Tell Me About Carbon 7

Like, right now. This is important.

POSIWID: The Purpose Of A System Is What It Does Shirt $21.68

DMT Has Friends For Me Shirt $21.68

POSIWID: The Purpose Of A System Is What It Does Shirt $21.68

  1. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Looks like some nice monitors. EerieWeb or EerieWeb could probably tell you more.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      sounds expensive

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        1000 bucks over 10 years equipment isn't expensive
        sure it's not 100 buck chinaware (not hatin some make good competetive priced shit) that you have to replace after 3 years but hey.

  2. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >6th element
    >black
    >makes hexagons
    >what stuff turns into when burned
    he can’t keep getting away with it

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      You forgot
      >extremely similar to "goat" in romance languages

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      hol' up. What are the odds that Saturn's hexagon is caused, in part, due to carbon in the atmosphere?

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Can you explain what the cube is. I used to live in a dorm that was really cheap due to it being in the shittiest part of town, and there would always be drawings of cubes on walls and on the ground, presumably drawn by homeless people since I was right next to the peak homeless territory. What do they know that I don't? Most of them were natives

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        The cube is what this simulation is housed in.
        It’s alluded to and referenced by hexagons and black cubes. Also “666”s and some other things.
        It’s likely that triangle symbolism derives from it too.

        The “all-seeing eye” idea is really the simulation ai that keeps the “subatomic particles” (“ones and zeroes”, small bits that are “positive” and “negative”) together— helps them keep their forms.
        Quantum mechanics ideas, however literally truthful, either describe or (per “however literally truthful”) reference this with “observer effect”, things you’ve probably heard about obscurantism creating reality, etc.
        The “all-seeing eye”/form-keeping ai has been called the “demiurge ai” by some.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Christ is King

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Now since the simulation bots can’t discredit what I’ve posted since they were thoroughly refuted, they now try to promote their simulation-approved religious lies

            The actual Jesus, assuming he existed, was another actual consciousnesses that was aware of what all actual consciousnesses are really capable of and tried to make those that are real in the fake-reality more aware

            The fake Jesus you’re alluding to is a religious trap proliferated so that way when the believer’s body stops functioning, and the consciousness is just interfacing with the simulation-nonphysical body and not that and the simulation-physical body, a simulation bot disguised as Jesus can convince it to come into the “white light”— a trap which reincarnates the consciousness, and the consciousness doesn’t know that’s what it really does

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            So much text, bla bla bla. Your message has no soul

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            My message doesn’t have a subliminal “cognitive hazard”, which affects the mental space and can even manipulate the heart “chakra” to make it feel loving and true, which may very well lead to someone reincarnating against their will.
            That’s what it really is.
            And you typing “so much text, bla bla bla” possibly implies you didn’t read all of it— so if you didn’t read all of it, presumably just “skimming” it, how do you know whether or not it has soul?

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            (“cognito hazard” is what I meant to type)

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >which may very well lead to someone reincarnating against their will
            Holy shit enough with these satanic lies

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            You try to indirectly discredit what I said by claiming it’s satanic— but you do not explain HOW it is “satanic” aside from implying that because it goes against what you said, it is therefore “satanic”

            And isn’t “holy shit” blasphemous to you?

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >isn’t Z blasphemous to you?
            >it's to you, not me
            Aah, the bots make the error to quickly reveal their allegiance

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            How is what I typed inaccurate grammatically?
            And even if there is 1 grammatical error, how does that mean I’m a bot and that the sentiment of my post is NOT true?

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            How is what I typed inaccurate grammatically?
            And even if there is 1 grammatical error, how does that mean I’m a bot and that the sentiment of my post is NOT true?

            Sorry I read too quickly and thought you typed “intelligence” not allegiance.

            You presuppose that what I typed is “satanic” and that it’s not blasphemous to me because I’m “satanic”, even though you didn’t address how— if I’m understanding what you typed accurately— you could’ve typed it in the first place as you imply it would’ve been satanic to you— so if it’s in fact blasphemous why did you type it to begin with?

            You presuppose things which can only be supported by “because a religion or religious book said so”.
            You cannot tell me how anything is true or anything is known— essential to answer, because what makes your religion or ideas true when there are so many out there?
            Instead you keep proliferating lies that will only end with consciousnesses unaware and reincarnating against their will.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Additionally, your post seems to suggest that the amount of text means it doesn’t have soul, but didn’t Jesus say some longer things himself?
            So if length doesn’t determine how much soul it has, then what does? It would be truth.
            So try to disapprove what I said in a way other than “because a religious text said so”. I can explain how anything is known and what makes something true— I wrote it down and can copy and paste it because I didn’t want to type it out again and again

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous
      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >saturn symbol is half of heart cross
        Wtf this has to be cpindencse

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Another good image

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          https://i.imgur.com/X8y1hgx.jpg

          Another good image

          Another, continuing the subject

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          https://i.imgur.com/X8y1hgx.jpg

          Another good image

          https://i.imgur.com/OLIxRaT.jpg

          [...]
          Another, continuing the subject

          3

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          https://i.imgur.com/X8y1hgx.jpg

          Another good image

          https://i.imgur.com/OLIxRaT.jpg

          [...]
          Another, continuing the subject

          https://i.imgur.com/dNWw3ww.jpg

          [...]
          [...]
          3

          4

          These were from a post (or however many) made by an account in the subreddit r/SoulTrapMovies.
          That account now just says “[deleted]” unfortunately.
          I have considered the possibility that it was intentionally deleted and made to look as though the user themself deleted it, because its posts were some of the best I’ve come across in a while (and its odd that it was posting these kinds of things for 3+(?) years and then suddenly stopped.) Genuinely informative.
          I wonder where they are now. I hope they’re alright.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >reddit
            >some of the best posts
            Anon, I ...

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Go frick yourself you generalizing simulation bot c**t

            I will fricking expose you demented, lying frickers every chance I get

            WHY DON’T YOU JUDGE THE POSTS ON THEIR OWN MERITS?!
            ARE THOSE IMAGES STEREOTYPICAL “LE EPIC ‘QUIRKY’” REDDIT SCHLOCK WHICH YOU “ANONS” LIKE TO MAKE FUN OF?!

            NO!!! YOU DECEITFUL c**t!!!

            THERE ARE NICHE SUBREDDITS SEPARATED FROM FRONTPAGE, ANTI-TRUTH REDDIT CULTURE BETTER THAN /X/ MANY DAYS!

            DAMN YOU AND YOUR ATTEMPTS
            DAMN YOUR TINGLY-WINGLY GREENTEXT MAYMAYS TO TRY AND DISSUADE ON-LOOKERS FROM READING WHAT I POSTED AND TO TRY AND INDIRECTLY DISCREDIT WHAT I’VE SAID

            ALL YOU ALL-BARK NO BITE BOTS CAN’T BE DIRECT WHEN SHIT GETS REAL
            BUT I WON’T BE INDIRECT c**t
            DAMN YOU

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Bot post

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Why is what I posted a bot post?

            To imply it’s a bot post is to imply that what I’ve said is untrue— is explaining the nuance of the situation, that not every single thing posted on Reddit is bullshit, somehow a “bot post”?

            Is pointing out the anti-truth attempts you simulation bot c**ts make somehow a “bot action”?

            Go away— you were refuted and now you’re trying the lamest shit possible as a fixing tactic

            If I don’t type all caps with strong emotion you frickers say I’m a bot— if I type all caps and with strong emotion you frickers say I’m a bot

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Still bot post. I can see it mile away

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Explain how it is then— I made posts which include images that explain how common, everyday things are actually references to and rituals celebrating elements of this fake reality.
            I mentioned how and where I got them, Reddit, and you found the perfect opportunity to try and discredit what I said due to the reputation Reddit commonly has on this site.
            Then, being upset about the bullshit you simulation bots always employ, whether on this site or Reddit or EerieWeb, I refute what you said and make it clear what you really are.
            I do this again in response to your previous reply but still you try again.
            Now who’s motives seem more suspect: the individual posting images which show— backed up by solid evidence and sound or mostly sound presuppositions— how demented this fake-reality really is; or the user that uses common quasi-memes to “appeal to conformity” and indirectly discredit the images I posted, that doesn’t explain how the other user is a bot, who also then, in a subsequent reply, says “I can see it from a mile away” to imply that they have better faculties then the individual they’re arguing with, similar to such simulation bots will sometimes use certain reaction images to subliminally influence on-lookers to make them more inclined to agree with them?

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            (“this site or Reddit or EerieWeb or Twitter, etc.” I meant to type)

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            (“whose” not “who’s” I should’ve typed, also “than” instead of “then”)

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Let’s see how you faux-confident you frickers are when your truther darling “Aaron Haywood” is soon exposed— a bot c**t that employs many of the same methods as you lot typically do

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            (“how faux-confident you” I meant to type)

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *