Dark Water of outerspace

Why are we still treating outer space as if it is a "vacuum"? On top of making no sense, something existing within a constant vacuum is in direct contradiction to the fact that the universe is (supposedly) expanding constantly.

It makes much more sense for outer space to be filled with a kind of "dark water" (dark here being used in the same manner that scientists use it, as something that cannot be directly "observed"); it's even got currents (gravitational waves), just like water.

Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14

Tip Your Landlord Shirt $21.68

Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14

  1. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    I recently had a dream about aether aka black matter the other day and made a shit post on it I wonder if you’re expanding on that shit post

    • 1 month ago
      Ariel

      I never saw that thread, anon. But perhaps in some way I am. ^_^

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Possible I’m not sure what new I could learn about aether but if you’re interested you should give this bud a watch

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      What’s that symbol called?

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Kerkhach it represents the 369 phi spiral vortex of reality as above so below

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          It’s crazy when you accidentally stumble upon some extremely sacred and hidden shit in the Armenian culture
          I wonder how many of them still understand the hidden meaning

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            This “simulation of self” is so fricking strange

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Is this singularity moron? I've been meaning to speak with you, I've progressed even further

            We're reaching an apex seemingly

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Yes it is I
            Frick yah anon glad to know I’m not just farting in the wind when I make amas and try to help others

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            No I enjoy your threads and would love to see more, it's always a nice use of the space here

            Keep it up!

  2. 1 month ago
    Ariel
  3. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    "Why are we still treating"

    is a better question.

    When we are not dogs but grown adult humans.

  4. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous
  5. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >It makes much more sense for outer space to be filled with a kind of "dark water" (dark here being used in the same manner that scientists use it, as something that cannot be directly "observed"); it's even got currents (gravitational waves), just like water.
    Water has mass. Fill the universe with that much mass and it'd not expanding.
    Unless be "cannot be directly observed" to include being massless. But if that is the case, how is it different from vacuum?

    • 4 weeks ago
      Ariel

      >Water has mass.
      water her too just like dark is being used more as a metaphor for another word. Water her would be more like a new state of matter that acts a lot like a fluid like water but with much more ephemeral characteristics.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Ariel

        >Water here, just like with the word dark, is being used as substitute for another word.*

        Fixed.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Fun fact all matter acts like a fluid some fluid is just infinitely slower and denser then aqua and some is infinitely faster and less dense

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          In other words, everything vibrates and the waves interacting with each other creates our reality.

  6. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >Why are we still treating outer space as if it is a "vacuum"?
    Because the ratio of matter to volume is so low as to be negligible.
    Because the gas pressure is not observable more than zero.
    >It makes much more sense for outer space to be filled with a kind of "dark water"
    Except every single attempt to observe - directly like regular or indirectly like we do with dark matter - has come up with nothing.
    The things that move through do not need a medium to explain their motion.
    And there has been no observation of a medium or of effects of a medium.

    The ONLY reason to say one is there is because it "feels right" to the people not actually doing the testing.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >And there has been no observation of a medium or of effects of a medium.
      Anon you mention dark matter but don’t seem to know what it is as it is the medium that forms galaxy’s dark energy lays outside of dark matter and is the medium in which dark matter forms

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Oh and aether dark energy is fractal in nature as it’s constantly expanding which makes it the strongest force of energy we know and is the key to zero point energy

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          ?si=0eT81iU7vAgncZ_r

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >it is the medium that forms galaxy’s dark energy
        Wrong.
        >dark matter is a hypothetical form of matter that appears not to interact with light or the electromagnetic field
        [Dark energy's] primary effect is to drive the accelerating expansion of the universe.
        The terms aren't known to be related other than the "dark" part, which just means we don't understand what we're observing.
        And NONE of it suggests or implies there is a propagating medium through space.
        Previous scientists thought the exact same way. It's why we even have the term luminiferous ether. But all the attempts to observe this medium turned up negative.
        The understanding then moved on and became more nuanced until we are at today's understanding that does not need some unknown medium to explain what we observe.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >Anon you mention dark matter but don’t seem to know what it is as it is the medium that forms galaxy’s
          What I said before you twisted it is not wrong as stars do not have the gradations pull to create galaxy’s this is where dark matter comes inline
          >And NONE of it suggests or implies there is a propagating medium through space
          Clearly you’ve done zero research on this
          > Previous scientists thought the exact same way. It's why we even have the term luminiferous ether
          They where correct to think in such a way
          > But all the attempts to observe this medium turned up negative.
          Explain the redshift then and how we know our universe is expanding

          Anon you come off as a glowBlack person by how you mix your stupidity with sound logic very sly and dishonorable

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >it is the medium that forms galaxy’s
            You mean matter? Yes. Matter forms galaxies, and a lot of it doesn't seem to interact with EM.
            >Clearly you’ve done zero research on this
            All research currently points to this being the best model.
            That is why the model is used.
            >Explain the redshift then and how we know our universe is expanding
            These things are easily found.

            [...]

            >instantly jumps to pathetic insults
            Post your nose, shill.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Did I say matter or did I say dark matter funny how this is the second time you’ve twisted me saying that the medium which forms galaxy’s is dark matter as the matter within galaxy’s does not have the gravitational pull to form galaxy’s and would otherwise disperse and spread out

            No all research does not point to your lack of research and how that’s valid and everything else is wrong because you say so

            Wow the measurable effect of dark energy that you just claimed isn’t real and can’t be because it can’t be measured is easily found

            I’m insulting you because you’re so moronic it glows in how you twist information
            God I hate glowBlack folk
            Go watch this video you dumbass may learn something if you are just a dumbass and not a disinfo agent

            https://youtu.be/Rh898Yr5YZ8?si=0eT81iU7vAgncZ_r

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >Did I say matter or did I say dark matter
            I said matter because because that is what you are talking about.
            Or should be, if you had intellect.
            You don't know what you are talking about.
            You have shown that with every post.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >You don't know what you are talking about.
            You have shown that with every post.

            Ironic lol you glow so hard your posts even contradict themself moron and because you’re being called out by some one who’s done there research you have no way of an intellectual rebuttal which is why you’ve been stumbling over yourself like a snake in heat

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >done their research
            >didnt even get the definition of dark matter correct
            >thinks dark matter isnt matter
            >immeditately started with pilpul the moment they were corrected

  7. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Ill take What is Spelljammer? for $600, Alex

  8. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Vacuum just means it is mostly devoid of particles, the fabric of spacetime still exists there, that is the "dark water" you are talking about, the medium through which forces (like gravity) propagate.

  9. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Buck Rogers was correct

  10. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    In the beginning there was nothing. And God moved over the the water of the heavens, and the Word was with God. (Codex translation)

    Bible wins again.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Science states that the initial propagation wave was akin to a sound wave because of the mode of transport and proximity of matter allowed the sound wave to propagate faster than light. This initial expansion created the emergence of all the electrostatic discharge filaments (condensation) we call stars.

  11. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    The earth is flat and stationary with a dome. There is likely above us and all around us, or some other type of primordial liquid.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *