Do people here really worship Thoth/Hermes?

You must be a neophyte Thoth jettisons your worship as blasphemy. Thoth knows only God is worthy of worship, and Thoth is humble enough to know that he is not God.

It's All Fucked Shirt $22.14

UFOs Are A Psyop Shirt $21.68

It's All Fucked Shirt $22.14

  1. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    I mean I give prayers and honors to him, but I wouldn't say I "worship" him.

    I "worship" his Father, King of the Gods, THE GREAT THUNDERER, ZEUS, LORD OF LIGHTNING, SON OF CRONOS

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Uranus and Earth begat Chronos who begat Zeus, But Uranus and Earth would not exist if not for the uncreated Creator. I implore you to think bigger.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >the more firster means more bigger means more goddier God! We must only worship the unnamed mystery God that split chaos in two then fricked off forever

        This is like renting a house, but refusing to pay ANY rent to the current legal owner, only to the mexican day laborer that dug the footings and formed the concrete. This is pure abrahamic mental illness

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          Actually, he was speaking of the Greek pantheon

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            He specifically mentioned how instead of Zeus, we should worship who came before him (Cronos), but before him had even MORE before Gods (Uranus), and I guess the only God worth worshiping is the mostest firstest God ever, who doesn't even have a name and could very well be just a physical property of the universe. "Implore you to think bigger" means "worship the God of Israel, because he says he's the first, and therefore best"

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Well, yeah. They aren't corporeal entities. They're just fricking metaphors. It's more sensible to honestly acknowledge a deeper metaphor's worth than to simplify it and idolize it. A cup of Joe is just a nice mug of coffee, anon.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            I don't recall a first-est god in the Greek pantheon, unless you worship the Primordial chaos.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Did you read the post you're replying to? These gods are just symbols for abstract philosophical metaphors and archetypes. And yes, the Greeks did have a "first-est god." Look up "Monad".

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            > These gods are just symbols for abstract philosophical metaphors and archetypes
            Ah, you're an atheist. Carry on. You've won the debate or whatever! They built marble temples and golden statues and attributed extremely specific characteristics to abstract ideas

            >And yes, the Greeks did have a "first-est god." Look up "Monad"
            I'm aware of "THE monad", which was not a specific God but a cognomen for "whateverthefrick was the first thing". Pythagoreans reduced the concepts from shape>field>line>point>integers/value>dyad(two things, binary separateness)>monad(singular thing, indivisible). It's not the name of a being to pray to, just a foundational concept of measurement.

            [...]
            The first girl who dies in Lain does the classic Hermes pose before jumping

            Oh my god you're right

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            No, I'm not an atheist. I'm also both of the people you just replied to.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >These gods are just symbols
            Gods are Gods. If they were symbols, they wouldn't be Gods. If you believe Zeus is just a symbol of, what, the power of storms and the divine right of kings? That's quite different from believing Zeus is the King of Heaven, Son of Cronos, who wields the Aegis. Symbols are incapable of wielding an Aegis. And you may have a more enlightened view, that Zeus represents some 10th dimensional force of whatever, but to say he is just a symbol is to say some Bronze Age dickhead came up with cool stories about his dead friend, which became a superstition, and then a religion.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >If it's a symbol is HAS to be a moronic, oversimplified symbol
            Oh, anon. One day, you will see.

            ?si=1qcIKhCFCrHDkoQj

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >just a foundational concept of measurement
            Yes, that's what the uttermost God is supposed to symbolize

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >Did you read the post you're replying to?
            The post that said there was a god before Uranus? wut.
            >Monad
            That's not from "the Pantheon" and a completely different concept. Uranus appeared first, therefore, Uranus is the Monad=1. Before Uranus was the Primordial chaos=0, which wins because others are merely first, while that's zeroth.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Fair enough. Look into Unified Field theory. I think you'll like it.

  2. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    you worship thoth under different names.

    sorta like...i frickin' want mcdonalds fries. simple as.

  3. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    but thoth is a god though? tf are you smoking? did you forget about greek polytheism LOL

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      a god is different from God.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        so why did greeks worship hermes tho?

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          If they did, it was due to a lack of understanding, since anyone can be misguided.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Are you morons trying to turn Hermes into the next Lucifer or something? Maybe just don't try to tackle what you don't actually understand while parading around the internet telling everyone you do. It takes more than memorizing wiki pages to understand Hermeticism. If anything this thread shows a unique overestimation of where almost all of you are on the path.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >Are you morons trying to turn Hermes into the next Lucifer or something?
            Lucifer is Satan, so no. In case you try to argue this point, see pic related, Lucifer is a latin term and the Bible wasn't written in latin.
            > Maybe just don't try to tackle what you don't actually understand
            this is projection, you think you know more than me without reason to. It must be you whose path needs reconsideration if Hermeticism has lead you to becoming a pagan

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >quotes the bible
            You lost your argument there you uneducated ignorant christcuck. There's nothing credible about a book written by anonymous israelites.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            you're the one who brought up "Lucifer"

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            There is no etymological connection between Lucifer and Satan

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            How can the one who brings LIGHT be satan?
            Satan is the whip god use when you go out of the way, to bring you back. Lucifer is divine knowledge.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Because the Greeks translated the Hebrew "Shining One, son of Dawn" to mean bringer of dawn, and when the Septuagint was made into Latin they translated "bringer of dawn" to the latin word for light-bringer. How's your verbal IQ?

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Bringer of Dawn = Lightbringer midwitt

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >X=Y therefore Lucifer is... le GOOD

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Nobody ITT had said a positive word about Lucifer.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            they did
            >Lucifer is divine knowledge.

            https://i.imgur.com/AIwVU2U.png

            How can the one who brings LIGHT be satan?
            Satan is the whip god use when you go out of the way, to bring you back. Lucifer is divine knowledge.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          To counter act superstition and divine crime

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        > is humble enough to know that he is not God.
        >a god is different from God.
        that only makes sense under a monotheist abrahamic lens

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          Have you considered that that might be the lens which Thoth views the world? The book of Enoch clearly speaks of the Father, Son, and Lord of Spirits.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          Eh not really Egyptians had the godhead . . .

          Basically just God and archangels but archangels are literally just called gods and not the God or godhead

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        > is humble enough to know that he is not God.
        >a god is different from God.
        that only makes sense under a monotheist abrahamic lens

        Yeah, this idea seems to be coming from the already come to conclusion that the Abrahamic God is the ultimate capital G God.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          if the Abrahamic god is really the God of Christ, the uncreated Creator of the universe, then yeah.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            You're coming at this with a conclusion that you've already reached. Who is to say that that uncreatedness isn't some primordial chaos which spawned god/gods?

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            if there were multiple gods with the same amount of power, how could the universe stay ordered? and how would chaos produce order?

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            “Energy flows where attention goes”. . . “Nothing is true, everything is permitted.”
            The Gods need us and we need them. They created and killed us and vice versa

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >if there were multiple gods with the same amount of power, how could the universe stay ordered?
            Helps if they have a King and are ruled by a fairly cohesive family.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            An anti-symbolic view of religion is just as narrow, misguided, and simplistic as being an atheist.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >An anti-symbolic view of religion is just as narrow, misguided, and simplistic as being an atheist.
            What, do I have to put an asterisk over "King" and "Family" and "ruled" to remind everyone that it's just according to our 3D human brain's understanding? Some un-understandable shit is going on "up there", for sure, but there's a set of handlebars for us to hold onto called canon, so may as well use them. No need for the distain.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Sorry, man. Was confusing you with other anons ITT who seem to have a kind of deep-seated reductionist standpoint

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Philosophy and Logic

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Your israeli god is not God either moron.

  4. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Ra is the one true God

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Obelisk's very solid imo

  5. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    This pointless discussion "but my God is more real than yours" being continued in 2024 is the only spooky thing on this board - why do you care about the messenger more than about the message?

    Forget I asked, have fun.

  6. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    tehuti reveals a lot of knowledge for those who would be responsible and choose responsibility

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      i just want people to know that he wouldn't call on them to worship him

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        I don't think a metaphorical symbol is really capable of giving a frick

  7. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >You must be a Neophyte
    >Entire thread is a bunch of Neophytes arguing with each other about an allegory they don't yet understand
    You guys may as well be arguing the semantics of a crossword puzzle. The solution is on the next page.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      At least ten puzzles that share a piece of roughly similar color and shape.
      Distinctions matter.
      Ancient Egyptian mythology != Ancient Greek religion != syncretic Hellenism != Hermeticism != Medieval Christian syncretism (Hermes as Enoch, etc.) != Golden Dawn/Qabalah != Thelema != Neopaganism != Maurice Doreal != Drunvalo Melchizedek.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Forgot to include the eleventh Hermes-tradition, Jungian psychoanalysis.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          I agree with your points. Sorry, forgot to reply

  8. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Sorta

  9. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >Thoth knows only God is worthy of worship,
    The sage points at the moon and the fool examines the finger.

  10. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Maybe not worship, but I know they are the cool Wisdom Pals.

  11. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    You guys haven’t seen all the hidden Hermes pictures this world has to offer. It’s not even that secret. I like the one in the William Durant history books

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      One example

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      https://i.imgur.com/HeRP8Ny.jpg

      One example

      The first girl who dies in Lain does the classic Hermes pose before jumping

  12. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    nobody - its all larpers. the read something about it - saw a few yt videos and tthen went to /x/
    They will tell you "yeah ..no....its...another but the same you know.. under another name and so on...saw it somewhere dude..its all the same, im a super mystical believer" ...
    ...NO SINGLE ONE.
    The thing is - and this LARPERS dont get it due to their low iq is: there were reasons to believe in one or another "god" or "entity" - and there were only three:
    - cultural pressure. (to live in an entirly christian society and anyone not christian will be killed as example)
    - to gain what was promised (wealth, health, power etc to overcome a SPECIAL enemy or situation IN THAT TIME - no excluses)
    - to be on the political "right" side (same as above: SPECIAL persons and individuals, other religions at that time, different cultures in other regions)

    NOTHING, N O T H I N G fits to a human in THIS timeline here and now besides you live as an Bushman with his clicking-noise language in bumfrick nowhere african outlands. But even them wouldnd culture that religion, not even knowing whats going on in the far away west.
    Could mention more - but its larp by logic.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Fricken' moron

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        ideology is for 21. centure when its about ideals in the very first moments of ancient times

        >>is a pissed off 16 years old american that dont even notice i clearly wrote down all that is nessecary how to debunk larpers (by facts)

        >>cant read more then one sentence without searchy for a meme pic.

        haha...you used your time to search for a meme but didnt read..
        You are the moron.

        >> Little timmy is angry and likes to post meme pics in honst discussions.

        >>no frick off neet kiddo

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >there were reasons to believe in one or another "god" or "entity" - and there were only three
      >lists three atheist copes
      Those are three pretty gay reasons. You think everyone on earth who believes in some kind of god goes home and thinks "haha I don't actually believe in this junk"?

      And if you believe in some other god for some reason other than those three, please PLEASE let us know so we can go to sleep laughing.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >go to sleep
        >5pm EST
        Hello, British subhuman

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          No no, you misunderstand me, I will much later go to sleep laughing at the thought of some midwit assuming the first time anyone ever TRUUUUUUULY believed in a God and wasn't just faking it/caving to social pressure was when HIS specific God wandered in

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            I don't understand your perspective. Are you atheist? Are you a literalist pagan?

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            The way I describe my belief is this: The stories we have that were given to prophets are the bronze-age 3rd dimensional being version of things that did happen, for the most part, but many things were likely so complex and strange that they could only be described in that language as "Cronos cut off his father's penis, and it became Aphrodite". Whatever the penis was, or if it was a kind of penis able to do such things, I have no idea.

            Similarly, for example, Hephaestus was described by many as having statues or wheeled tripods that moved about, listened to his words and reacted as if they were men of flesh. Today we hear this and think "oh clearly those were robots", but back then that was the best they could describe them. And perhaps they weren't even robots! But it's something we can add to the list of things we know about Hephaestus: had something like robots, maybe.

            On the scale of symbolic interpretation, with 1 being "literal magic penis fell into the literal ocean" and 10 being "there wasn't even an Uranus, we have no idea", I'd say I'm solidly a 5

            Sorry, man. Was confusing you with other anons ITT who seem to have a kind of deep-seated reductionist standpoint

            I am beginning to think I am doing that as well.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Oh. You were the same guy. Jesus fricking christ. Alright guys, I'm out. I have better things to do than sit here debating philosophy with people who don't read

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >debating philosophy with people who don't read
            Ironically, I have a philosophy degree and have LIKELY read more first-order sources on this than yourself.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            so you know that Plato said Cronus/Gaia were created gods, although I think he (Plato) said that chaos/matter were eternal, but that doesn't mean he thought chaos spawned God, but that God created Cronos and Gaia from the eternal chaos/matter.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        its about THE REASONS why you believe.
        normal people believe cause they want something out of it.
        Call it absolution, call it Peace, call it a better Self.
        Its in the end this: to want something.

        the other ones are the one that got dictated on.
        By the way - go in some bibliotheca - science of religions (you can get a pass for one of some universites for a few bucks) - instead of writing something - read a book now and then.

  13. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    I don’t worship Thoth but follow the sacred teachings of Thoth.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      That's probably the way. But what do you think of the book of the law by Crowley? I tend to believe that it was inspired by satan rather than thoth, I don't think Thoth would be keen on "do as thou wilt" which, according to my intuition, leads to disorder

  14. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Where'd you get this info that Thoth knows only God is worthy of worship?

    Do you have a source which has Thoth telling people not to worship him?

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >Do you have a source
      I'm as sure as I can be that I do.
      Also echoed, probably, in the Corpus Hermeticum - althought the Hermetica is not a primary source of Thoth's words, because it was embellished by the Greeks during translation. They saw parallels between Thoth and Hermes and adopted Thoth as Hermes, but they put a Greek spin on the more ancient texts. The Corpus is not my source, however.

  15. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    In spite of all his words, Thoth fell and joined the annunaki war of conquest. He can go get fricked.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *