For argument's sake, if you had the potential to sometimes see the future but it was out of your control, would this eventually mold someone into...

For argument's sake, if you had the potential to sometimes see the future but it was out of your control, would this eventually mold someone into overestimating this ability, leaving someone with specific ideas in their minds about people that are shallow, as to manage to understand people in a very shallow way because it theoretically would make sense even if it's the incorrect thing to do? Suppose this was real and it worked sometimes, would actually learning about people more damage this ability or would it make it even more accurate?

POSIWID: The Purpose Of A System Is What It Does Shirt $21.68

Tip Your Landlord Shirt $21.68

POSIWID: The Purpose Of A System Is What It Does Shirt $21.68

  1. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    I reread your shit 5 times, and I still have no idea what the frick you're asking.

    • 2 months ago
      You probably shouldn't say my name

      this

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        Why shouldn't I say Samanatha?

        • 2 months ago
          You probably shouldn't say my name

          Idk you tell me.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      You are right, someone that understands it should translate it to english for us.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      I'm saying that if you could see the future in a way maybe sometimes and it was out of your control, read people correctly, would this make someone overestimate it in a way where the person has some shallow understanding of people because it would make for them to have an easier time predicting things? I'm not speaking in tongues, here, I'm asking if knowing people more would make things more difficult to predict.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        Most people are simple and algorithmic by nature, you can predict a person’s behavior fairly well by just being around them for a while and being observant

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          Skip the entire being around people part, and use yourself as an example as to how people work. You can't fully understand another human being as you can understand yourself.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      https://i.imgur.com/eDVdOuw.jpg

      this

      You are right, someone that understands it should translate it to english for us.

      This isn't for you.
      Isn't funny how they try to make it so?

      • 2 months ago
        You probably shouldn't say my name

        I'd hope not. It's nonsense.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >Nested parenthetical inside nested parenthetical with run on sentence nonsense…

      If unpredictably seeing the future makes someone judge others shallowly, does learning more about people harm or enhance this ability?

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        What? It's like making up a story about a girl that is able to shoot lasers from her eyes because she ate a radioactive apple, and then you ask us if eating apples that aren't radioactive would enhance or harm her abilities?
        I don't know man, it's your hypothetical situation, you can make the story continue in any way you want.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          This is why having ID’s on a board is a good thing… It’s not my hypothetical. I was trying to help the people asking for a translation into normal English.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            Yeah, you can assume I was telling that to OP directly.

  2. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    It makes it more accurate
    Checked

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Wouldn't I need a really good example of people so I could improve on this? How can I do that?

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        No, every example furthers knowledge

        https://i.imgur.com/1ce8IV0.jpg

        Idk you tell me.

        Oops, sorry

  3. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Shamanathah
    hahahahahaha

  4. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    I'm going to explain it in a really simple way and in a greentext so you might understand what I'm asking
    >person sees future sometimes
    >can't control it
    >can predict things to an extent
    >this happens more
    >the person who is able to do this gets some type of confidence in what is happening
    >relies on it more
    >people seem predictable because of this
    >eventually think that everyone is this way
    >even though it's not true
    >image of people is a specific way that makes it easier to predict things
    I'm asking if knowing more affects this in a bad way

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      The more you know about human nature the easier they are to predict
      But that really has nothing to do with the future predictions you've been given / talking about
      You shouldn't really be 'relying' on those predictions at all, ever
      And you shouldn't be boxing yourself into a corner where you think everyone will match your predictions because you've predicted a few people correctly a few times
      People don't work like that
      The predictions don't work like that

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        I'm not even saying these things are true, but if someone were to have this ability and it were to happen often, would it really be wrong to trust in the fact that it happens? Imagine someone who previously never even as much knew that it was happening and it only became something this person became aware of later in life, and even after becoming aware it still happened. I would try and do something to improve it, but it really seems like it's something completely out of the control of anyone. It would need to be worked on somehow, but I have no clue how this would go.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          You can trust that it happens, that's the lesson to be learned but at the same time you don't want to go overboard as it's easy for ego to manifest illusions that you don't want to follow
          From my own experience its always been something different and not really something to be acted upon but something to show you that there is more at play
          It's definitely not something you can train into giving yourself the lottery numbers
          It's only there for the most strict highest purpose
          That purpose will be unveiled in time
          Thats the other lesson - patience

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            From the way I see it, it should have been something that stopped entirely once I became aware of it. The issue being that it didn't, and now it happens and I'm aware of it, making me question a lot of things. As you mentioned earlier, I don't really rely on it in any way seeing as it is completely out of my control, but there are times where I think to myself that if I enter a specific mood or state of being, that it becomes more likely to happen. Or maybe not, maybe I'm again overestimating myself and I can't actually have any control over it. Sometimes it can happen so often that I feel like I'm being lied to somehow and that these things are fabrications of my own mind.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Sorry, but this is what happens when you collapse all of what you're saying into a single question:
      >If you were able to predict things, would it make it more difficult to predict things?
      Now, let's change the subject so you can see the reason we don't understand what you are asking, I'm the anon that mentions chess everyday on /x/:
      >If you trained yourself to become better at chess, would that make it harder to win chess games?
      ???

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        There are two reasons why it ended up as a word salad, one of them being because I don't like talking about it because it makes me feel like I've completely lost it, second because I really don't know how to describe these things very specifically.

  5. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    I'm an apprentice in these matters, sometimes I feel like I'm completely insane, but the truth is that there are people out there similar to myself that have managed to become experts. The only issue I see with this is that apparently there are none on /x/ with any advice that might be useful.

  6. 2 months ago
    Vicar-Devil

    If you trained yourself to comprehend all of human nature, the variables are not merely limited to this and a temporal event can change based on your prediction alone, especially due to the fact that you are not alone when this occurs, thus the input/output of flux in/out of the system creates divergent results. Free will is not limited to human mentality alone. The variables exceed what can be mapped outside of flux.

    Whilst you could reasonably expect to establish the eventuality of a certain event, the free will inherent in those related and seemingly unrelated can make it take longer to happen because the system is calculating what needs to occur to achieve the event.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Good.
      Now, can you rewrite the OP's question in that style so the rest of people can understand what was the question you were answering?
      We are kind of in the dark regarding context in this one.

      • 2 months ago
        Vicar-Devil

        If you understood human nature, would you assume all up and down people with an error ratio because of the very fact you learned it and applied it in a quantum event system that surprises even you.

        The op has a thought that he does not fully know how to relate because of the interference of a will-based error to his logic, which has proven to be an evolution toll since he now sees this.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          So basically you can't predict what other people will do, because your very prediction produces a different future where they do something else?

          • 2 months ago
            Vicar-Devil

            Even if they do not do something else, the events leading up to the situation are altered so the time and place differs from your vision. If this is not how your vision is come to fruition, then you have been told by a force which extracted you out of the temporal progression to show you the vision, then put you back with only a memory of it which you rarely will look at if ever so as to retain such certain events.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            Thanks, I think it's clear now.
            As a summary of the thread, the OP was posing a question related to a reality in where someone can know the future, but this is not possible because there was a future where they didn't try to predict it, and the act of trying to predict it changed its course to a different future where this person tried to predict it.
            They don't match because they're clearly different, so no, someone couldn't begin doing this so well that it would make them overestimate their chances of knowing how people will act.

  7. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    As someone who regularly dreams of future events in vivid detail. You sound crazy.

  8. 2 months ago
    Vicar-Devil

    Keep well your lies for the time is drawing close.

  9. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Potential to see the future without your control? Well, you would be basically running around screaming about Monado.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      It's not as large and eventful as what some would imagine. For the most part, I predict smaller things that hold no significance to anyone that isn't myself. Not always, but most of the time. I serve myself only, and this causes issues.

      • 2 months ago
        Vicar-Devil

        Accurate orchestration of a human can be done by certain forces and the prediction does not have to be temporally related.

        But I do not want to discuss that much anymore.

  10. 2 months ago
    Vicar-Devil

    The angels bear witness to all but the full face of God. Mans memory can be pretended by them, so they see a memory as a possible hoax.

  11. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    No one should need a grammar Sherpa to figure out what you’re trying to say. Learn to write shorter sentences and parse them into chunks that make sense. Practicing this skill will help you organize your thoughts better.

    >Indeed, it is of paramount importance to recognize that no individual, in their quest for understanding, ought to necessitate the specialized assistance of a grammar guide, akin to a Sherpa, a guide in the high Himalayas, to decipher or unravel the essence and underlying meaning of your communicated message. Engaging in the meticulous practice of composing sentences that are succinct, devoid of unnecessary verbosity, and to further dissect these carefully crafted sentences into segments, or logical components, that are coherent and easily digestible, serves as a commendable endeavor. This diligent practice of this particular skill set, an exercise in clarity and conciseness, will significantly aid in the enhancement of your ability to structure and organize your thoughts, a collection of ideas and insights, in a manner that is not only considerably more effective but also immensely beneficial for the recipient of your message.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >comes to /x/ where the standard is vague posting
      >gets upset when someone vague posts

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        I’m not upset about OP’s nearly incoherent, rambling, disjointed writing style. I was trying to help OP. Let me put it a different way.

        >Ah, you talk like a gay, and your shit’s all moronic.

  12. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    are your initials D.M?

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Nope.

  13. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Frick off cabal gay! Your time is up, leave this quadrant of the galaxy or suffer the consequnces of all whom you have slain for the past 100,000+ years! You lived by the sword, now you shall die by the sword!

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *