Mandella Effect

What year did the cornucopia disappear? I remember when. But I will hold my card until I see it answered in the thread.

POSIWID: The Purpose Of A System Is What It Does Shirt $21.68

It's All Fucked Shirt $22.14

POSIWID: The Purpose Of A System Is What It Does Shirt $21.68

  1. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    this is the only one that makes me think something happened. I remember during a lesson on Thanksgiving in kindergarten learning about it and thinking 'thats what that thing is. makes sense!'

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      I have a similar memory. Maybe we’re replicants with similar memory implants.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        or maybe we read that story in the same place and our human memories filled in the gaps our kindergarten minds couldn't hold on to.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          t. israelite

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      I have some personal ones that make me think something happened, and the amount people who insist on the cornucopia is interesting, but I never saw the cornucopia as a kid, and I do recall going shopping and seeing the logo with my mom.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >this is the only one that makes me think something happened.
      Same, or at least it's the only one that I'm positive was once the "wrong" version.

  2. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    I think 2006 maybe. Earliest would've been 2001 but definitely not before that.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      ding ding, op here. it was 2001 it was sometime after new years

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        What do I win?

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Has it really been gone that long? I have a similar type of memory as the others mentioned when I was really young, so it could have been any time since then.
        But I feel like if it was 2001 I would have heard about it much sooner.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          >But I feel like if it was 2001 I would have heard about it much sooner.
          I doubt it, because they didn't start denying it until a year or two ago. Without them denying it changing their logo is pretty much a non-event.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            This makes it all the worse. Gaslighting bastards. They know what they did. It's not merely a fluke in reality, but actively malicious.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        no it wasnt you dumbass Black person
        I was born in 2000 and remember the cornucopia at least up until 2012

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          You remember buying it in 2012 or seeing it on other people's clothes in 2012? Because when it was taken out of production would just be the beginning of it fading, it would still take many years to burn through and ruin the stock they had already produced with cornucopia's prior to removing it from their logo.
          Also I'm convinced Fruit of the Loom is straight up just lying about this for some reason, I don't think it's actual Mandella

  3. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    2017 october 7th

  4. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    I last remember seeing it around 2007ish. 2010-11 was when I noticed the cornucopia was gone but thought they just updated their logo.

  5. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >I remember when
    You remember when it disappeared FOR YOU.
    I monitored the mandela effect subr/eddit for a couple years, and I reached the conclusion that things changed for different people at different times.
    The most erratic was the Flinstones->Flintstones effect, where yesterday it was Flinstones, and today it's Flintstones, for someone in the world.
    And I'm talking about yesterday, 2024 June 7, someone wakes up today and it's Flintstones.
    I figure it's the same for all effects, you can point out to a date, but other people had the change before then, and others afterwards.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      That's assuming Mandella effect is timeline based and not a massive psyop.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        It's both young one. It's a symptom created by an effect covered up by a psyop.
        Imagine you've found a way to steer Earth, not an individual, across timelines -- but it's just not perfect. We avoid the death of our prison and end up losing/gaining some people and events.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Why the hell would a cartoon with a town called Bedrock and filled with Stone Age jokes have the main family called Flinstones?

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        It's a surname and it could have been anything.
        Why the hell was Harry Potter called Harry Potter if he didn't smoke pot?

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          The original name for the Flintstones in the pilot was the Flagstones, so it was definitely always intended to be a rock pun(much like 90% of the show). As someone who watched it my entire life I always remember it being the Flintstones.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          >Mentions Harry Potter literally while I'm compiling my post about it
          ...

          https://i.imgur.com/pEUtQMV.jpeg

          NEW MANDELLA!
          MANDELLA IS DEAD! LONG LIVE THE NEW MANDELLA!
          Dan Povenmire (Voice Actor and Animator: Simpsons, Family Guy, SpongeBob, others...)
          Literally reveals who the new Mandella is:

          MARGOLYES
          IS
          THE
          NEW
          MANDELLA!

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          "Potter" as in putting plants in pots?

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >Flinstones
      Never was you well poisoning moron.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        It was a huge thing because people knew it was "Flintstones" (like flint rock you use to start a fire). But then it changed to "Flinstones" and supposedly that was always the correct spelling. Now the original is back.

  6. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    JUST LIKE FROOT LOOPS
    CHICK FILL A GOT IT'S ORIGINAL NAME BACK!

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      What are you talking about? Everyone I see complaining about it swears that the name was originally Chic-Fil-A.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >Everyone I see complaining about it
        On flip flops the threads complaining about the reverse change vanish or get reversed.
        I know because I lived it first hand, with videos disappearing even from my browser History.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          That sounds more like you got MK Ultra'd than it does like you shifted timelines.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            I'm not saying I shifted timelines, I'm explaining how the flip-flops work:
            >Sees thread on r/eddit about how "Houston we have a problem" changed to "Houston we've had a problem"
            >Links to video about it
            >Watches video about how, in the movie, "Houston we have a problem" changed to "Houston we've had a problem"
            >Video plays the scene, he says "Houston we've had a problem"
            >Sees thread on r/eddit about flip flop "Houston we have a problem is BACK!"
            Oh, I just watched a video about that! Let's see if the video changed or flipped or what!
            >Video is gone
            >Thread about it is gone, now it's all about the flip flop
            >My browser History doesn't have any entry at the times I was reading the threads and watching the video (there is now a gap there)
            >Now there's old threads about people talking about the flip flop and about how threads vanished and videos vanished, which has just happened to me!
            Not only it happened to me, it happened to many people before hand, and even years later I read new reports of people that had it happen to them JUST NOW.
            If it didn't, I could think it was just me being wrong or confused, but it's really weird and in past mandela effect threads on EerieWeb, people tell their own stories... that also happened to me.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            hmm interesanting, fricking masons ruining everything, why do they do this? do they think they can escape the apocalypse by changing timelines to make an infinite nothinghappens consumist hellhole earth?

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            They aren't shifting timelines exactly. They're gaslighting the masses into questioning reality en masse, thus making reality less stable, and thus making it easier to manipulate on a large scale.
            Aliens are currently not possible in the average person's view of reality and so they have enormous amounts of trouble manifesting.
            Will that still be true after Fruit of the Loom makes an entire generation of people question the stability of the timeline?

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        That sounds more like you got MK Ultra'd than it does like you shifted timelines.

        Nope. People were saying that it was odd that the name was "Chic" now, rather than "Chick" which they remember. Now it's changed back!

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          https://archive.4plebs.org/x/thread/37362452/#37365277
          You are likely the victim of gang stalking.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >I did a college dissertation on corporations taking political stands and talked about Chic-fil-A as one of my case studies. I went back and my documents all had Chick-fil-A.
            I experienced a similar problem:
            https://old.reddit.com/r/MandelaEffect/comments/qkqg7k/pok%C3%A9mon_onyx_is_now_onix/
            https://old.reddit.com/r/Retconned/comments/171ad4p/i_remember_onyx_from_pok%C3%A9mon_being_spelled_onyx/
            I distinctly recall specific elements of the Pokemon games (as I played them so much). Those elements changed, including the appearance of the Pokemon AND their names.
            In the same original cartridge that I played, they changed... somehow...
            I spent ages on those games and they all changed... really unsettling.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            I remember you posting that in one of these threads like 2 months ago.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Must've been someone else. I haven't posted about it for like a year and never mentioned Onyx before.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            This is a pretty big one for those who played Pokemon because of how memorable the name is.
            https://old.reddit.com/r/pokemon/comments/i1h3kb/onyx_or_onix/

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Stop existing plebbitBlack person

            [...]

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            This is so whack. It was for sure "Onyx".

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            It was "Onyx" 100% I guarantee you. Everyone remembers it spelt that way...

            The poster on my bedroom wall with all the Pokémon in 99 read Onix, bros.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            I was never Onyx because they can't trademark that name.

            Read the 3rd post in

            https://i.imgur.com/gWdQyao.png

            Somehow when this effect occurs then the physical items of the original product change. All those items from years ago... even from hundreds of years ago... all change!
            Derivative works will also change but it appears that occasionally there is a derivative work which retains the original design/name.
            But our memories (those of us who payed attention to these specific things) remain. I don't get how this happens or why but it is real.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            “Paid” is spelled with an I. Like Onix was!

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            You completely ignored the point

            I was never Onyx because they can't trademark that name.

            Made despite quoting them.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            You're telling me they copyrighted "Kadabra"?
            https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abra_Kadabra_(character)

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            /trademarked.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Interesting example, because that's famously one of the few pokemon they had trouble copyrighting due to Yuri Geller.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            that’s like going to the zoo and getting a trademark for every animal you point at

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            You joke but there's probably a company israeli enough to have tried that. Disney tried to copyright a Mexican holiday.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            I remember Onix’s name being spelled that way because I learned it before the actual word and was surprised to see that it was supposed to be spelled with a Y.

            https://i.imgur.com/ow5qhg6.png

            This is a pretty big one for those who played Pokemon because of how memorable the name is.
            https://old.reddit.com/r/pokemon/comments/i1h3kb/onyx_or_onix/

            Played Red and Blue when they originally launched.
            Onix has always been Onix in my verse. Since at least the release year of Pokemon Red in the US.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            I remember Onix’s name being spelled that way because I learned it before the actual word and was surprised to see that it was supposed to be spelled with a Y.

      • 1 month ago
        RON_MEXICO_BWC

        For me it was ALWAYS two L’s because I remember making a stupid joke to myself to remember it by: Chick fill’ed (up by) A (big wiener). I know, dumb, doesn’t make a whole lot of sense, but I was doing that from the very beginning.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          You are Mexican. Your brain doesn't work properly. We all understand.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >Everyone I see complaining about it swears that the name was originally Chic-Fil-A.
        Wait....just googled and IT'S NOT CHIC FIL A?? They're just fricking with us now, it was chic fil a within the past year

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      What are you talking about? Everyone I see complaining about it swears that the name was originally Chic-Fil-A.

      It was Chik fil a. Then Chic. Now Chick... this is just too weird...

  7. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Sometime in the early 2000s for me. I very distinctly remember thinking of a cornucopia as both a thanksgiving decoration and the thing on the Fruit of the Loom logo when I was around 4 or 5 in 1999 or 2000.

  8. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Three 35mm prints scanned, no braces.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      The scene only makes sense if she has braces. It's literally the entire reason why the villain does, to set up this subplot climax.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >literally the only person to ever show concern for Jaws' wellbeing, instead of just assuming he's indestructible
        The scene makes perfect sense.
        I've also never heard ANYONE remember braces in any other scene with her, since she isn't wearing braces.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          Some people remember a scene where Dolly and Jaws kiss and their braces get stuck, my dad being one of them. I didn't even have to mention that to him for him to notice it was "missing", he saw the film during its original theatrical release run. No evidence the scene exists though.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            When did that scene happen? Can your dad say what happened before and after? Why did they focus on them kissing in that scene, and also the other scene? Why don't their braces stick in the second?

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            He doesn't remember too much other than he thinks it happens later in the film in the space shuttle. I will admit he doesn't have the greatest memory in general. Memory is fallible in just about everyone but I think there are certain people who especially unintentionally fabricate things to fill in gaps or if something seems like it could've happened they're convinced it was something they indeed remember.
            The whole old school big headgear nerd braces trope most people are aware of and most people can recognise the one where two geeky or nerdy types kiss and get their braces get stuck together so the image or perception of big braces could get mixed up with that.
            It is odd that so many also seem to remember that scene though because I didn't mention it to him, only that her braces are now missing in that scene where her and Jaws smile at each other and he said "and also they kiss and they get stuck"
            Also mentioned here:
            https://www.reddit.com/r/Retconned/comments/7axbv4/moonraker_dollys_braces_kissing_scene/
            https://mandelaeffect.fandom.com/wiki/Dolly%27s_Braces
            https://www.ar15.com/forums/general/Dolly--WITH-braces/5-2639222/

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >It is odd that so many also seem to remember that scene though because I didn't mention it to him
            He could've heard it from somewhere else and then forgotten.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Maybe but remember he saw the film during its original theatrical run, he even remembers the theatre where he saw it so I tend to believe he saw that scene or thinks he saw it.

  9. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Time War confirmed

  10. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    I literally don't get why you would jump dimensions to just change one letter in the name of a fricking Pokemon for fricks sake...

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Why would you assume that's the only thing that changed, or that it was the main purpose of the jump?

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Because people are morons and think that somehow is they misremembered meaningless it or something it must be the work of a magical world change or whatever and can never be the fault of their dumb brain

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        It was "Onyx" 100% I guarantee you. Everyone remembers it spelt that way...

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous
    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      It’s pretty obvious in the other timeline the Pokémon creators are the ones who named it differently.

      I have it on good authority that:

      1. There are ~9000 other timelines in the multiverse.
      2. We are in the main / prime / foundational timeline.
      3. There are other timelines because certain souls on Earth have to go through a very specific lesson before the coming soul harvest.
      4. There is a soul harvest coming, literally any day now.
      5. Two options come Armageddon: a/ if you have repented your sin, and truly repented, you will ascend to higher dimensional/vibration/whatver, or b/ go to hell. But hell is not fire and brimstone. Hell is 144,000 years of getting everything you ever wanted all the time. Pretty much sounds OK, but quickly gets old. Idea is option A is more rewarding.
      6. Quantum mechanics states as light is refracted at a certain “angle of incidence” (? I’m totally butchering this…) that it is expected to go a certain path, but there are other “crazy paths” it could potentially take.
      7. In 15% of timelines, Arnold Schwarzenegger never becomes famous. This leads to “Last Action Hero” star becoming Sylvester Stallone, who in the movie points at Jean-Claude Van Damm as the movie star. In the timelines where Sylvester Stallone isn’t famous, Jean-Claude Van Damm is the star and he points to Arnold Schwarzenegger in the same movie scene as movie star, in essence causing a musical chairs of Austrian movie stars.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        I’ll go back to my notes about the quantum stuff because I just typed that from memory, and I don’t know anything about quantum mechanics.

  11. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    The Mandella effect is a strategy to cull the schizo herd and eliminate any that aren't capable of rationalizing solipsism.
    It has the side objective of providing case studies to further certain MK Ultra research.

  12. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    I was never Onyx because they can't trademark that name.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      You completely ignored the point [...]
      Made despite quoting them.

      https://i.imgur.com/KdlNROL.jpeg

      You're telling me they copyrighted "Kadabra"?
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abra_Kadabra_(character)

      >they can't trademark that name
      Nor can they trademark "Taurus" though they changed that one to "Tauros" in this timeline, supposedly for monetary purposes.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        So your only counterargument is also one that has changed?

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          You could claim anything is named something because of trademark purposees. They had Abra, Kadabra, Alakazam, all of which can't really be trademarked I think.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >Abra, Kadabra, Alakazam
            Abra and kadabra can be potentialy copyrighted because the original phrase is all one word and also spelled with a c instead of a k(abracadabra). Alakazam I'm not sure about.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Mandela residue:
        https://old.reddit.com/r/pokemon/comments/cf9ntr/always_loved_taurus_always_was_sad_it_couldnt/
        >It's a typo
        In the same title he spells it both "Taurus" and "Tauros." I distinctly recall it being "Taurus."

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          Also if you go through the comments, many people are naturally spelling it "Taurus" without paying attention to the difference in spelling, like they are used to it being spelt that way.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          >In the same title he spells it both "Taurus" and "Tauros."
          The fact that they use both spellings lends more credence to the idea that it's just him misspelling, not less.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Subjective. The fact that they're discussing the nuances of word origin and coming up with new names suggests they would be paying more attention to spelling, not less.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >The fact that they're discussing the nuances of word origin and coming up with new names suggests they would be paying more attention to spelling, not less.
            Are you implying that the post originally only had one spelling?

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Yes: "Mandela residue."

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          You’re wrong. It was always Tauros.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            For you. I played this game a lot. For me, it was 100% Taurus. Quite a few of the names of the more obscure Pokemon are different here. Supposedly all for trademark purposes. I don't think there was as much of a focus on things like that where I came from.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          Also if you go through the comments, many people are naturally spelling it "Taurus" without paying attention to the difference in spelling, like they are used to it being spelt that way.

          Also note how the players only use two spelling variants: Taurus from the original Timeline, and Tauros, from this Timeline. No other variant such as Tauras or Taures is used.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Because those two spellings don't sound as similar, and the misspelling one isn't so much a typo as another actual word in the english language.

  13. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    im gaslighting you

  14. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Isn't the Fruit of the Loom logo a pretty unique case where there's proof the company is just lying about their old logos? Like the pic in

    [...]

    is actual proof that the old logo definitely used to have a cornucopia unlike other cases where the evidence is either minor or completely erased.
    I think Fruit of the Loom specifically should be excluded from other cases because it's likely a deliberate hoax.

  15. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    So many things about the Pokemon games have changed. This creature was called "Paris," not "Paras."
    The images for all of the Pokemon in the Red cartridge have all changed.

  16. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    > Genesis - land of confusion
    This place is very confusing. C3PO has a silver leg now. Go and look on ebay at collector's toys worth hundreds of dollars that have both legs golden... as everyone remembers it.
    COULD WE LIVE IN THE DARK CITY THING AND THEY CHANGE THINGS ALL THE TIME AND MADE MOVIES ABOUT IT AAAAAAA? CRUEL

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >C3PO has a silver leg now
      That's because his leg gets fricked up during one of the movies. It's either during Empire Strikes Back or sometime in between the OG and the new trilogy.
      That's not a Mandella effect, his character design is still all gold if you go watch the OG movies.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        NO IT IS NOT GO LOOK. I JUST TOOK THIS SCREENSHOT RIGHT NOW.

        IT IS HIS CALF. THE GOLDEN CALF HHAAHAHAHHAHAHA ISN'T IT FUNNY BOYS

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          I do believe in mandella effects, but not this type.

          For starters, the comment only says he has no memory of the silver leg, it doesn't say he actually remembers there being 2 gold ones.
          And secondly the difference between silver and gold isn't always that easy to spot, especially when you consider that audiences when this film was released did not see it in the same quality that your screenshot is in.
          Not only has the film itself been improved, but the device you view it on as well. I could easily imagine that he always had a silver leg but it was almost impossible to notice back then.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            I just watched a compilation video to see the leg and I agree with you, 90% of the shots he's in only show him above the knee and almost all the wide shots have him blurry or at an angle so you can't easily discern the color of his leg.
            The screenshot the other anon posted is one of the only ones in that whole movie where it's clearly silver.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            https://www.ebay.com/itm/166775249997
            https://www.ebay.com/itm/326146441076
            These are 2 toys worth 2000 dollars with golden calves. It is not my will to convince you, i just provide proof and will stop posting more things.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            They made Luke toys with yellow lightsabers that were worth a lot of money for the same reason. Star Wars merchandise has a known history of doing weird shit like that.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            > uncirculated figures have now been banned
            What?

  17. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Is there a good example of a Mandela effect that's drastically different? Like more than a few letters, and not based on grainy film?

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Entire movies disappearing?
      Extremely bizarre things have now happened (long ago).
      Perhaps the more extreme is changes to organs.
      Human organs like the Heart and kidney are now in different locations.
      Other things like animals which animal lovers (who always keep abreast of related news) never heard of suddenly exist and are spoken about as though they always existed and were reasonably well known.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        What changed about the location of the heart?

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          It went from "on the left" to "in the center, tilted left".
          It comes from people not understanding that internal organs are not exactly the same among all people. They can be in different places, some slight, some extreme. People can have multiple muscles or blood vessels where the body is "supposed" to have only one.
          Hell, people are born with extra legs and fingers, and born without lungs.
          The body is WAY more variable than most laypersons would accept.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          https://old.reddit.com/r/MandelaEffect/comments/45zjag/consensus_on_discrepancies/
          > Human heart is now almost dead center in the chest? Since when? Its always been off to the left. The liver seems wrong as well. Its too far up and too big.
          Multiple doctors/medical students reporting similar changes.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >western doctors being moronic
            Unless one of them was specifically a heart surgeon I don't consider that impressive evidence. Doctor's knowledge on any body part they don't specifically and actively work on is extremely suspect and often inaccurate. Non specialists are no where near as intelligent or informed as people would like to think.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            One of the reasons they have medical students work with real cadavers is so they can learn about how the human body rarely matches what anatomy books show.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Good, extensive discussion here:
            https://old.reddit.com/r/MandelaEffect/comments/4ds3cd/mandela_effect_human_anatomy_and_bone_structure/
            >Former RN here. I agree with everything you mentioned, plus: the liver is huuuuuge now, and the stomach is not where it used to be. The Heimlich Maneuver doesn't even make sense anymore with the stomach being to the left side now. I have wondered for some time now how this plays out in the medical community. Someone doing an X-RAY and nothing looks like they have learned it in class?! Someone doing a sonogram on a patient, trying to locate the kidneys but they are nowhere to be found in the area that that person remembers?! I wish more medical professionals would come forward with this ME.
            >Intestines zig zagged. Food moved from left to right, down, left to right. The small intestines was neatly stacked on top of the large intestines, which was more or less directly below a circular stomach that wasn't where it is now.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7766054/
            >Many different types of anatomical variants exist, such as supernumerary bony structures, missing or supernumerary muscle heads and bellies, changes in the shape and position of organs and their parts, supernumerary (accessory), missing, aberrant, and rudimentary vessels, and differing numbers of lymph nodes. Even the atavisms and rudiments cannot be omitted, which are known from veterinary and comparative anatomy (hairs, muscle bundles, tuberculum auriculare of Darwini of the auricle, etc.). These structures are common in animals, but it is rare to find them in humans. When found, these abnormalities usually do not impact an individual’s physiology. They can be termed “normal variations”
            These differences are well known and studied. Yes, even the kidneys being in completely the wrong place.
            Did you know some people are born with three kidneys?
            My point with this is not that Mandela is wrong. Go ahead with that.
            My point is that the human body is a terrible example to point to.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            What the hell is wrong with you?
            Experts and students in the field are clearly indicating that the study material has completely changed. You are trying to prove what, exactly? That bodies are different from person to person? Quite the revelation.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            RNs and non specialist doctors are not field experts and the anon brings up a good point.
            An unwillingness to filter out poor examples of Mandella effect will only make it harder to study and understand.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            No, experts in the field which wrote the paper I cited say
            >Yeah, kidneys can be all over the place, livers can be drastically different sizes. We have a whole medical field of study about it.
            >You are trying to prove what, exactly?
            I told you the s in my last sentence.
            The human body has so much variation without the ME that it is a terrible example to support the ME.
            Try to pay attention.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Mandela.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Wasn't that just a misprint in a textbook? Or are there people claiming they personally thought he was dead?

  18. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    we are each individually in our own timelines as outlined by our perceptions.

  19. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    That's the wrong cornucopia. The point was sharper and less bent.
    >inb4 Mandela advocates say I'm just remembering wrong

  20. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    During the late 80s in the southeast it was Chik-fil-A. As other anons said when you're a kid you stare at and ponder words that are misspelled and form bonds and memories. It was Chik because the "k" accentuated the chicken logo's spiked "red hair," and somehow that mentally complemented the spice of the food and the general specialness of eating there, because it was then located in malls, it was rare for a kid at least, which is why adult millennials are perplexed now. It was also Chik because the food arrived speedily, not fast, but not slow. It connoted attitude. It was Chik because the original mall locations were relatively small.

    It was Chik because Chick would not be associated with females for kids back then, for kids, it would subconsciously be tap into images of Tweety bird and baby birds, whereas Chik connotes chicken. It wouldn't be Chic because in a mall that would have a fashion connotation amongst teen girls and moms, who were the biggest customers.

    "Chick" makes zero sense from a branding, aesthetic, cultural, and practical pov. Chik pops in red neon. You want a short brand name for absorption and recognition. See KFC eclipsing Kentucky Fried Chicken.

    Chick is redundant when your logo is a chicken. It's also less effective and redundant to repeat "c' twice in a hyphenated brand name. The spelling of "fil-A" also suggests the brand name is friendly to exotic spellings. If the first word werw formally spelled, the "fil-A" subconsciously become confusing, whereas Chik-fil-A rolls off in a fun way, you don't need to think about it.

    • 1 month ago
      Krishna

      That
      >wewr
      There is the aliens doing the Mandela Effect lol

  21. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    NEW MANDELLA!
    MANDELLA IS DEAD! LONG LIVE THE NEW MANDELLA!
    Dan Povenmire (Voice Actor and Animator: Simpsons, Family Guy, SpongeBob, others...)
    Literally reveals who the new Mandella is:

    MARGOLYES
    IS
    THE
    NEW
    MANDELLA!

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Mandela*

  22. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    2005

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Gud year

  23. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    2001

  24. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Since we are speaking about Mandela effects I would love to bring up two of them for products that I enjoy, kit kats and cheese itz

    I remember that KitKat had a - in the middle and I remember seeing cheese itz having that z in it, but according to people they never had those when I know for a fricking fact they did

  25. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Between 2001 and 2004.

    2002 most likely from my memory personally.
    Definitely not before 2001 though.

    I am 32.

  26. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    I don't know what year but I will say the last time I remember seeing it was either 2013 or 2014. Am I close?

  27. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    It was probably like 2001 or 2002

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *