Convenience me there is a connection between jesus and krishna

Convenience me there is a connection between jesus and krishna

It's All Fucked Shirt $22.14

Homeless People Are Sexy Shirt $21.68

It's All Fucked Shirt $22.14

  1. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    There’s no connection. Krishna was a troony extraterrestrial and Jesus was a Light being in human form.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      no that is wrong. krishna and jesus were both men. humans. lol

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      you paint krishna blue. but he wasnt blue. he was a man. now you think hes an alien because youbve never read or learned anythign laugable

  2. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Hinduism is garbage fanfiction based off of babylonian worship of the material world and concepts. Jesus is God. That's the difference

  3. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    they both let gore be - now fricking focus on today ...

  4. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    There is not. ISKON, a major Gaudiya Vaishnava Hindu organization and notable Hindu religion with any position on Jesus, sees Krishna as supreme person and God hold that Jesus as a pure devotee of Lord Krishna, but not as the Supreme God or source of all existence. They see him as a shaktyavesha-avatara, a type of being who has a mission on behalf of the supreme person in Vaishnavaite theology. Basically, to spread Vedic compliance and that Krishna is God. It is more of a way to co-opt some figures though. Usually, traditional shaktyavesha-avatara are doing things to defend the Vedas.

  5. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    뻥이야 ㅋㅋㅋ

  6. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    no

  7. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    "I and The Father are One" (John 10:30)
    "The Atman and Brahman are One"

    "I promises eternal life" (1 John 2:25)
    "I promises no re-birth" (Bhag. Gita)

    "Before Abraham was, I Am!" (John 8:58)
    "He who knows Me as beginningless/birthless...is free from all sins" (BG 10.3)

    "In Him we live and move and have our being" (Acts 17:28)
    "You are...the resting place of all beings" (Pic)

    God = Existence Itself

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      That the view that the Atman and Brahman Is one would be a feature of Advaita Vedanta, they would not hold that Krishna is the supreme God but hold that Shiva is the nirguna Brahman with beings like Shiva being kinda like masks of Shiva . The tradition that Krishna is God is a different tradition of Vedanta. Your quotes are just getting at the idea that each identifies God as some uncaused essence and source of all being.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        I meant Krishna being kinda like a mask of Shiva. It is because Advaita Vedanta is a Shaivist darshan.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          I meant that Advaita Vedanta as a Shavist Darshan hold that Krishna is like a mask of Shiva. Gaudiya Vaishnava, those who hold the Supreme Person would also reject the idea that you are the Brahman. They very very openly reject Advaita Vedanta but each other Vedantin tradition disagrees with the others anyhow. Instead of Advaita Vedanta they hold to Achintya Bheda Abheda Vedanta. In terms of quality, the soul (jiva) is described as being identical to God, but in terms of quantity it is different. Krishna has an infinite amount of quantity is different, hence why Krishna is supreme. They also hold that belief you are the Brahman will damn you.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        >The tradition that Krishna is God is a different tradition of Vedanta.

        and this particular tradition only came much later, in the gita krishna claims to be the self of the upanishads, which, if you remember IS brahman, so actually the advaitas are correct, and people like the iskcon are a cult based on a particular bhakti interpretation

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          Every tradition of Hinduism disagrees with each other. The earliest traditions not including Vedic Hinduism are classical Nyaya and Samkya followed by the Purva-Mimasa. All are the most dualistic traditions. I don't think Hinduism really thinks in terms of who came first anyway.

  8. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Both became avatars for the Christic energy (and anyone can become).

    Not to say that Jesus isn't "the Christ", as that is also the title of who's responsible for a planet, like a governor.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      He would not be the Christ in that context. Christ in Christianity is like a title, it refers to being the second person of the Trinity which is of the same essence of as the person's of the trinity but has all the attributes of God. It is also connected to claims in soteriology, the role of sanctification in total. For example, regardless of the model of atonement, like Christus Victor or substitutionary atonement, the idea is that the Christ or incarnation is the only one who can actually do it.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        Another way to think about it is that shaktyavesha-avatara is something that only a Vaishnava Hindu would have as well. The shaktyavesha-avatara makes sense when you think of the model of quantity and quality of the divine found in Vaishnava traditions in general and beliefs about the Vedas. Outside of that it does not make sense.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        Anon you're replying to here; while Christ would be an occupation, our Christ also happens to be the co-creator (alongside the Father) of our Universe; so for all our intents and purposes, he is Him, except individualized.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      How did Shiva bring Christ energy to earth if he is a being more inclined towards darkness? I understand about Jesus but...

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        I don't know much about Shiva but I do know that he works for the light, and that the "destruction" aspects attributed to him would be more properly described as "transformation" instead.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          Ok

  9. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    I have always wondered just how much hinduism and buddhism affected the development of christianity, considering that the indian philosophies were centuries ahead of the game

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Not much. The Apostle Thomas made it to India eventually but Christianity did not quite penetrate much. There is evidence that there Buddhists in Alexandria and some monastics were there. Further, the Island of Socotra in South Eastern Arabia was mainly various darshans of Hinduism and the Church of the East early in its history. However, there was little real contact between these religions. This is also because they had different philosophical views. The Buddhist religion is built from a view of reality as processes with no substances or essences. Hence, no need for a God to explain first causes. Hinduism and Christianity both do have a belief in substances, at least one atman but from there they developed differently.

  10. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Convenience you?

    what like give u a handjob as I explain?

  11. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >Convenience me
    Freudian slip?

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      I trusted google translate

  12. 2 months ago
    Inversion

    > Egypt (Moses bring the Torah / Old testament)
    Ra-Maat
    > Hindu
    7th aspect of Vishnu is Rama

    > Trinity : Son, Holy Ghost, Father
    Shiva / Vishnu / Brahma

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *