What are the implications of this discovery?

What are the implications of this discovery?

Black Rifle Cuck Company, Conservative Humor Shirt $21.68

DMT Has Friends For Me Shirt $21.68

Black Rifle Cuck Company, Conservative Humor Shirt $21.68

  1. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    The observation suggest that something fundamental might be missing or misunderstood in our current model of the universe.

    Current theories primarily view dark energy as a cosmological constant with uniform properties across space and time. The characteristics of dark energy might not be constant or as previously understood.

    Dark energy, which is thought to drive the accelerated expansion of the universe, possibly has properties that can evolve over time or vary across space, challenging the idea of it being a uniform force with constant density and effect throughout the cosmos.

    If dark energy interacts with matter or varies in any way, it could lead to new understandings of cosmic expansion and help resolve the Hubble tension --the discrepancy between the measurements of the universe's expansion rate obtained through different methods.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      It doesn't cause expansion because it has gravity. That's the cosmic ocean.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      If the expansion isn't constant or it varies over vast distances, doesn't that potentially imply the big bang theory is either incomplete, or that the universe could be far older than we currently estimate? To say nothing of redshift of intergalactic objects.

      Either way I'm excited to see what new discoveries are made. Science is working as intended. Our model of the universe is only a model, so updates are a feature, not a flaw. If we're wrong, we'll learn it and try again, smarter for it. The awe of the universe only deepens with understanding.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        > doesn't that potentially imply the big bang theory is either incomplete
        The Big Bang theory is literally “uhhhh we don’t know dude, it just showed up one day” it doesn’t really get more incomplete than that.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          >is too moronic to read about the big bang
          >doesn't know what it is
          >assumes no one knows what it is and it is the absence of knowing
          >clearly everyone else is moronic

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Time don't exists, all was created in one single moment.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Yeah, all observations point to geocentrism and they have to use a lot of complicated mathematics and adhoc reasons to dismiss those observations.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      This make dark energy sound like cope

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        It's a placeholder.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Always was

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Dark energy, from what I remember (it's a complicated topic) is nothing more than our placeholder for anything that counteracts the gravitational pull of visible and dark matter. It's just another theory like so many and should not be taken as any more than that.
      Click bait article, if you ask me.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        it's complicated because it's a cope due to light speed

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      These morons out here arguing things that were already industrialized in the 1960s lol

      Never change please

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Or dark matter and dark energy don't exist and none of these nerds actually know what's going on.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >The observation suggest that something fundamental might be missing or misunderstood in our current model of the universe.
      god these popsci articles are dumb. yes. obviously. this is why we have several concurrent theoretical models because there’s always something that can’t be explained by one theory alone. until we develop a unified model, and honestly even after that we’ll still be working on a theory, there will be questions when it comes to the building blocks of our universe. that’s science. you develop questions and you test them which leads to more questions, and so on.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Dark energy was always considered a bit of a fudge factor, or at least a placeholder, so not a huge surprise tbh

  2. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    they found out God is a black woman, that's why everything sucks

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Blacks are entities that never managed to find God to evolve.

  3. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    What they got wrong is thinking everything can be boiled down to simple math with constants for everything.

  4. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Did you know planets don't hit each other, when they spin around the galaxy? They stay in same ratio regardless how close to the middle or far from it are. Is not the inner circle spinning faster then the inside one, but all move as one.

    Staff that brakes Newton's laws of motion, when going on big scale like galaxy. Then some idiot called there is dark energy to "explain this", because they didn't want to throw away Newton's laws of motion. The lunatics think there way of thinking apply to all life.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      ok genius whats the correct explanation then?

  5. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    academics and normies are being slapped in the face with what theoriticians knew all along:
    we ain't know shit

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >the discrepancy between the measurements of the universe's expansion rate obtained through different methods

      astrophysicists don't know shit and they do metaphysics as if their scientific authority gives them the right to be Empedocles. Empedocles learned from the gods that the kosmos is a Vortex, frick the big bang. arrogant nutjobs

      astrophysicists don't know shit and they do metaphysics as if their scientific authority gives them the right to be Empedocles. Empedocles learned from the gods that the kosmos is a Vortex, frick the big bang. arrogant nutjobs

      The observation suggest that something fundamental might be missing or misunderstood in our current model of the universe.

      Current theories primarily view dark energy as a cosmological constant with uniform properties across space and time. The characteristics of dark energy might not be constant or as previously understood.

      Dark energy, which is thought to drive the accelerated expansion of the universe, possibly has properties that can evolve over time or vary across space, challenging the idea of it being a uniform force with constant density and effect throughout the cosmos.

      If dark energy interacts with matter or varies in any way, it could lead to new understandings of cosmic expansion and help resolve the Hubble tension --the discrepancy between the measurements of the universe's expansion rate obtained through different methods.

  6. 1 month ago
    sage

    astrophysicists don't know shit and they do metaphysics as if their scientific authority gives them the right to be Empedocles. Empedocles learned from the gods that the kosmos is a Vortex, frick the big bang. arrogant nutjobs

  7. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    https://decodingsymbols.wordpress.com/2021/08/14/asteroids-and-comets/
    https://decodingsymbols.wordpress.com/2023/12/08/solar-storms-cosmic-rays-comets-moon-bases/
    https://decodingsymbols.wordpress.com/2022/02/26/particle-physics-also-ukraine-invasion/
    https://sleepydude.substack.com/p/quick-comms-sun
    https://decodingsymbols.wordpress.com/2023/10/13/nuclear-transparency/
    https://sleepydude.substack.com/p/dog-comms-examples
    https://decodingsymbols.wordpress.com/2021/07/08/chernobyl-plutonium-pluto/#Plutonium
    https://narrativecode.substack.com/p/narrative-code
    https://sleepydude.substack.com/p/the-comms-pitch
    https://decodingsymbols.wordpress.com/2023/09/12/full-intro/

  8. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    It implies that much of our understanding of the universe is deeply flawed and incorrect. The universe is expanding, but only when looking at certain locations. The Big Bang is fiction; if you actually believe this to be the origin of the universe, I admire your faith, but I would strongly suggest this is simply a model and not an accurate understanding of reality as it actually is.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      that picture is hilarious

  9. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Nskxbehcidnsjxodvr Is going to be legit, isn’t he?
    I’ve known it since I read his post that he was real in my gut but it’s crazy watching all of this unfold like he said it would in real time.

  10. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    It just means we're still learning. This is good. Absolute knowledge would be our undoing.

  11. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    We live in simulation. Simple as.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      WE LIVE IN A HOLOGRAM, WITH THE ABILITY TO PROJECT IMAGES WITH MASS! THE ATOMS ARE INTELLIGENT AND WOE IS ME!, FOR THE ATOMS HAVE FORSAKEN US!

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Adam and the Atom are the same, Adam Kademon. By As Above So Below the Atom has intentionality. I collapse them both in holy spirit and call them "Atum." This is also the name of the Egyptian god of the evening Sun. Atum was replaced by Ra in the pantheon. Now Ra is the Soul-Person, which the ka, such as daimon or angels or demons, orbit. The ka is the personification of Qi energy or Vril. It is the Will (Vril) spinning Atum (Ra) on the Day of Judgement. This is by the same semantic construction of the holy spirit which derives meaning from similarities between words, or divine etymology. I call this homony. Adam/Atom are in Homony by As Above So Below, what is Adam Kademon. The Ra, the Atom, is Representation and the ka, the electron, is Will. Thus the KOS-MOS is just world as will and representation, or God and his angels.

        i learned all of this from my daimon called Jassamine

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          Why is it that burgers always do moronic wordplay that only works in english and pretend it's "deep"? Do they sincerely don't know other languages? KeK
          Same vibes as the sun = son shit from the zeitgeist movie.

  12. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    The moons official distance from the earth is approx 384,400km yet how would I know this to be true as I've never calculated the distance myself. So much of accepted facts in science as just take on faith. So why care about such things? Science like this is irrelevant in the life of the everyday man, it is just gobbledyasiatic. But from reading that it seems to me they are positing what I knew already, and that is the earth is the centre of the universe.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >the earth is the centre of the universe
      everywhere is the centre of the universe because the big bang happened everywhere

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        we can only make statements like this if we assume the present model is a) without error, b) all inclusive. do you earnestly believe the present model of cosmology is inclusive of all variables that effect the cosmos with out error? if yes, your a lunatic, if no, dont make statements like this.

  13. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >discovery
    They are seeing dots and colors. That's it.
    What modern cosmology is doing right now is assuming the rules out there as far as they can see are all the same as the rules discovered on and near Earth. That's how they claim they "know" what's out there and the beginning and ending of the universe..etc. The catch is of course, we don't actually know what kind of rules are operating out there.
    Without actually travelling to those dots and colors and conducting experiments within their vincinity you actually have no idea what they really are. For all you know the solar system are the only sun and planet in existence and stars..etc. are something completely different from what people think they are.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Interesting

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      it's so fricked up how your post is just basic shit but most don't ever consider it and think it's mind-blowing

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Pretty sure half of EerieWeb disavows cosmology as a legitmate science. Plenty of maxed out threads in the past discussing this.
        Problem is the swarm of your typical midwit redditors and normies that have zero understanding of the scientific method grew up on Star Trek and Star Wars and a million other sci-fi shows swears by modern cosmology and will start collectively reee'ing anti-science everytime it's questioned.
        Adding to the dumpster fire is the fact that everytime cosmology comes under scrutiny Christgays start crawling out of the woodwork in mass like vultures. As if EerieWeb cleaning house automatically validates their Bible.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      When I read how to measured expansion it was the most moronic thing I heard today. It's based on the behaviour of objects they literally don't have any understanding of.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        You don't know half of it.
        Cosmogays legitimately tried to argue on multiple occassions experiment is not needed for science and observation alone is enough to falsify theories.
        By that logic I guess everybody can sell every piece of lab equipments and only keep microscope and telescopes around.
        Absolute bonkers.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      your post is just sophistry. Theres no reason to assume the laws of physics apply here but not there.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        All laws are one experiment away from the trash can; that is why we do them.
        Science is about falsfying assumptions; not circlejerking to them.
        Cosmology is not science, period.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >t. Black person that never heard of uncle Karl

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >Theres no reason to assume the laws of physics apply here but not there.
        How so? All "laws" are assumptions formulated by experimenting, with apparent predictive power. Can you prove by experiment that shits the same here as there? No, you can't, because we haven't been there to verify. Universality of the constants is an axiomatic assumption itself.

  14. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Aiming a telescope to space does not account for energy throughout the cosmos, all frequencies, or any of the higher dimensions.

  15. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Honestly just to remind you that 99.999% of people literally have no idea about how the universe actually functions and are lying as they claim to be a leader

  16. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Here's a great little presentation for the thread. Keep the idea that we are no better than the Greeks were in mind while watching it.

  17. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Nothing really if you understand that the mainstream theories on the nature and birth of the universe are mental gymnastics supported by very weak indirect observations.

  18. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.3847/1538-4357/ad1bc6
    recent paper that tries to explain redshift etc without dark matter/energy blabla, something to keep an eye on, going against the last 70? years of clovis first tier cosmology

  19. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    FTL drive wen

  20. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    so does this mean that god is real or

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      No, it just means the universe isn't likely homogeneous. Some areas may be governed by different principles where the primary forces of the universe may be stronger or weaker. That is to suggest, the strong nuclear force, gravity, and electromagnetism may act differently in different parts of the universe. The Copernicus principle is the assumption that the forces of the universe are constant everywhere. This in itself is a geocentric principle, because it assumes that because something is true on earth and in our local space, that it should remain true several galaxies over. People are shitting on cosmology because they've been operating on an unfounded assumption for a long time. It's worth shitting on because cosmologists don't believe this principle needs to be experimentally tested, which is a fundamental component of the scientific process. Its additionally shitty, because cosmologists have an extremely elaborate, unlikely, and unverified explanation (dark energy) to continue to justify their assumption of universal homogeneity.

  21. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    some scienceBlack person got his math wrong 200 years ago but he was too well respected for anyone to correct him so now we all invent theoretical numbers so his math makes sense instead of re-evaluating the foundation of our understanding and fixing the issue.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      THIS!!! Is all about this. Scientists who can't do this are repeating slaves. Speaking what is know, even, if is wrong, and don't dare to challenge the norm.
      Even evolution is not how people think, humans where created by advanced aliens who visited earth. You can find mythology about this in many ancient sites, being from the sky visited, etc.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        no, this is what we were just talking about. Cosmology's failures to meaningfully re-arrange their models in the face of better evidence doe NOT justify massive leaps of logic about the strength of conclusions made in other fields, especially in regards to such well supported fields as evolutionary biology.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      see

      https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.3847/1538-4357/ad1bc6
      recent paper that tries to explain redshift etc without dark matter/energy blabla, something to keep an eye on, going against the last 70? years of clovis first tier cosmology

  22. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    If you go to the rock formation near your house you'll find a place where 3 points come together, if you roll into it you'll noclip.

  23. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    ?si=zqQF8Wtg9KxCBjCM

  24. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    They've discovered that the only place in the known universe that uses money is Earth.

  25. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    They needed a deep space probe to see what a shit hole this is
    Whereas I've known for years

  26. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    It's so funny to see how many jump on this as some sort of gotcha without ever even bothering to read what is being said
    >hey we have two ways of measuring expansion
    >uh oh, they arent matching up
    >hmm, we checked one of the ways, and we're pretty sure it doesnt work
    Literally all this is.

  27. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Everybody who doesn't have a double digit IQ already knew this. People act like we already know everything when we haven't even so much as left out solar system. It's idiotic. Pay attention the government finally admitted years ago UFOs exist and people still aren't talking about it en masse not for longer than a few days.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Who cares about the government. There were published military reports from several countries and plenty of published books explaining how UFOs exist and the public at large never cared
      Fricking burgers think they're the center of the universe

  28. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >Do calculations based on the relationship between Terra and Sol.
    >Expect every other system to behave the same
    hmm sciency

  29. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    we are part of a growing cosmic being. we're probably not even the nucleus though. if it is anything similar to life on earth beyond earth itself. it's frustrating to me that people don't consider the sun and the earth itself as living entities despite being older than the human race in general. just balls of rock and plasma. there's studies coming out that plasma may be more alive than we have thought. about time. humans think they're almighty god but have zero control. can't even keep a functioning planet alive without destroying whole ecosystems. the only reason the sun doesn't scorch us to death is probably due to loving the planet more than it hates us. we don't deserve the knowledge we have.

  30. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    The truth is they don't have the full picture. Never did and never will. All that matters is the public is given a sufficiently complex yet coherent model that they can hold onto so they have some kind of anchor to base their lives around. Religion serves the same function. Accuracy doesn't matter so much as social control. This is the most important thing.

  31. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    How has nobody mentioned Electric Universe Theory?
    https://www.youtube.com/@ThunderboltsProject/videos

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *