why do those high in secret societies recommend this book so often

why do those high in secret societies recommend this book so often

Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14

CRIME Shirt $21.68

Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14

  1. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Nobody cares about mentally moronic homosexuals or what books they read

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >The Art Of English Poesie, first edition. In it the high Elizabethan minds describe to you the art of spelling and enchantment, as well as all the arts of hiding messages in text, in plain sight, for those in the know. The message of the book was largely lost in reprinting, you need a FACSIMILE edition of the first edition of the work. You can easily find and download it. It's by the same people who were Shakespeare, the Society of Letters. They are responsible for the Enlightenment and their enemies are essentially the usual suspects, who of course emulate their methods.
      https://sourcetext.files.wordpress.com/2017/12/arte_english_posie_1589.pdf
      https://archive.org/details/bim_early-english-books-1475-1640_the-arte-of-english-poes_puttenham-george_1589/page/n5/mode/2up?view=theater

      wtf this sounds legit though

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        bump. looks interesting. would love a qrd. It would take a while to read through 300 pages of that.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          It would take a week or two at most if you put any effort at all in, lmao.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            I think it may take longer, olde english is hard to read sometimes, and I am very unfamiliar with shakespear and the way those stories are written. The language is really chunky, it takes a lot of processing to understand it.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            its not that hard, context clues really do make much off it easier than you'd think.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            I read in Shakespeare's day there was actually only like 30 thousand words but today we have over half a million and in a way the average person is much smarter than Shakespeare

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            >in a way the average person is much smarter than Shakespeare

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            >olde english is hard to read sometimes, and I am very unfamiliar with shakespear and the way those stories are written
            Shakespear is not Old English, and it's not hard to read. At worst, it takes a paragraph or two to get used to the prose, and then it's no different than anything written today, because it's written in Modern English. Beowulf is something written in Old English, and if you look up the actual text, it's legitimately another language.
            >Hwæt! We Gardena in geardagum
            >þeodcyninga, þrym gefrunon
            > hu ða æþelingas ellen fremedon
            People who Shakespear "hard to read" and "Old English" are some of the most illiterate pussies on the planet, and can't read something written in the modern version of their own language which they speak every day. If anybody ever refers to Shakespear as "Old English" you should disregard any opinions he proposes about literature and writing from that point on, and end your connections to him.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            Correct. Old english is like the original beowulf. Now *that* is hard to read.

          • 2 months ago
            no, buddy

            It's not the modern english we speak every day, and depending on your background it could be very far removed from the way you speak english. That's what makes comparing dialects so interesting.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            taking it even further, shakespeare and the writers of the king james bible made modern english what it is today. the biggest hurdle is probably the archaic spelling which just needs a little adaptation. guess its kind of like how black people cant read cursive

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            >kind of like how black people cant read cursive
            what now?

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            did i stutter

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            Can any brothers on this cursed site read this?

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            NO

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            The current generation isnt taught cursive

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        Intredasting

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        >They are responsible for the Enlightenment
        Idk how they determined that but it’s bullshit and here’s why:

        The printing press lowered costs and increased production rates of books in England and this increased access to books lead to teachers doubling the literacy rate in England over the course of 150 years from ~30% to 70%.

        “The enlightenment” was caused first and foremost by working class teachers, leveraging advances in technology, to educate normies at a faster rate. It was essentially their equivalent to a technological singularity.

        The ability to access knowledge (primarily French and German literature) with improvements in technology, is what lead to “the enlightenment”, not a bunch of circlejerking poetry geeks.

        LITERALLY (see what I did there?) no one would have even been able to read any Shakespearian works in the first place were it not for working class teachers and printing presses giving regular homies access to information that was previously only available to the British aristocracy.

        https://i.imgur.com/81Tgs3n.png

        why do those high in secret societies recommend this book so often

        Secret societies probably recommend it because they think that it helps them write better psyops.

  2. 2 months ago
    Anonymous
    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous
      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous
  3. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    wtf

  4. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Is there a retyped version using modern typography and spelling?

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      It's not that hard to read but it takes time.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        And comprehension

  5. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >secret societes

    that shit is so 2013

  6. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Most people live in a world of words and abstractions that create their perception of reality. This is a prison and also causes literal delusion(removed perception from the true nature of things) in the individual. If I had to guess this book is probably an insight into the manipulative and creative nature inherently hidden in language, since you mention secret socieites, but even without malignant intentions it could still provide useful insight.

    I remember a similar book written by some schizo recommended years ago here called The Language Crystal. I am guessing its probably some sort of weird philip k dick esque rechanneling of it

  7. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    The fact that you guys can't understand that it's a book about poetry and metaphor than you're fricking lost. No really, I'd love and hate to see what some of your explanations are for 'black magic and white magic' if thats what you get from this. Learn to fricking read morons, it's a book literally about how to read and write between the lines, how slow can you honestly be?

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      a lot of magical text and alchemy as well is hidden behind poetic phrase, its not that surprising that a book on poetry could contain hidden meaning

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        The is absolutely no hidden meaning in this book. It's a book about what it means to have hidden meanings and how to write hidden meanings and why people do it!

        Like Jesus Christ people there's actually no way you're this autistic. It's not hard to decipher just fricking read it and you will see I'm right, like it's not rocket science, it's not the Da Vinci code, it's a medieval essay on English literature for academics and scholars of that age. That's it that's all, a glorified thesis turned textbook.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          I have not even read it anon, Im just saying its possible, why are you so ass hurt about this?

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            No it's literally not possible and I mean L I T E R A L L Y NOT. It was scripture like this and others that compounded into the bullshit that did eventually become the mechanisms of secrets being layered within literature. That's why you can't listen to people when they say the bibles something coded, it's not because people didn't even comprehend language in this respect yet. You're looking at a L I T E R A L grandparent to "secret messages" being disguised with poetic meaning but not the exact Rosetta stone for the totality of such a literal and extrapolated writing device.

            I'm trying to help you by being upset with you.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            the frick is wrong with you? did the book frick your mother?

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            The OP only suggests that secret societies would have read this book, not that it itself has secret messages, and nobody really mentioned magic before you.

            Allowing your anger to control the tone of your posting will only hurt the quality of discourse ITT. I think if you take a step back you'll realize this.

            also learn the difference between negative and positive reinforcement

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          No it's literally not possible and I mean L I T E R A L L Y NOT. It was scripture like this and others that compounded into the bullshit that did eventually become the mechanisms of secrets being layered within literature. That's why you can't listen to people when they say the bibles something coded, it's not because people didn't even comprehend language in this respect yet. You're looking at a L I T E R A L grandparent to "secret messages" being disguised with poetic meaning but not the exact Rosetta stone for the totality of such a literal and extrapolated writing device.

          I'm trying to help you by being upset with you.

          t. scion of the black nobility
          i cant tell if youre just a genuinely autistic person, trying to run defense, or trying to do some reverse psychology freemason recruiting campaign. bravo

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            I think they're just angry and stupid

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Barely anyone in the thread is talking about esoteric shit, just subtext and it's uses and the availability of the book. There's no reason to be this inflammatory.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        I'm being inflammatory? Not the post trying to obfuscate a thesis on English from the medieval ages to look like some sort of magical book red by people in the NWO?

        Get a grip.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          The OP only suggests that secret societies would have read this book, not that it itself has secret messages, and nobody really mentioned magic before you.

          Allowing your anger to control the tone of your posting will only hurt the quality of discourse ITT. I think if you take a step back you'll realize this.

  8. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >hiding messages in text in plain sight

    https://narrativecode.substack.com/p/narrative-code

    https://decodingsymbols.wordpress.com/2023/09/12/full-intro/

    https://sleepydude.substack.com/p/the-comms-pitch/

    https://decodingsymbols.wordpress.com/2021/09/08/nuclear-q/

    https://decodingsymbols.wordpress.com/2021/08/14/asteroids-and-comets/

    https://sleepydude.substack.com/p/dog-comms-examples

    https://sleepydude.substack.com/p/quick-comms-sun

    https://decodingsymbols.wordpress.com/2021/01/30/comms-list-short-placeholders/

    https://sleepydude.substack.com/p/comms-dictionary

    https://sleepydude.substack.com/s/symbol-comms-acroamatic-messages/archive?sort=new

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Also perhaps

      ancient-spooks.de

  9. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Pseudo intellectual larpers

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *