>The Stargate Project was terminated in 1995

>The Stargate Project was terminated in 1995
what happened in 1995?

Black Rifle Cuck Company, Conservative Humor Shirt $21.68

UFOs Are A Psyop Shirt $21.68

Black Rifle Cuck Company, Conservative Humor Shirt $21.68

  1. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >The foregoing observations provide a compelling argument against continuation of the program within the intelligence community. Even though a statistically significant effect has been observed in the laboratory, it remains unclear whether the existence of a paranormal phenomenon, remote viewing, has been demonstrated. The laboratory studies do not provide evidence regarding the origins or nature of the phenomenon, assuming it exists, nor do they address an important methodological issue of inter-judge reliability.

    >Further, even if it could be demonstrated unequivocally that a paranormal phenomenon occurs under the conditions present in the laboratory paradigm, these conditions have limited applicability and utility for intelligence gathering operations. For example, the nature of the remote viewing targets are vastly dissimilar, as are the specific tasks required of the remote viewers. Most importantly, the information provided by remote viewing is vague and ambiguous, making it difficult, if not impossible, for the technique to yield information of sufficient quality and accuracy of information for actionable intelligence. Thus, we conclude that continued use of remote viewing in intelligence gathering operations is not warranted.

  2. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >Hyman came to the conclusion:

    >Psychologists, such as myself, who study subjective validation find nothing striking or surprising in the reported matching of reports against targets in the Stargate data. The overwhelming amount of data generated by the viewers is vague, general, and way off target. The few apparent hits are just what we would expect if nothing other than reasonable guessing and subjective validation are operating

    .

    >Joe Nickell has written:

    >Other evaluators – two psychologists from AIR – assessed the potential intelligence-gathering usefulness of remote viewing. They concluded that the alleged psychic technique was of dubious value and lacked the concreteness and reliability necessary for it to be used as a basis for making decisions or taking action. The final report found "reason to suspect" that in "some well publicised cases of dramatic hits" the remote viewers might have had "substantially more background information" than might otherwise be apparent.

  3. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    a new project probably started that was more compartmentalized

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      like what?
      also, maybe slightly relevant, the project was a handmedown from a different organization

  4. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    The scientists started working for Northrop Grumman.

  5. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    anyone have some more info on this?
    maybe some (advanced?) remote viewer?
    or an insider maybe?
    why did they suddenly drop this
    especially after spending so much time and money on it

  6. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    In 1995 Clinton had the program declassified and then congress caught wind of the fact that the CIA was spending millions of dollars evaluating "psychic woo woo mumbo jumbo" and that caused congress members to start kvetching, so they ordered an external (rigged) audit of the validity of the program with the intent of getting it shut down permanently. They ended up concluding that the program had "no military or intelligence value" and "didn't produce actionable intelligence" because they didn't view the evidence from numerous successful missions and intelligence operations that SRI, the DIA, and CIA produced as valid forms of evidence or convincing enough for congress to continue approving funding.

    I forget the name of the specific congressman but he mainly lead the charge with trying to get the program shut down and I think that was largely due to his religious background thinking that psychic phenomena was evil/devil work, but that's just my opinion. I'm anti-CIA, but pro-parapsychology/psychic research, so having a sort of public execution and gutting of the program sort of bums me out because I think it did hurt the parapsychological community a lot and sour a lot of peoples opinions on "anomalous cognition" and research into it.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      nah
      i dont think anyone would have benefited from a focus on developing these things
      just look at the general state of this place for ex.
      absolutely miserable

      I'm personally happy that independent journalists went through the effort of doing the FOIA requests and getting access to a lot of the declassified documents because I think this has caused a sort of renewed interest in the subject and despite its association with the CIA has Brought some validity to the space. I hope people keep working on this and exploring other parapsychological phenomena in the future.

      i just enjoy reading how completely inept these people are

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      think the guy was a plant to overthrow the program, while simultaneously undermining any other claims of such phenomena?

  7. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    I'm personally happy that independent journalists went through the effort of doing the FOIA requests and getting access to a lot of the declassified documents because I think this has caused a sort of renewed interest in the subject and despite its association with the CIA has Brought some validity to the space. I hope people keep working on this and exploring other parapsychological phenomena in the future.

  8. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Windows 95 with its integrated networking cemented in place the Endless September. Now we are considering implantable devices. Why remote view when you can get it online?
    Also, I'm sure they're still augmenting network data with remote viewing, or vice versa.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      its funny because all the tech in the world doesn't even remotely level the playing field

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *