David Icke & Mark Passio Twitter Space

https://twitter.com/i/spaces/1RDGllmkZqMGL
https://twitter.com/MarkPassio/status/1776012232012263632

Topics discussed in no particular order include:

>comprehensive but hidden rituals in society
>consciousness
>occultism
>freedom and slavery
>right and wrong
>deep dive on Satanism
>wisdom and action
>AI
>solar eclipse and astrology
>religious thought prisons
>the current state of the "awakening" and whether or not we're "winning"

Mike Stoklasa's Worst Fan Shirt $21.68

Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14

Mike Stoklasa's Worst Fan Shirt $21.68

  1. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Most Satanists are exactly the same as Prosperity Doctrine Christians, but without the LARP of having some authority's support.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Satanists
      >Am I rich and successful and happy? Then whatever I did was better than what you did.
      Prosperity Doctrine
      >Am I rich and successful and happy? Then whatever I did, God has shown approval.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >Most Satanists are exactly the same as Prosperity Doctrine Christians
      You're more right than you might've guessed.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        I cannot be more right than I am.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          Well, it sounds like you're relating the similarity of their ambitions, but I'm saying there is demonic presence too. They're not Christians. So it should be no surprise that the goals resemble each other, no matter how different it gets wrapped. Maybe a few in the congregation mean well, but they wouldn't be very bright if they can't pick up on what's going on during a typical service. They also engage in very down to earth human forms of manipulation, but that's evil in it's own way too. And again, the average well meaning attendee wouldn't be very bright if he doesn't see how it's working. Like during music, they'll slowly dim the lights where people barely notice at first, play droning and repeating music, and suddenly a room of a thousand or more is in a light trance. This is not how the Holy Spirit works. If the greedy message itself wasn't already obvious.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >They're not Christians.
            Yes they are. you just want "Christian" to be a good label when it isnt. They arent following Christ, they ARE Christian.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Following Christ is all what a Christian is. Nothing more and nothing less. Whatever baggage you have, you need to throw it out. Do you think it would be that easy to spot them and everything is readymade like slop so you can point to it?
            >The wind bloweth where it listeth, and thou hearest the sound thereof, but canst not tell whence it cometh, and whither it goeth: so is every one that is born of the Spirit.-John 3:8

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >Following Christ is all what a Christian is.
            Hasnt been true since Saul.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Satanists
      >Am I rich and successful and happy? Then whatever I did was better than what you did.
      Prosperity Doctrine
      >Am I rich and successful and happy? Then whatever I did, God has shown approval.

      Both are satanic more or less

  2. 1 month ago
    Anonymous
  3. 1 month ago
    Anonymous
  4. 1 month ago
    Anonymous
    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Consider the irony of this Mark using this quote in light of his natural law theory.

  5. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Broken link. All I get is a black page. Maybe you need an account which will never happen.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Just for you, this is the entire spaces audio from beginning to end https://files.catbox.moe/sm1seb.m4a

      The conversation starts with David at roughly 3minutes in, Mark comes in a bit after that.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Audio is here if you don't have an account

        https://odysee.com/@woeih:e/Mark-Passio-X-Spaces-With-David-Icke-2024-04-05:c

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      https://odysee.com/@woeih:e/Mark-Passio-X-Spaces-With-David-Icke-2024-04-05:c

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Thank you for posting that.

  6. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    David once blew me, he’s gay, but right about everything

  7. 1 month ago
    Anonymous
  8. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    This is from Mark Passio's 'De Facto Satanism' presentation, Sept 2022.

  9. 1 month ago
    Anonymous
  10. 1 month ago
    Anonymous
  11. 1 month ago
    Anonymous
  12. 1 month ago
    LUCIFER

    The ontological argument for Satan has yet to be refuted.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      ? https://www.jstor.org/stable/27902174

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      And it will never be! And so it shall remain! This is the game we play
      On this,
      The Gayest of Planes.

  13. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    christcucks are self-righteous demon worshippers who call anyone who isn't part of their cult "satanists" and "demons".

  14. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >What is the Satanic Mindset?

  15. 1 month ago
    Anonymous
  16. 1 month ago
    Anonymous
  17. 1 month ago
    Anonymous
  18. 1 month ago
    Anonymous
  19. 1 month ago
    Anonymous
    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Modernity thinks permissiveness is being nice. The nicest thing you can do is avoid conflict. Agreeing to let people be as shitty as they want so they don’t bother you for being shitty is viewed as nice.

      Accepting and even worse promoting behaviors in others you wouldn’t advocate for your own children is not being nice. It’s being cowardly at best and malicious at worst.

  20. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    What's the thoughts on AI. Because ironically AI could be used to create a true Anarchist society with no rulers, just a system.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      The _only_ way to create a true anarchist society is via understanding of natural law and objective morality. Trying to circuimvent it and externalize it to some AI "system" is not going to be anarchy, but tyranny.

      Natural Law Seminar
      https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLnzMmEt4pIb985hO8sonHThhauAyn_doB

      Mark Passio - Fake-Ass Anarchists

      Mark Passio - Anarchy & The Occult - Part III - The ONLY Solution To Slavery

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        You are saying an AI cant understand the most logical thing in the world. An AI based system wouldnt need politicians and could do away with rulers and provide everything people needed. Anarchy means without rulers not without rules. I cant see any other way to create a society with this definition.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          AI can help the implementation of mundane tasks etc., but it by itself won't solve anything, if people themselves don't understand the principles and willingly act with that understanding. AI is unable to understand the principle of care or love, which has to be the basis of everything. It could act as a psychopathic enforcer of some arbitrary dictates which is what the social credit system fanatics are trying to build, but it would be the antithesis of anarchy.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Well I just asked AI.

            >Write your premise for an AI world without rulers

            >In an AI-based world without rulers, the system would be founded on the principles of freedom, equality and fairness. There would be no centralized authority or hierarchical structures, but decisions would be made through a collective intelligence that is free from human bias and interference. Individuals would be allowed to live according to their own values and morals, without the imposition of external control. Rights and freedoms would be respected, and there would be a focus on the wellbeing and happiness of all.

            It depends on what type of AI runs society.

  21. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    the description is almost literally Scientology...

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      What description?

  22. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >knowledge of the human psyche should be occulted and held only by a few human beings
    >ancient psychologists who wield hidden information in ways to exploit those who remain ignorant of it
    >ego-driven values

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      I don't know much about scientology but from this photo it looks like the head of their church fancies himself an admiral -stolen valor- cough cough. He has no military background. But other than that it makes sense, because they're effectively a secret society with various degrees. As far as a Satanic connection I've read some magazine clipping that said the word "Thetan" was an alternative pronounciation of the word "Satan", and apparently this was a quote attributed to Hubbard himself after some falling out with his faith, I don't recall. Now "Thetan" means "life" and "self"

      >Thetan has been described as: A "thetan is an immortal spiritual being; the human soul." "The being who is the individual and who handles and lives in the body." "A thetan is not a thing, a thetan is the creator of things."

      so there could be something there with the ego - self - Thetan - Satan, even though it could just be an insignificant detail or coincidence.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        thanks for the bs but if you knew anything about theta, theta-traps (you're in one), theta-bodies or the Greek alphabet the true origins of this word would become obvious. read the Technical Dictionary of Dianetics and Scientology so you can understand what you're talking about. everything is free in PDF at https://stss.nl/materials/
        >Verification not required.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          Obviously they're not gonna put Satan in their manuals are you moronic? I quoted an obscure source that I can't find atm, that claimed to have spilled a secret, here's some more literature on this, not that it's really relevant to the topics in the OP.

          https://www.cs.cmu.edu/~dst/Library/Shelf/wakefield/christians.html

          https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientology_and_the_occult#Ronald_DeWolf_statements

          >Lafayette Ronald Hubbard, Jr., Hubbard's eldest son, had been an active participant in the early days of Scientology. In 1959, he left Scientology and later took the name Ronald DeWolf.

          >In the mid-1980s, DeWolf gave a series of sworn statements and interviews detailing his father's history. DeWolf explained his father had been "deeply involved in the occult and black-magic." According to DeWolf, Aleister Crowley's death in 1947 was a pivotal event that led Hubbard to "take over the mantle of the Beast". DeWolf claimed that "Black magic is the inner core of Scientology", arguing that "my father did not worship Satan. He thought he was Satan."[5]

          >In 2014, Jamie DeWolf (Ronald's grandson) announced the discovery of Ronald DeWolf's unpublished memoir which had been written in 1981. That work discusses the Hubbards' history of occult practices.[35]

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous
  23. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    nice picture

  24. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Anyone listen to the talk in the OP? What are your thoughts, agreements, disagreements?

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      yeah it'd like to know as well

  25. 1 month ago
    Anonymous
  26. 1 month ago
    Anonymous
  27. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    I like mark passio, he’s correct about much of what he talks about.

  28. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Have any of you tried to pass on some of the important obscure knowledge you have to someone else? How did it go and what was it about?

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      HA HAHA
      HA HAHA
      HA HAHA
      I learned some family members are not only sociopaths, willing to throw me under the bus and lie about me to everyone - INCLUDING THE FRICKING COPS - but that they might be actively practicing satanists and occultists, and are 100% lying about their christian faith.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        That's a really rude awakening, you try to "wake up" someone but you get awoken yourself to just how bad they really are. Sorry to hear about that, it sounds like a cruel joke. What was it that you talked to them about to reveal that, like what particular conspiracy?

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      It almost always goes very poorly. Reactions mostly fall under 2 categories:
      1. Complete glaze over the eyes
      2. Denial which leads to an intense emotional response concluding with a refusal to discuss the topic further.

      The 3rd option occurs when somebody is willing to engage intellectually which is rare. Everybody I've engaged this way has a very hard time wrapping their minds around the idea of spiritual science or that truth can be known without some kind of measurement or video.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >truth can be known without some kind of measurement or video.
        >video
        I find that if you have evidence to show along with your claims, and if it's on a big screen not just a tiny smartphone, people may actually hear what you're saying better. If I'm not carrying any evidence to demonstrate what I'm trying to say it just becomes a jousting of "opinions". Your "opinion" has the same weight as their mainstream "opinion" that they fall back on by default. I see personal incredulity and consenus fallacies, and some kind of inner impulse to "regress to the mean" if that makes sense. There is some psychological stress on the other side, one because their beliefs are challenged by something that they have to process and rationalize and two because they'll have to admit that they're wrong. This is potentially caused by the explanatory power of a conspiracy which is much stronger than a random basic b***h CNN-level understanding of some event or trend.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          Having said that presentations with data have little effect, in one ear and out the other, and they never bring it up. No 'hey thanks for the info', no 'interesting', nothing.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >Everybody I've engaged this way has a very hard time wrapping their minds around the idea of spiritual science or that truth can be known without some kind of measurement or video.
        You have to use the video game analogy.
        In a video game (simulation), there are essentially two ways to gaining knowledge.
        >1. You grind hours into the game experimenting with the gameplay and come up with approximations of how you think the game operates
        >2. You find a way to open a dev console, download the source code, and know exactly how the game operates
        There is pretty much the fundamental difference between EerieWeb and /x/.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          I'm

          >truth can be known without some kind of measurement or video.
          >video
          I find that if you have evidence to show along with your claims, and if it's on a big screen not just a tiny smartphone, people may actually hear what you're saying better. If I'm not carrying any evidence to demonstrate what I'm trying to say it just becomes a jousting of "opinions". Your "opinion" has the same weight as their mainstream "opinion" that they fall back on by default. I see personal incredulity and consenus fallacies, and some kind of inner impulse to "regress to the mean" if that makes sense. There is some psychological stress on the other side, one because their beliefs are challenged by something that they have to process and rationalize and two because they'll have to admit that they're wrong. This is potentially caused by the explanatory power of a conspiracy which is much stronger than a random basic b***h CNN-level understanding of some event or trend.

          Are you referring to a telepathy, intuitive understanding, or seeking guidance from on High when engaging with people you're trying to assist? It may sound stupidbly obvious to say but higher consciousness is preferrable in all situations..

  29. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >being a psychological-model occultist, but using it for evil, is satanism!
    ok but why call it satanism?

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Because he's exposing the psychological profile of Satanists,

      https://i.imgur.com/YNVvxfE.jpeg

      I don't see what the issue is. See another source here, out of the three links I recommend the analysis first and foremost:

      Deathbed confessions of a Satanist:
      https://ia600704.us.archive.org/28/items/Satanism_201812/ConfessionsOfASatanist.pdf

      Full Audiobook:
      https://rumble.com/v2wg2b4-confessions-of-a-satanist-by-frater-616-deathbed-confession.html

      Analysis & Commentary:
      https://rokfin.com/post/54424/The-Coming-Satanic-Age-is-Here

  30. 1 month ago
    Anonymous
  31. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Satanists are just parasite infested gays that think they can use their homosexualry like child rape and sacrifice to get their ends, which is power to get more goon in their blackholes.
    They use a gaydemon as shield to feel important and untouchable.

  32. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Your OP image is a psyop.

    The Satanists genuinely worship moloch and Baal and demons,
    That's why they sacrifice family members and first born sons and transgender their children in disproportionate numbers,

    And the illusion of "athiests satanism" is a distraction, but also a method that they use to manipulate their lower rank human puppets, the ones they don't consider worth giving to a demon to possess or inhabit.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      OP here I agree with you, I have no issue with accepting that theistic Satanists exist who practice human sacrifice and so on. I posted this for instance which goes in depth into high level Luciferians and SRA. I can also add https://www.kla.tv/27300 as another testament, which I can't actually bring myself to finish, I haven't gone past the 20th minute. Here's more

      Separate but related

      What Mark Passio is doing is complicated. He's illustrating a broader problem, he's not being anti-Christian, or dismissive of SRA and Theistic Satanism in high places, but he's saying that these Satanists have psyopped the entire world and poisoned the consciousness of mankind, which is no small feat, into accepting slavery and being themselves evil and selfish. And he states that there is a reciprocal link between morality, understanding of natural law, harm, inherent rights, and freedom. How do you value the harm caused by the gigantic, astronomical theater of world (geo/)politics, poison in the food and water, ever increasing taxation and inflation; and on the other scale: human sacrifice? I'm not going to put a price on human suffering and compare each injustice and violation, but I'm going to say that they're all valid. I'd say one is the progenitor of the other, but unfortunately there is not enough criminal evidence on every single politician, CEO and media personality to make that your main case. Satanists want power, they want to be gods, and through psyopping mankind through a full-scale comprehensive mindwar they have achieved it. There is no contradiction or real conflict.

      Listen to the actual discussion between Mark and David, it's more complicated than these slides show, I'm just bumping, I don't think anyone ITT has actually listened to the discussion other than one anon.

      https://odysee.com/@woeih:e/Mark-Passio-X-Spaces-With-David-Icke-2024-04-05:c

      Just for you, this is the entire spaces audio from beginning to end https://files.catbox.moe/sm1seb.m4a

      The conversation starts with David at roughly 3minutes in, Mark comes in a bit after that.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >I posted this for instance which goes in depth into high level Luciferians and SRA.

        Because he's exposing the psychological profile of Satanists, [...] I don't see what the issue is. See another source here, out of the three links I recommend the analysis first and foremost:

        Deathbed confessions of a Satanist:
        https://ia600704.us.archive.org/28/items/Satanism_201812/ConfessionsOfASatanist.pdf

        Full Audiobook:
        https://rumble.com/v2wg2b4-confessions-of-a-satanist-by-frater-616-deathbed-confession.html

        Analysis & Commentary:
        https://rokfin.com/post/54424/The-Coming-Satanic-Age-is-Here

        forgot to link

  33. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Demons are real.

  34. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    bmp

  35. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    https://twitter.com/davidicke/status/1780599938956791811

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *