Which Gods are female?

Well, since gender is not really applicable to them, what I mean is - which Gods have strong feminine traits? I would like to worship some God, but I'm not keen on worshipping a war-god whose followers trampled over others like with christian religion. So far the only one that comes to mind is Aphrodite, but I would like someone more active and ambitious who actively seeks more followers and wants to influence the material world just not in an overt way through force

A Conspiracy Theorist Is Talking Shirt $21.68

Nothing Ever Happens Shirt $21.68

A Conspiracy Theorist Is Talking Shirt $21.68

  1. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Women are hellspawns so satanism?

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      this is not r9k incel

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Have sex(with me), incel

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          I doubt you would like that considering im a fat baldy guy but i might x

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Don't you think it's time to lose the weight and reverse the hair loss?
            You await salvation that never comes.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Nah not when ive got fitties like you flirting with me x
            You got a problem with me belly does it upset you xx

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            It's true, my body is apparently in great shape but I worry about my organ health, you know.
            I don't have a problem with your belly, I'm not going to hurt you for it but others will exclude you for it.
            If you turn things around, others in your life will be impressed, inspired and do the same.
            Your "soulmate" is eating the same junk you are, every night doing the same thing letting go, but when you change so does your "soulmate."

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >don't have a problem with your belly, I'm not going to hurt you for it but others will exclude you for it
            Lmao are you 19? A lot of people beyond 30 could not give a frick if you're fat. It would defo only be stuck up twats at 35 caring if im a bit fat
            >Your "soulmate" is eating the same junk you are, every night doing the same thing letting go, but when you change so does your "soulmate.
            Pahahhaa mate I could not give a frick
            Genuienly funny that you think being fat is that deep. We're not on the playground kid. My body gives me power, pure sweaty breasts slapping ya face

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            I feel like you are manipulating me, and attempting to phish out personal information.
            If this is a casual discussion I don't mind sharing about myself, my age BMI whatever.
            You're making me feel like a target.
            I've done nothing to instigate you and no, I do not pity you.
            It's time to change.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            I was just messing with you but that's a bit of a heavy reply
            Why are you so paranoid?

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            I'm not paranoid. I know that anything that can happen already has or will.
            I'm not here to shitpost like you are.

            What kind of c**t doesn't like children or puppies? At worst I can imagine them as indifferent.

            I like to see a child standing up to his bully.
            I like to see a dog trying to catch the ball.
            That is how I am.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >I'm not paranoid. I know that anything that can happen already has or will.
            >I'm not here to shitpost like you are.
            It's just humour. Weirdest reaction I have received in a while on EerieWeb lol
            You seem mentally ill and I actually feel awkward and sorry for you

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            You're making this very personal, and let's be real, none of us are actually anonymous.
            Well, personally I don't have much time for clowns and jesters or comedy on TV.
            It's hard to smile in a world with genocidal purges and children rotting teeth out living in Shri Lanka.
            I'm approaching my 30's and there's no apparent man in my life.
            So I'd rather spend my time reflecting.
            What you call paranoia, I call it vigilance.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            What if I raped you? Would that help?

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            If you think you are having you way with me, the truth is that I'm having my way with you.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            I hope things get better for you. I am going to bed now.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            <3

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >Well, personally I don't have much time for clowns and jesters or comedy on TV
            You come across as very mechnical like a souless insect or some shit
            >It's hard to smile in a world with genocidal purges and children rotting teeth out living in Shri Lanka
            Oh shut up you are fricking clown never mind the tv. Stop acting like a victim when your biggest problem is being a head case
            >What you call paranoia, I call it vigilance
            You are an actual wierdo. I did feel sorry for you but you've got this dead energy
            How can you type any of that out without feeling like a tit

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >You come across as very mechnical like a souless insect or some shit
            It doesn't matter how I come across because we both walk away from this as better people.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Why are talking like a npc in a video game? Do you even know what you're saying. That was random

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            You seem to communicate similarly to how I communicate.
            You seem to hold some uncommon ideas that I hold as well.
            Let's have a conversation?
            gg/4mgvgMW6

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            I won't be able to accept that challenge. Sorry.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            I wouldn't consider it a challenge.
            I prefer peaceful communication, as I wish no harm upon anyone.
            I suppose that you remind me of myself.
            Which I tend to see as potential for sanity.
            Though, I suppose that you didn't agree to communicate last time we were here, either.
            Or the prior few times.
            I've lost count anyways.

          • 1 month ago
            JOTS

            "Still holding out hope that you'll find "
            NUL
            "?"
            "That one seems to have some paranoia, a bit of an ego."
            "You'd find better candidates "
            NUL
            "."

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            And anyway you were joking with me to begin with then ypu weirdly switched up like a schizo

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Better question is
      >what female god i can fap to

      based answer, but im not going to cum to transfreak demons, filled with semen thirsty assworms.

  2. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Gods are to be feared and respected, not worshipped.
    Female gods included.

    A god that demands worship is vain and narcissistic, it is not challenging you or making you better.
    The god is never a part of you, or within you, it is outside and looks down on you like a child or a dog.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      What kind of c**t doesn't like children or puppies? At worst I can imagine them as indifferent.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        they post, on EerieWeb

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Literally completely wrong. "Gods" are just like us, literally just occupying a higher plane of existence. In fact they often suffer from the same problems we do. Frankly they fear humanity, as we can surpass everyone if we are left unchecked for even a second. That's why we are under such surveillance, such manipulation

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >Literally completely wrong.
        This is not a disagreement of opinions.
        We cannot acknowledge that gods are real or unreal.
        To say that I'm "completely wrong" means your head is so far up your own butt that you can only see one view.
        My god hates weaklings and pathetic cowards.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          I mean I've literally had multiple run-ins with divine entities and even beat one up in a fight because they jump-scared me when I was high as balls on DMT, but whatever you do you, believe whatever you want it literally doesn't matter as long as you're not an butthole who created more suffering than they alleviated, lol!

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            You went to a better school than I, right?
            So why do you type in run-on sentences.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            I'm self-taught, pal. Yeah I went to public school but public school in Texas is the worst in the Union. Plus, who gives a frick? I went to uni and got not one, but two bachelor's degrees. Doesn't mean I'm gonna format my every little sentence in Chicago-Turabian format. I don't give a shit, this is EerieWeb not some fricking peer-reviewed research paper.

            Frick if anything I had a worse starting-point than you for spiritual enlightenment, there truly is no excuse in the world. Gods are literally just beings who exist at a higher vibrational frequency than us, doesn't mean they're better than us. Frick, if anything they would in all likelihood never be able to ascend to higher frequencies if they were born on Earth - Earth is a corrupted, unfinished, bugged-out world that is incredibly difficult to ascend from. I mean incredibly difficult. It's like playing Halo 2 on legendary with all the difficulty multiplier skulls on. You can totally do it, but it's really hard and not fun 😛

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >this is EerieWeb not some fricking peer-reviewed research paper.
            EerieWeb is as serious & mature as its user base & personally I was never one to go with the flow.
            Of course we are all at home on a wednesday without obligations but why should we be wasting time clowning around.

            >You can totally do it, but it's really hard and not fun 😛
            That is how you understand the burden of responsibility master-chief actually has on his shoulders.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            My life path is 11 and I am the seventh and final male in my lineage. I am the 117th, lol. All you can do is roll with the punches. Also, I'm not free or at home rn, I'm just passing time at work farting around on the app lol

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      But the narcissist is a character in a book that died in a reflective body of water. I don't think Narcissism is real; that's like typing "A god that demands worship is vain and iornmanistic".

  3. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >Daddy is mean, so I would rather go live with one of his rebellious children instead

    The "gods" hate every single one of us. You know that, right?

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      They don't hate me. I am a nice little boy

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        They hate you because Daddy loves you more than them.

        Your parents were bad, and it shaped your worldview.
        You just don't know it yet.
        Gods might as well be figments of our imagination.
        They set healthy limitations on us.

        Never knew my folks, so your opinion is irrelevant.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          >Never knew my folks, so your opinion is irrelevant.
          It's not my opinion, it's psychology.
          I had a bad upringing as well and I would say similar things as you.
          When you say gods hate us, it's like a dog saying "master hates us."

          A god would tell you, no ice cream before dinner.
          You might not understand why unless you think about it.
          Gods set limitations and teach.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            [...]
            Think of it this way. Nietzsche said that "god is dead, god has left and abandoned us."
            The truth is that Nietzsche's parents did just that.

            Neither of you are picking up what I'm putting down and it's kind of hilarious. I'm saying the gods of the ancient world are the fallen Elohim.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Different anon here, I'm aware. I'm trying to get them to abdicate from their positions of power so I can finally ascend as the new boss cat of this dump. I don't really want the job but at this point it's so obvious to damn near everyone that I need to fix this shithole up because damn they really let this place go lol

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            I'm trying to remain sensitive to your beliefs but you should know better than to purport your own belief as universal fact.
            I know nothing of this "elohim" and I consider the possibility that modern day will one day be the ancient world.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Your parents were bad, and it shaped your worldview.
      You just don't know it yet.
      Gods might as well be figments of our imagination.
      They set healthy limitations on us.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      They hate you because Daddy loves you more than them.

      [...]
      Never knew my folks, so your opinion is irrelevant.

      Think of it this way. Nietzsche said that "god is dead, god has left and abandoned us."
      The truth is that Nietzsche's parents did just that.

  4. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >since gender is not really applicable to them
    are you a moron?
    male and female are a divine attribute and have specific realms of powers related to divinity

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      There is nothing divine about male and female.
      There is nothing mystical about penis or vegana as they both get gonhorrea syphilis you name it.

      Male and female is stamen and pistil.
      In human relationships it is a matter of who does tending, and who does roaming.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        complete nonsense
        the chalice to be filled and the ability to fill it is a divine attribute
        its not just a deities own sense of self
        denying male and female is denying godhood and creation

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          This is a matter of role specialization and limitations.
          Because if we could reproduce asexually, every idiot man or woman would be spewing and puking out children there would be dead bodies piled higher than a skyscraper.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          You've not reached nondualism yet.

  5. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    I want a pact
    3 wives
    Selena Gomez
    Nora Lum
    Kathryn Newton

    I will pay in semen inside their pussies
    Thanks Advance, goddesses

  6. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Do you really think the human concept of femininity is something that matters or is even applicable to a god

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      If you've done DMT or mushrooms you alrwady know the answer to this question: the human concept of "femininity" is a limited and misnamed representation of a state/quality/etc of the divine, and it/they are much better at whatever that thing is than we are but will happily use our concepts when communicating with us if it helps.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Femininity is only as divine as an electrical socket.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Anon can you please tell me more about what you mean? I did a bunch of shrooms and merged for a while with this female entity and ive been all strange ever since. Nothing bad, just different and weird

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          You and I have this concept in our heads called "femininity." If I were to describe mine, and you were to describe yours, the definitions wouldn't be identical, but there would be some overlap (especially because we aren't "just" two random people, but two people who have self-selected into anonymous internet communities and therefore have at least that in common). But, I bet if you were to take a complete survey of all women who have ever existed, and compare that to either of our definitions, neither would really fit.

          Well, why? When we say "femininity," when any male philosopher or theologian has referenced this "femininity," are we all just referencing a completely made up definition that both of us just happened to invent? Well, that is one explanation, but since you've done shrooms and met, for lack of a better term, "her," you know that's either nonsense or not at least not complete picture of what's actually happening.

          How it looks to me: you and I and everyone else has this particular fundamental idea, and for whatever reason, we have culturally assigned that idea to women. But women only sometimes overlap that idea, in the same ways men only sometimes overlap with what we call masculinity. So we have mixed together the actual behavior of men and women with these concepts. But the concept refers to "something" much deeper than just the physical behavior of physical men and women. The physical behavior of men and women is a very warped, very imperfect representation of whatever that "something" is. And the best definition of what that "something" is, is "however it is that the 'her' you meet on shrooms acts."

          I can't tell you what the merging meant. Nor should I: you are the only one who will be able to understand it, because "she" did that specific thing to you, and it was within the context of your own mental landscape that it makes the most sense. But this merging something that happens often in spirituality.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        https://i.imgur.com/n838tir.jpg

        You and I have this concept in our heads called "femininity." If I were to describe mine, and you were to describe yours, the definitions wouldn't be identical, but there would be some overlap (especially because we aren't "just" two random people, but two people who have self-selected into anonymous internet communities and therefore have at least that in common). But, I bet if you were to take a complete survey of all women who have ever existed, and compare that to either of our definitions, neither would really fit.

        Well, why? When we say "femininity," when any male philosopher or theologian has referenced this "femininity," are we all just referencing a completely made up definition that both of us just happened to invent? Well, that is one explanation, but since you've done shrooms and met, for lack of a better term, "her," you know that's either nonsense or not at least not complete picture of what's actually happening.

        How it looks to me: you and I and everyone else has this particular fundamental idea, and for whatever reason, we have culturally assigned that idea to women. But women only sometimes overlap that idea, in the same ways men only sometimes overlap with what we call masculinity. So we have mixed together the actual behavior of men and women with these concepts. But the concept refers to "something" much deeper than just the physical behavior of physical men and women. The physical behavior of men and women is a very warped, very imperfect representation of whatever that "something" is. And the best definition of what that "something" is, is "however it is that the 'her' you meet on shrooms acts."

        I can't tell you what the merging meant. Nor should I: you are the only one who will be able to understand it, because "she" did that specific thing to you, and it was within the context of your own mental landscape that it makes the most sense. But this merging something that happens often in spirituality.

        So the male/female duality we see in nature is repeated in "higher" (so to speak) or different planes of existence?

        Genuinely curious, by the way, not trying to disagree or anything, it's just that whenever I see people discussing the nature of the divine they tend to anthropomorphize things too much. I have no experience with psychedelics so I may be talking out of my ass.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          >So the male/female duality we see in nature is repeated in "higher" (so to speak) or different planes of existence?
          Kind of, but getting into the minutae of details and wording is kind of pointless, for the reasons you point out. The human brain is only "designed" to deal with a very specific problem, which is to hunt megafauna in groups using tools. Every other act of human cognition is built on this basic scaffolding. It's why, for example, we have such difficulty with astronomical distances: we're only really equipped to visualize the distance between us and a mammoth, and only equipped to keep track of migration pattern distances in sequential chunks.

          So what do we do when we do want to discuss an astronomical distance, or an atomic one? We used a simplified and modified story: scientific notation.
          >The distance between us and the next star? That's hard to visualize...
          >Okay, so you know the number 4? Imagine a number slightly higher than that, 4.068. If you multiply 4.068 by this other huge number, that's the distance in km between us and the closest star.
          >That other huge number? Well, take 10, and multiply it by itself 16 times...
          You and I cannot visualize what 4.068*10^16 actually is. No human can, it's just not how the brain works. What we can do is keep track of 4, 0.68, 10, and 16, and use those tools to achieve some goal: in this case, comparing the distances between us and various celestial bodies. But while that tool is useful, it is just a crude estimation of whatever the actual value is, a value which itself is not consistent etc.

          In a similar way, what you and I call "femininity" and "masculinity" is a crude estimation of a much more fundamental thing. "Masculinity" and "femininity" are concepts that are tied to that simple mental scaffolding of hunting megafauna in groups with tools. But similar to how scientific notation is "getting at" the more fundamental value of the distance, "femininity" is "getting at" whatever "she" is.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            [...]
            Granted, you are also correct that it's generally a mistake to anthropomorphize nature. Viruses do not have intent, and if you model them as though they do have intent, you can cause absolute disasters like we saw (or rather, the ongoing immune escape crisis) with the government response to covid. But the difference is that the divine IS trying to make contact with us. It self-athropomorphizes, in a way that "feels" both artificial but sincere.

            Imagine you could talk to Proxima Centuri, and it was interested in speaking to humans. You could ask it directly how far away it was. If it just showed you the distance, again, your mind couldn't really handle it. But if you were to, somehow, explain to it what a kilometer was, what scientific notation was, etc, eventually it could give you a more precise number than 4.068*10^16. It would use the tools you have in your mental framework to communicate with you. Now, obviously stars don't actually have intent and they don't communicate with humans or desire to, but whatever the divine actually is, it has "something" that is well approximated with the word intent. And when it has the intent to communicate with you, it uses the tools in your mental toolbox, including the concept of femininity. It self-anthropomorphizes, which is why I think that doing so is less of a mistake than anthropomorphizing nature itself.

            You've given me some things to thing about and research, usually most of /x/ would either dismiss these questions or say that I just don't get it, so it's much appreciated.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          >So the male/female duality we see in nature is repeated in "higher" (so to speak) or different planes of existence?
          Kind of, but getting into the minutae of details and wording is kind of pointless, for the reasons you point out. The human brain is only "designed" to deal with a very specific problem, which is to hunt megafauna in groups using tools. Every other act of human cognition is built on this basic scaffolding. It's why, for example, we have such difficulty with astronomical distances: we're only really equipped to visualize the distance between us and a mammoth, and only equipped to keep track of migration pattern distances in sequential chunks.

          So what do we do when we do want to discuss an astronomical distance, or an atomic one? We used a simplified and modified story: scientific notation.
          >The distance between us and the next star? That's hard to visualize...
          >Okay, so you know the number 4? Imagine a number slightly higher than that, 4.068. If you multiply 4.068 by this other huge number, that's the distance in km between us and the closest star.
          >That other huge number? Well, take 10, and multiply it by itself 16 times...
          You and I cannot visualize what 4.068*10^16 actually is. No human can, it's just not how the brain works. What we can do is keep track of 4, 0.68, 10, and 16, and use those tools to achieve some goal: in this case, comparing the distances between us and various celestial bodies. But while that tool is useful, it is just a crude estimation of whatever the actual value is, a value which itself is not consistent etc.

          In a similar way, what you and I call "femininity" and "masculinity" is a crude estimation of a much more fundamental thing. "Masculinity" and "femininity" are concepts that are tied to that simple mental scaffolding of hunting megafauna in groups with tools. But similar to how scientific notation is "getting at" the more fundamental value of the distance, "femininity" is "getting at" whatever "she" is.

          Granted, you are also correct that it's generally a mistake to anthropomorphize nature. Viruses do not have intent, and if you model them as though they do have intent, you can cause absolute disasters like we saw (or rather, the ongoing immune escape crisis) with the government response to covid. But the difference is that the divine IS trying to make contact with us. It self-athropomorphizes, in a way that "feels" both artificial but sincere.

          Imagine you could talk to Proxima Centuri, and it was interested in speaking to humans. You could ask it directly how far away it was. If it just showed you the distance, again, your mind couldn't really handle it. But if you were to, somehow, explain to it what a kilometer was, what scientific notation was, etc, eventually it could give you a more precise number than 4.068*10^16. It would use the tools you have in your mental framework to communicate with you. Now, obviously stars don't actually have intent and they don't communicate with humans or desire to, but whatever the divine actually is, it has "something" that is well approximated with the word intent. And when it has the intent to communicate with you, it uses the tools in your mental toolbox, including the concept of femininity. It self-anthropomorphizes, which is why I think that doing so is less of a mistake than anthropomorphizing nature itself.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          "Feminine" and "Masculine" are basically like saying Lewis Acid or Lewis Base in chemistry when it comes to higher planes.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            that's the TL:DR of it.

            it means nothing in the spiritual world its just a meme. that's why you see the spirit world like black and white tiles. with "stuff inside"

  7. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    None

  8. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    : All of them who Experienced being one.

  9. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    You're really going to have spell out how you're having trouble with this one, man. Surely there's some "List of goddesses" Wikipedia article you could have started with even in the shocking event that Aphrodite really is the only one you've heard of?

  10. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    "There is only one God, and He is Male; there are no other female gods "before" Him." ~anon.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >There is only one God, and
      she is black. What if God was one of us? Just a slob like one of us?

  11. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    That's a hard requirement because almost every goddess has had to fight at some time. I suggest Gaia or Freya.

  12. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    My wife is the supreme avatar of the Divine Feminine. She's a dragon goddess too! We met a long, long time ago, lost touch a few thousand years ago, and then I got back in touch with her a few months ago by writing some love letters addressed to the universe. She's on her way here now, but it'll be a few months at least, but soon!

  13. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Jesus is the one true living God. Repent.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Stick your cross up your backside then crucify yourself on it, Christcuck!

  14. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    No.37666877
    this the divine femanine is all female
    the divine masuline is all male/

    hence the yin / yang

    there are very few male daemons and very few female angels.
    but both exist.
    just not on the whole.
    as a result angels and daemons know each other, reproduced off springs and so on but its very rare still and looked down on by their masters.

  15. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >Nature is limited to the human experience okay!!11

    I guess asexual creatures don't exist by that standard.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *