The church remains in power to this day with major influence in the world of spirituality worshiping a creepy sexist murderous deity.

The church remains in power to this day with major influence in the world of spirituality worshiping a creepy sexist murderous deity. How did it come to this? What exactly is this freak? A dragon? An alien entity perhaps the leader of the watchers? Is it some kind of cosmic horror? The elite worship lucifer so is this being just that?

It's All Fucked Shirt $22.14

DMT Has Friends For Me Shirt $21.68

It's All Fucked Shirt $22.14

  1. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Baal worship, happens every time a prophet comes and goes

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Anon can you elaborate?

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Basically people who don't know wtf the schizo prophets are talking about take over the movement every time the prophets dies. They always without fail mistake God with their limited idea of god. The funny thing is per Elijah; God is the Lord, if yahweh is Lord he is God, and if Baal is lord, he is God.
        They both are God (infinite unknowable)

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          To elaborate further, satan, the dragon, demiurge, etc all those are essentially metaphors for the idea of God. A lesser and made up version, One that is far inferior to the infinite unknowable God. Normies have to imagine they can comprehend God because they have all that pride ego psyche nonsense, which is why we have God and why we have the idea of God.
          Essentially, all Gods(creator/originator) are different perspectives on an infinite and unknowable concept. If god is less than infinite and all encompassing, it is not God it is our idea of god.

  2. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >this one may not appreciate the answers they seek

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      What do you even mean anon? Please elaborate.

  3. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    its a human-created egregore

    we called it here

  4. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Calls God “Yahweh”

    homosexual detected. I think your te does are done in the microwave.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      That's his name according israelites and christians. Do some fricking research.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        No it isn’t but I won’t educate you because it does me a service to recognize you morons who curse what you do not understand.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Oh your moronic then. Stay out of the thread dumbfrick if you can't say anything useful.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Oh he’s big mad I won’t spoon feed him secret knowledge and profound wisdom he wouldn’t appreciate anyways.
            Rid the earth of your filth for us all, wouldn’t you?

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Oh man you missed out on the only worthwhile thread that ever came out of this shithole, didn’t you? That’s a shame. I don’t know it well enough to explain it as simply and profound as the anon in that thread did, but Yahweh is definitely not the name of God.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          It's Yahu, since that's what all the earliest records say.
          >Two Egyptian inscriptions make mention of the “Shasu of Yahu (or yhw)” – apparently their place of dwelling.The Shasu were semi-nomadic tribes mostly in the Southern Levant and are frequently attested to in Egyptian texts. Many scholars believe that this dwelling place of theirs is a toponym for a deity they worshipped named Yahu(w), or YHWH.
          >Amherst Papyrus 63
          It also explains how the name Elijah is really Eliyahu, which is the full name of God. Even the Septuagint said His name was Ιαω, which sounds like Yahu. The Masoretic text seemed to have put in random diacritical marks for the Name.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >'e lie?
            >ya?
            >hu?

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Kek

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >kew

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            That’s closer than Yahweh, but you’re still missing the mark.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Elaborate. Yahwa as seen in Assyrian texts? Yave as recorded of the Samaritans? What?

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            It can’t be written. It is subject to misinterpretation because people keep trying to insert vowels, even though Moses wrote it is to be pronounced exactly as it is written, nothing added or subtracted.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            That's nice and all, but people knew the name and used it in theophorics and hymns. It makes no sense to say that they lost the pronunciation before it became a taboo because it would have been a living tradition.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Ever play telephone?

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Not how oral tradition works.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >now how oral tradition works

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            We are in a time of written record keeping. Very few oral traditions have not been recorded at this point.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            It’s exactly how it works
            I’m sharing the knowledge with you just to arm you with more curses agains the Breath of Life.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Elohim u tard

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          That's what the Kingdom of Samaria typically used, we find it used especially in the Korahite psalms which would've probably been written in the Northern cultic areas like Dan. The Tetragrammaton was used more in the South.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          elohim is not a name, God called himself I AM

  5. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    an appeal to authority

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      What changed though? Previous gods were open-minded so why did this one catch on?

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        simplicity. rather than various sects each worshipping their own gods, boiling things down to one creator and worshipping an idol of his avatar served to keep the population in check with greater ease.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Xtianity was a new countercultural religion that accepted anyone as equals, and some people could rise into positions within these churches, when upward mobility was severely restricted elsewhere. There were many christian "denominations", not just the proto-orthodox. The Romans had some trouble with the Bacchan coup, so they were very leery of cults that looked like governments, and Xtianity did. Then Emperor Constantine decided he would commandeer Xtianity, and declared thatit would be legal for his own purposes, so he convened the Nicaean Church Council with the proto-orthodox leaders, and they decided they would rather be Right than be Free, and Constantine pushed them very hard into creating a single Universal Christian Orthodoxy. It took awhile for it to become the only permitted religion is the RE, but it did through coersion. Justinian and Theodosius decreed that everyone MUST be an Orthodox Xtian, or else! They closed the Philosophical Academies, and [now] "Pagan" temples and shrines, and persecuted their heretics. The Church was married to the government, and this arrangement continued to be beneficial to the rich and powerful whom Jesus railed against, not the hoi polloi, for 1600 years, including the Protestant sects, who were usually propped up by "national" governments. The Byzantine Empire then froze solid all upward mobility and changes in social position. Then the barbarian kings were told that they would get favorable trade deals and Legitimacy if they forced Orthodox Xtianity on their subjects, though some were Arians already. Their government monopoly on religious thought and practice was finally curbed, but they desperately want it back! Thus, the "Christian Nationalists", who are now about 20% of Americans across-the-board, is ready for their turn at religious tyranny.

  6. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    That's what you think. God used to be more harsh on humanity in the old testament. When he sent his son, the world was saved. God loosened his grip on humanity.

    Jesus is good
    God is Good
    They're real.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      That legit doesn't justify all his rape and murder orders. The fact that he needed his "son" to die and suffer instead of saying "I forgive you" tells you how much of a narcissist he is.

  7. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Forget about the deity, their messiah diddled kids in public places and was on drugs 24/7, their tulpa is the least of their concerns.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      can you please stop with this shit, what the frick are you talking about? there are legitimate problems in christianity and jesus being a kid fricker is not one of them, in fact the gospel of thomas would indicate more that he was a womanizer, though neither are true
      >Jesus said: Two will rest upon a bed; one will die, the other live. Salome said: Who are you, man, whose son? You have mounted my bed and eaten from my table. Jesus said to her: I am he who comes forth from the one who is equal; I was given of the things of my Father. I am your disciple. Therefore I say: If he is equal, he is full of light, but if he is divided, he will be full of darkness.
      And from the Gospel of Luke
      >She began to wash his feet with her tears, and she dried them with her hair, kissing them many times and rubbing them with the perfume.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >the gospel of thomas would indicate more that he was a womanizer
        Well, if you can call his pre-pubescent prostitutes women.

        >not true
        It's true in the greek source and that's the only thing that matters.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Nta but the gospels are not accurate sources. Mark is the oldest and you can tell it the closest to the truth along with the suspected Q source with the others being edits. No one no knows who Yeshua was whether just a really nice man or a kind mystic.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Agreed, but I think Jesus being a pedophile would have shown up in more polemics against him if it were recorded

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >No one no knows who Yeshua was whether just a really nice man or a kind mystic.
          What about the greek texts which are originals (not translations) according to the only classical philologist who's talking about it. These are translations from the literal source, so if they say one thing, you know that thing, there's no guessing involved.

          Agreed, but I think Jesus being a pedophile would have shown up in more polemics against him if it were recorded

          And those texts clearly say that Jesus trafficked kids and that the apostles were kids themselves.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Those greek texts were written way after apostles' deaths.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Those greek texts are the oldest source material, the fact bibles now tell a completely different and fabricated narrative just tells you someone edited the shit out of it.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Yeah I know this this but oldest doesn't mean they right especially knowing they were written after the apostles death means they are edits of truth themselves.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            > means they are edits of truth themselves
            It doesn't mean that, the current bible is mostly mistranslated (on purpose most likely) while the greek texts aren't mistranslated because the source is greek. I'll trust the phd greek philologist who's translating the ancient texts over people on EerieWeb who haven't even read the faux bible but still swear by it.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            No philosopher agrees that the texts speak the truth unless they are christian shills. The greek version of mathew is still an edit of Mark. Again the apostles were dead before these texts were written.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >No philosopher
            Who cares about philosophers, they can't read ancient greek. The point is that the Bible controls half the world and it's based off the greek texts because there are direct (mis)translations accessible to anyone. At the very least it proves that christianity is a political fabrication through the assembling, mistranslation and proliferation of the canon.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >only classical philologist who's talking about it
            Oh, you mean the gay feminist History Channel moron with a degree from a mediocre state school, who's the only one who talks about it because he makes shit up out of thin air? That idiot?

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            I'm talking about Ammon Hillman, a married man with kids, which is irrelevant anyways since he translated the greek texts and there's no going around that fact.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >the greek texts
            Which ones? Where's the proof this moron published any translation of any Biblical text? His books are pages and pages of lies with no sources given. He just pulls nonsense out of his ass.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            What do you mean a phd philologist isn't sourcing his translations, are you on crack? I think you just haven't read shit.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            I'm asking you for proof this guy has published a translation of anything. He lost his academic job for being a crank. None of his books is out with an academic publisher, and he simply asserts shit without citations in them. He appears on History Channel garbage, like the various moron fake academics on Ancient Aliens.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            He lost his academic job because he was investigated by the catholic church accused of "demonic possession" after some b***h in his campus accused him of flying into her room and knocking out her roommate with magic at a distance. There are even articles about it. He doesn't use academic publishers because they made him scrub his shit and censor his work ,and i don't know anything or give a shit about history channel, but this guy laughs at the annunaki meme and calls it silly whenever any interviewer brings it up when he mentions the book of Enoch. This guy isn't a conspiracy theorist, he just exclusively works with ancient pharmaceutical texts and hellenic shit.

            As for the books i don't have them at hand, pretty sure he had digital free copies of his stuff, and he also has plenty interviews where he addresses the "hot topics" with sourcing.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >He lost his academic job because he was investigated by the catholic church accused of "demonic possession"
            Yeah, that's called a disgraced academic's shitty excuse for being a disgraced academic.
            >give a shit about history channel
            They made a whole documentary about his fake research. So he's at that shit level, the level of an HC crank.
            >He doesn't use academic publishers because they made him scrub his shit and censor his work
            LOL yeah how convenient. The same loser who can't keep an academic job can't publish in academic outlets because "eweyone meen to meee and cenzor meeeee!" Or he could be a moronic crank, which is why he's literally the only fruitcake alive arguing for this shit.
            >Don't have the books to hand
            You don't need to. I've read them. He doesn't cite shit, the real reason he won't publish in academic outlets. He's a fraud.
            >muh interviews
            Yeah, him liberally fabricating shit and pretending ancient Greek debauchery was part of the Christian life and he have to believe that because ... uhhh ... because the Church is misogynistic and we just need to believe this to stick it to them ok!?

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            we have to believe*

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            You only have to pay taxes and die. No, you don't have to beLIEve!

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            How do you fabricate fricking translations of pieces of text accessible to the public, he's translated that shit over and over again with sliders and side by side comparisons with the modern Bible both using the greek source, he goes word by word demonstrating the translations in the Bible are fake.

            This isn't a fraud or a conspiracy narrative he's making up, because he can't, he's purely translating septuagint in front of everyone and the other academic hellenistic authorities don't call him out, ask yourself why.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >How do you fabricate fricking translations of pieces of text accessible to the public
            Then
            >he goes word by word demonstrating the translations in the Bible are fake
            Oh I see, you're a complete fricking moron. His bullshit translations have to be real because "how could you fake what the public can access". But you think that those same publicly accessible texts have been given "fake" translations by the countless (real) experts in Greeks who've produced Bible translations for centuries. Only Hillman, state-school-degree mediocrity and disgraced academic, knows how to read Greek! LOL! But there's no conspiracy: it's just that he has to avoid publishing in serious venues that would expose his lies because of the censors that are out to get him. No conspiratorial thinking there.
            >hellenistic authorities don't call him out
            No one but internet morons pay attention to him because he's such a obvious clown and failed as an academic. There are some reviews of his fraud work online pointing out, correctly, that he just makes shit up and doesn't provide sources.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >I am he who comes forth from the one who is equal
        This is as good a definition of Christ as any: he who comes forth from the whole self.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Jesus literally said if anyone harmed a hair on a child’s head it would be better for him to hang a millstone around his own neck and cast himself into the sea, but sure dude let’s go with your schizo brain instead.

  8. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    You're judging him by the standards he gave you to measure with. Plus you're limited and not omniscient and therefore cannot possibly be good. Get rekt c**t

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Says you. That your belief not an actual fact. He justifies rape and murder of children yet condemns others for his crimes. If you like your evil god go for it.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Your entire perception on every single thing is based on what has been given to you. None of it is your own. You as a limited being can never be good no matter how hard you try. Even if you did manage to get yourself under control, you are not smart enough to know how to perfectly live so that everything you do is to the benefit of others.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          And this is based on your perception not mine. Yahweh by no means is a good being since he rapes and kills others based on logical observation and therefore of all deities is by no means the one to worship as there were nicer gods in other religions.

  9. 3 weeks ago
    Justice

    yahweh's daemon name is Ba'al anon.
    its what they wont tell you also moloch is another.

    he appears as ether father time, a golden owl, a female deity called saturn or red heffer
    these where the symbols of rome.

    the name holy see is a direct translation of the all seeing eye also the same symbol.
    how do you know?
    always the demand for saciface is the first borns
    jesus was one of these first borns.
    he unknownly got sacifaced by the juden to asked the romans to use the cross for this reason

    TL: DR
    killing your self is also a ritual saciface to moloch.

    which is why i'm against human sacfice.
    guess why the end of the world bullshit keeps happening here is picrelated.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      But why all the name change? Why not convince everyone to just worship ba'al directly? And who is the lucifer the elite worship? Also the same deity? Didn't the israelites claim they were all separate?

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Because the person you are replying to is fricking moronic.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >he unknownly got sacifaced
      Reality:
      >And He went a little farther, and fell on His face and prayed, saying, “O My Father, if it be possible, let this cup pass from Me; nevertheless, not as I will, but as Thou wilt.”
      >"Yahweh is a sacrifice hungry monster!"
      Reality:
      >And Samuel said, “Hath the Lord as great delight in burnt offerings and sacrifices as in obeying the voice of the Lord? Behold, to obey is better than sacrifice, and to hearken than the fat of rams.

  10. 3 weeks ago
    Justice

    No.37977196
    but i am samael and i knew i was worshiping moloch keke
    yes those are the other offerings of ba'al theya re literally the same being anon.
    that's why you saciface your forskin to him as well becuase other deities use it to grant protection with spells and so on.

    its why my powers don't work with blood magic
    yah was once a blood mage and that is blood magic granded its just a protection spell from lust.
    but it also makes your dick senitive.
    they used to do it on woman as well
    for the same reason to make their pussy not so senitive. hence why they always had perfect pussies

    but that was the magic of ba'al or kemsypt as he was known to the Egyptians.

    again its a language thing, that and the hewbews had no schools and where mostly ilterate.
    according to my scouts from luxor to kempt.
    its 380km to my terrortry so about 8~10 days walk.

    no that town was cutt off from the outside world
    the valley of the kings is very hard to navagate.
    so they ended up having their own language being cutt off from everyone else.

    some times my scouts would spy on them or give them news of the outside world but for the most part we left them alone.
    they where right on the boarder with numbibia and we couldn't aford to send monks to teach them about the gods with out provoking their neibours.
    so the hewbews reminded uneducated.

    its just politics anon.

  11. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >muh sexism
    Invalid
    Look at the stage of world right now in the west. Shitty? You can thanks “equality of sexes” for that

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *