularity at the beginning of the universe.
how can it be a religion if Science doesn't believe in the existence of a God?
science doesn't believe anything. if god were proven to be real, it would become part of our growing scientific understanding.
science = god
moronic journalists = priests
>big bang theory was proposed by a catholic priest and one of his greatest opponents for years was unironically Einstein
So… state enforced atheism
That tweet does not exist. But this thread has 101 replies.
/x/, never change.
More or less. Why? Because it's what does the job of actually explaining the world around us. And it is completely susceptible to changing in the future based on new information. Meanwhile religion has none of these qualities.
science is just a tool used to understand God better
This thread has turned into dogshit. Just wanted to throw my worthless opinion in as well.
AHAHAHAH. IM JUST NOT GOING TO TAKE IT. SORRY, I AM JUST NEVER GOING TO TAKE THE VAX, I KNOW I KNOW IM SO SORRY AHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAH
>Evolution is a Scientific fact.
Anon, can you explain how humans can breed different type of dogs without using evolution principles like mutation and natural/artificial selection?
>Climate change is a Scientific fact.
What if it's real but humans aren't as impactful as they claim. ie. Ice Age
>how humans can breed different type of dogs without using evolution principles like mutation and natural/artificial selection
Where would evolution and natural selection come into play when breeding dogs? You're just using words you don't understand. Breeding implies artificial selection. Evolution and natural selection do not apply when breeding animals, as those are processes that take millions of years to create small changes. Breeding the many types of dogs we have today has only taken a few thousand years, but as they all originated from wolves, it's a pretty obvious proof that biology is highly flexible and dramatic changes within in a species is possible, so why wouldn't it be possible over long time spans too?
Honk honk
~~*Science*~~ has failed our world
On the contrary, it's working exactly as intented.
As ~~*they*~~ intended yea
How do you cope? I am lost
That's what I mean. Science as it is isn't "failing," it was designed to be a religion. This was an intentional outcome.
Yes it seems all devout ~~*scientists*~~ are in favor of and adamantly working towards ~~*their*~~ technologically determinant transhuman agenda
But how do you cope in the reality? How does one cope? I am lost and weary. Faith in myself comes and goes
Faith in God is the best answer I think. And you also need to disconnect from the beast system and find camaraderie off the internet. People in real life are a lot better than people online.
I have two friends who are like my brothers, thankfully. I struggle with the concept of finding work and contributing to society though. Any thoughts on that? Sorry for laying this all on you
Even if you feel society at large can't be saved, you should find a community that can be. Because ultimately, your work is for the people around you. Avoid soulless corpo jobs if possible, or if you find one that pays well milk it for all you can and use that to build a family and help your community.
Thank you
Yes, its flat.
>Evolution is a Scientific fact. Round Earth is a Scientific fact. Climate change is a Scientific fact
Do you really believe any of these aren't true? I mean, I hate how dogmatic science has become, but these are pretty cut and dry, especially the shape of the Earth for frick's sake
>Round Earth is a Scientific fact.
Nobody takes conspiracy theories seriously because of you idiots.
Science cuck thinking all science is fact; no science points us to truth, i agree some truths will remain constant but your putting to much faith ironically into science.
science is always right because science is always changing
sad part is libs will read that and say "so true!"
ni
you look like this
This will never happen. All of these are just theories, nobody has figured the exact in and outs of the universe yet. Dark matter still baffles scientists. There is no unifed theory on the reason for the existence of the universe, all scientific speculation. If they ever figure it out, sure, why the frick not, 1+1=2 and that's law but right now they don't know what the universe exactly how it began or will end.
i hope they never do determine how the universe was created - would be a real drain on our motivation to find shit out. discovering how the universe will end could have the opposite effect - especially if we invent teleporters to stop it from happening by moving mass around to either prevent a big crunch or delay heat death. of course i'm kidding because we'll all probably be dead by then
Impressionable moron triggered by clickbait, the israelite is pleased with you. Now go pray to the israelite god, or you won't go to the garden in the clouds after your death