The purpose of life is truth. To know the truth, to speak the truth, to believe in the truth.

The purpose of life is truth. To know the truth, to speak the truth, to believe in the truth. That is the purpose of life, and nothing else.

Homeless People Are Sexy Shirt $21.68

The Kind of Tired That Sleep Won’t Fix Shirt $21.68

Homeless People Are Sexy Shirt $21.68

  1. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Don't forget to have humility! You will not always know the truth, even if you think you do.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Christianity, is you produce falsehood by lying in venial sins then after death you go to purgatory a little fire then you go to heaven. No. Lying can not lead to heaven whatever purgatory you go through.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      What is you advice in a scenario where you yourself believe that you've come to know the truth of something, and you are speaking with someone else who sees a different truth, but neither of you have absolute confirmation?

      Other than hearing their perspective, but also defending your belief?

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >Other than hearing their perspective, but also defending your belief?
        That's, like, every good conversation ever, though.

  2. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    The purpose is to go to heaven when you die

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      So how do you know this heaven is real? How do you know anything else beside this promise of heaven is real, maybe he lied or deceived about stuff because he believes that will get him to heaven? Could be, if his ultimate goal is not truth but heaven, couldn't it?

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Well I've seen a demon with my own eyes.

  3. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Truth is relative to experience, which means there is no ultimate truth and the purpose is to experience.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >Truth is relative to experience
      you can't prove that so the rest of what you said is irrelevant

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        You just proved it for me, next.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          the only proof that's been shown is your ignorance

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Enlighten me, you've wasted two posts and i still haven't heard about your point. If it's the same as OPs then prove truth isn't relative.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Read this. (not that guy). I'm op.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            I don't care who you are, i'm waiting.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            no evidence can be offered for what a thing is not.
            >If it's the same as OPs then prove truth isn't relative.
            >prove truth isn't

            ps - all known held axioms are functionally false, only a source-error is able to construct a geometer of true axiom sans simulation.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            And who's talking about truth "not being" something? All those semantic gymnastics and you don't seem to know what relative means.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >know what relative means.
            >ll those semantic gymnastics
            relativity has no place in the context of true.
            ps - functional false axiom is a higher fidelity description of what you failed to encapsulate with 'relative truth' noob

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >relativity has no place in the context of true
            The concept of truth is purely idealistic, you're playing with "virtual particles" here. There is not a single truth that is completely a truth and the same goes for falsity.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >There is not a single truth that is completely a truth and the same goes for falsity.

            Only women can birth children.
            Gravity
            1 + 1 = 2

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >Only women can birth children.
            Not always the case.
            >Gravity
            That's not a statement and you don't even know what gravity is.
            > 1 + 1 = 2
            Not always the case.

  4. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >Look for the fire in platelet cave guys
    Every single time.

  5. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Every truth is based on faith. Faith in your senses, faith in your cognition and faith in your heart. Without faith in something, you cant learn anything but good luck figuring out any truth when all you are doing is trusting something

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      I know the truth with my inner mind, some call it the heart, the lower mind. It is certain that some things are known, while other things are only believed. There is no doubt in my mind on certain ideas I have personally gained insight of. It transcends belief and exists in the regions of knowledge.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        What you have is great trust, the only thing you seem to talk about is how trusting you are

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          I just explained. It's not trust, but knowledge, trusting is done or faith is done with the higher mind, in abrahamic faiths just called the mind. Knowledge and insight or gnosis come from the lower mind, the heart, and is not changeable, or refutable by newer knowledge added on to it. It is something faith has no power over. For example, you know you exist, one of the most basic types of gnosis. Do you believe you exist? Are you saying you "trust" in that? Or do you intuitively know it.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Yes, i believe i exist but i also recognize that im trusting my cognition to comprehend logic well enough to come to that conclusion. My definitions could be wrong as well, my meaning of "I" could be wrong and my meaning of "exist" could also be wrong.
            What im saying may sound silly but there is strong evidence that the universe functions in a way that goes against any human logic. Like a thing being in multiple places at the same time almost as though its existing as nothing more than a possibility. Whose to say the rabbit hole doesnt go much deeper and appears unfathomably more incomprehensible at its depths?

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Hmm. Well yes. The lower mind functions beyond logic and reason. That's how deep the rabbit hole goes. There is nothing further beyond that. God is beyond that. How could the creator of logic he subject to logic.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            A frog wouldnt know that it exists, its lower mind is bound by its brain being too smooth and small. How can you say that your lower mind isnt bound the same way?

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            I say that because I have experienced it. Just like experiencing a chair as wood, you will not doubt that it is wood once you have seen the wood.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Its not like the frog hasnt experienced existence yet you came to the conclusion and it didnt, why?

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            I don't know if the frog has a lower mind. Who says it doesn't know it exists? The frog could possibly know god exists and whatever else.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            I know I exist, because I have gotten the insight into this fact. I don't know why we are still debating whether I do or don't have the insight. If you don't trust my word, then why am I going to use different words, to convey the idea further? If you don't trust me, then I waste my time by talking to you.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Its almost a little funny how much importance you place in trust. Of course i dont trust you. If trust determines whether you are wasting time with something or not, the value you place in your insight means its quite trustworthy. I dont think that you will ever admit that its trust though

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            You don't trust me? Then I also don't trust you, since you are not a follower of truth. Like seeks like, I don't see any truth in someone who doesn't believe in truth. Your words have no weight but my words have ultimate weight since I believe or know that truth is real. Knowledge of truth is the first step towards any knowledge, and you do not have it.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            What is truth without proof?

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Truth itself is the proof. Gnosis is not bound to proofs, but to inner knowledge, and the first step to gaining any inner knowledge is trusting someone if they follow truth and one has gained insight that they are right. Or as /misc/ would put it, "if it sounds based".

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >Truth itself is the proof
            This is bullshit and your understanding is flawed. You think you are enlightened but you are still in the dark.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Then explain 'how' it is bullshit without insult and lower speech obscuring the thoughts you want to convey.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            You are right about me, i do not have any knowledge of the truth nor am i follower of it. But going back to you, someone who follows truth shouldnt care much about trust, trust is irrelevant to the truth. Do you think im wrong because you dont trust me? If you trusted me, would you think im telling the truth? Is that all your truth amounts to?

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Trust. I trust, when I see someone does indeed not lie and not deceive, and sometimes after I have thought about it. I think you're wrong indeed but not because I don't trust you, rather I don't trust you because you are wrong. Other way round. If I trusted you, it would mean you are truthful, and then I would if you are wise believe you, if still not that wise, take your words to heart and after fitting contemplation of the words you said, believe, or know, they are true. That you are truthful. My truth. My truth amounts to reality. It amounts to ultimate facts and realities. Whether you are truthful or not has only to do with you personally, and the words you speak. It is none of my business or issue if you aren't truthful, but it would obviously be better and good if you were indeed truthful to the full extent that is possible. The perfect world is without falsehood, but we need as people to care about ourselves first and probably only ourselves ultimately. That is a thing I have yet to acquire. Absolute ambivalence.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Well i cant poke at you anymore, you are good at weaseling out of things. I wish you luck because i dont think you have a bad goal, just an impossible goal

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Haha ok thanks. Well the impossible has a sort of uniqueness to it. Buddha said the goal of existence is to see reality as it is. I suppose that's my goal, just with truth as the actual name for that goal. Good luck to you too, I hope you travel the path sooner or later if you like it.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            how much of the 'truth' of wood do you know though? do you know what it is, how its formed, why it works and where its components come from? id imagine you dont, its much more likely you have a totemic definition of wood that is essentialy a catalogue of everything you were innitially informed was wood compared with every woodlikething you experienced after the formation of your totemic catalogue of whatiswood. but this is not the truth of the chair or the truth of the wood. its a label applied deferentially sans natural comprehension.
            moreover your doing the whole symantic vs natural truth thing, ie there are no married bachelors, you say you know the chair is wood, but at some point your understanding of what is wood fails, this is the functional limits of your woodly axioms (im hard)

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            You are talking about the higher mind here. In the higher mind, I have a totemic definition of wood, but my lower mind does not think of what is wood how is wood produced and all that. It knows wood is a material production and transitory, that is the basic idea of wood and the lower mind only regards basic ideas I think. For example knowing what wood is can be forgotten. But the knowledge that wood is matter and that is what it is fundamentally, is eternal.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            i think the totem we describe has said lower mind at its base what you describe as the thinking higher mind as its a mid section the base seemlessly transitions too, and at its top (pyramid is a better model butt frick the fraternities) - awareness, mind without the latency of confusion.
            >But the knowledge that wood is matter and that is what it is fundamentally, is eternal.
            id say this is the highest mind not the lowest mind. you have differentiated wood within your phylum of experience sufficiently to have no confusion (mind/thinking) in regards to wood. your woodly axiom functions, even if its false.
            inb4 as above so below with dat totemic mentality.

  6. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    The purpose of life is to blow big loads in tight pussies.

  7. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    nothing is true.

  8. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Life doesn't matter anymore and it has become very obvious everywhere you go.
    You can feel it when you are out in public, no one gives a frick about anything anymore. Even normies are blackpilled husks now.
    I go to work and basically just do nothing. I don't give a shit if they fire me, it literally doesn't matter at this point. I'm poor if I'm NEETing and poor if I work full time. This society is pointless.
    No community, no property, no families, no future.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *